Ramius Posted April 9, 2009 Posted April 9, 2009 Gotta go michael johnson. We can do without a top flight TE, but we can't do without a pass rush. OL would not be wise either as they'd be strictly a backup behind PEters-Oher-Hangy-Butler-Walker
Joe Miner Posted April 9, 2009 Posted April 9, 2009 Loadholt Had they not picked up Oher in Rd 1, I would think he's a distinct possibility. I voted Mack. I think you can get just as good a value at TE later as you could with the ones already in the poll. I don't think any of the DE's left are a better value than Mack. Same with the LB's. I would be interested to see a Wood/Mack discussion though. I would have loved to address the front 7 on D at some point in the first two rounds, but you never know how the draft will shake out.
muddleman Posted April 9, 2009 Posted April 9, 2009 My guess would be Duke Robinson, our starting OG this year.
R. Rich Posted April 9, 2009 Author Posted April 9, 2009 I don't think any of the DE's left are a better value than Mack. Same with the LB's. Maybe so. Mack is a very highly rated OL, but then again, Johnson is fairly well thought of also. I would have loved to address the front 7 on D at some point in the first two rounds, but you never know how the draft will shake out. No biggie. Third downs will continue to be a load of fun. There's a good shot @ a trifecta (7-9 times 3).
R. Rich Posted April 9, 2009 Author Posted April 9, 2009 My guess would be Duke Robinson, our starting OG this year. Your guess was the 31st pick in this mock, by Arizona.
Joe Miner Posted April 9, 2009 Posted April 9, 2009 Maybe so. Mack is a very highly rated OL, but then again, Johnson is fairly well thought of also. I would have loved for one of the DL or LB's that were taken in this mock in the first to have slid to us in the second. That would have made this easy. No biggie. Third downs will continue to be a load of fun. There's a good shot @ a trifecta (7-9 times 3). Maybe with the new OL a 3rd round TE, and TO, our offense will never get off the field?
Ramius Posted April 9, 2009 Posted April 9, 2009 I would have loved for one of the DL or LB's that were taken in this mock in the first to have slid to us in the second. That would have made this easy. Maybe with the new OL a 3rd round TE, and TO, our offense will never get off the field? Good job on picking Mack. With Oher at guard, our 2nd round pick will look nice glued to the bench. But hey, who cares if we dont actually address team needs as long as we get what fans deem good "value." So now we've got mack and oher, and we can watch the defense ring up 20 sacks again on the season. Who cares about the pass rush? We've got FAT GUYS!
Recommended Posts