mousetrap08 Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 Peters was good, or better, in 2005, 2006 and 2007. What were you watching? I think it's more of what have you done lately to some fans.If you ask me I think the Bills should do what is with in reason to keep Peters.Daft picks don't always pan out and Peters have proved that he can play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dean Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 Wow. When is 11.5 sacks allowed considered better than two? That's how many Long allowed in his rookie season. Oh yes, I watched every game as Peters waved at rushers on their way to decapitate Edwards. If you think Peters has had 3 stellars years, then your standards are set really low. PTR Did I include 2008 in that list? Although I think the evaluation of a LT involves far more than sacks allowed, I didn't include last year, in my list...so where are you getting 11.5 sacks? You said Peters had ONE good year. I say he had THREE: 2005, 2006 and 2007. What problem did you have with his play in those years? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts