Estro Posted April 5, 2009 Share Posted April 5, 2009 Me too. If the two 2nd rders weren't enough then I wouldn't want Buffalo to pay much more. We have other important needs and our 1st rder at #11 is much too valuable to us and for him. If we made a trade with Peters and part of it was that we got a late 1st rder for him then that would be the most that I would like to see Buffalo part with for him. I'd even be excited if they got a D-lineman of his caliber with a late 1st and 3rd rounder (that would be as much as I would want to give up for him though). I mean the guy was a sure fire top 10 talent just 1 year ago. But you're right with all the holes the Bills have I wouldn't want to see them mortgage their future for a player who still has not established himself. Plus to be honest, I don't even know if Glenn Dorsey fits into our defensive scheme. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tipster19 Posted April 5, 2009 Author Share Posted April 5, 2009 Plus to be honest, I don't even know if Glenn Dorsey fits into our defensive scheme. He does. He'd be great as a 4-3 DT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freester Posted April 5, 2009 Share Posted April 5, 2009 He does. He'd be great as a 4-3 DT. maybe we should just trade Peters for Dorsey. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aristocrat Posted April 5, 2009 Share Posted April 5, 2009 maybe we should just trade Peters for Dorsey. that would be a great trade for us...if KC were able to work a deal out with peters before the trade then this could happen. i would love this deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts