Rockinon Posted April 12, 2009 Author Posted April 12, 2009 No one? What if I were to tell you that it is unlikely anyone would take him in the 1st and possibly the second either. He is the #1 ranked OG in the draft...according to Scout.com.
rocwocka Posted April 12, 2009 Posted April 12, 2009 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-3qy7xxeVHA He looks good to me. I think he might be available in the 2nd when we pick. The question is, do we pick him over some like Alex Mack or Unger if all 3 are sitting there when we pick?
PromoTheRobot Posted April 12, 2009 Posted April 12, 2009 Jason Peters won't be playing here anymore so what's your point? PTR
Magox Posted April 12, 2009 Posted April 12, 2009 I was very much for drafting Duke Robinson in the second round, but recently I've changed my view. I've been reading from sources that refer to him as a player who doesn't give it his all during practices and lazy. I've also read that he is more of a mauler, and wouldn't fit too well in our zone blocking scheme, sort of like Dockery. I'm backing off Robinson and leaning more on Levitre for a thrid round selection.
Rockinon Posted April 12, 2009 Author Posted April 12, 2009 My guess is he may be there in the third. I'd like to see the DE Everette Brown in the first round. Maybe a good TE in the second....not sure who will be available in round 2. And Duke Robinson in the 3rd. Get Peters signed and suddenly this team is looking pretty strong on both sides of the ball.
The Dean Posted April 12, 2009 Posted April 12, 2009 My biggest concern about Duke, is almost everyone dubs him "lazy" at some point in the description.
Flbillsfan#1 Posted April 12, 2009 Posted April 12, 2009 No one? What if I were to tell you that it is unlikely anyone would take him in the 1st and possibly the second either. He is the #1 ranked OG in the draft...according to Scout.com. You are to LAZY to post the players name & I'm to lazy to click on the link.
Rockinon Posted April 12, 2009 Author Posted April 12, 2009 Jason Peters won't be playing here anymore so what's your point? PTR Put your money were your mouth is.
Magox Posted April 12, 2009 Posted April 12, 2009 You are to LAZY to post the players name & I'm to lazy to click on the link. but you're not too lazy to type 17 words?
The Dean Posted April 12, 2009 Posted April 12, 2009 You are to LAZY to post the players name & I'm to lazy to click on the link. Maybe you are both Duke Robinson.
Rockinon Posted April 12, 2009 Author Posted April 12, 2009 My biggest concern about Duke, is almost everyone dubs him "lazy" at some point in the description. I don't know. The guy rated #2 Herman Johnson is the one that looks lazy to me. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QTUhkbcxiHg
The Dean Posted April 12, 2009 Posted April 12, 2009 I don't know. The guy rated #2 Herman Johnson is the one that looks lazy to me.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QTUhkbcxiHg Using highlight reels to make judgments on players is a pretty flawed method. They only include the good stuff.
Rockinon Posted April 12, 2009 Author Posted April 12, 2009 Using highlight reels to make judgments on players is a pretty flawed method. They only include the good stuff. True. I am also using the top ratings...according to Scout.com. Not that that isn't a flawed method either. Hey, what else have I got to go on other than watching a few good college games.
ColdBlueNorth Posted April 12, 2009 Posted April 12, 2009 He looks good to me. I think he might be available in the 2nd when we pick. The question is, do we pick him over some like Alex Mack or Unger if all 3 are sitting there when we pick? I agree that he looks good, but if the Bills go offense and Mack is available we should grab him. We have not had a stud center since Hull left us and that kid is the definition of stud who plays with a nasty streak to the whistle. If we had Mack we could move Hangartner to guard where he has played before and where I think he is better suited with his size 6-5, 301. I was also watching the highlights of Urbik I thought he looked horrible, who would put a reel like that out? It was like watching a T-Rex on skates. Looked way too easy to shed those short stubby arms and he seemed to be off balance a lot. Michael Oher at LT though looks really good, if the Peters situation continues to degenerate, LT will become more of a need in this draft than Center where Hangartner can (hopefully) do no worse than Preston.
BillsFan Trapped in Pats Land Posted April 12, 2009 Posted April 12, 2009 Don't sleep on Antoine Caldwell.
DanInUticaTampa Posted April 12, 2009 Posted April 12, 2009 Using highlight reels to make judgments on players is a pretty flawed method. They only include the good stuff. uless it is bloopers
Lurker Posted April 12, 2009 Posted April 12, 2009 Hey, what else have I got to go on other than watching a few good college games. Game films two years from now...
Mark Vader Posted April 13, 2009 Posted April 13, 2009 If the Bills were to take an Offensive Guard, I'd rather they take Andy Levitre from Oregon State. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LBYwRvi4pZA
marauderswr80 Posted April 13, 2009 Posted April 13, 2009 id take just about any OL from Texas Tech they are flat out nasty
Recommended Posts