Estro Posted April 5, 2009 Posted April 5, 2009 Me too. If the two 2nd rders weren't enough then I wouldn't want Buffalo to pay much more. We have other important needs and our 1st rder at #11 is much too valuable to us and for him. If we made a trade with Peters and part of it was that we got a late 1st rder for him then that would be the most that I would like to see Buffalo part with for him. I'd even be excited if they got a D-lineman of his caliber with a late 1st and 3rd rounder (that would be as much as I would want to give up for him though). I mean the guy was a sure fire top 10 talent just 1 year ago. But you're right with all the holes the Bills have I wouldn't want to see them mortgage their future for a player who still has not established himself. Plus to be honest, I don't even know if Glenn Dorsey fits into our defensive scheme.
Tipster19 Posted April 5, 2009 Author Posted April 5, 2009 Plus to be honest, I don't even know if Glenn Dorsey fits into our defensive scheme. He does. He'd be great as a 4-3 DT.
freester Posted April 5, 2009 Posted April 5, 2009 He does. He'd be great as a 4-3 DT. maybe we should just trade Peters for Dorsey.
aristocrat Posted April 5, 2009 Posted April 5, 2009 maybe we should just trade Peters for Dorsey. that would be a great trade for us...if KC were able to work a deal out with peters before the trade then this could happen. i would love this deal.
Recommended Posts