Guest dog14787 Posted April 5, 2009 Share Posted April 5, 2009 If the Bills draft Raji it will be: Lynch in trouble with the law about pot Last year's #2 allegedly tried to kill his father Now we draft a KNOWN pot head. Goodell will not be kind. He can say he is punishing LYnch, but it will punishment OF the Bills FOR Lyanch AND Raji. Naww, Goodelldorf, Raji Gaji, and the Lynchpin all three get together before the season starts to smoke em peace pipe. Meanwhile President Obammican is having another evening get together with all the Senators in the Whiter House and starts a discussion about the legalization of Pot and how it would help our country's failing economy. Obammican, being a smart fella and all realizes some of the Senators probably have never smoked a blunt before and in knowing this he sparks up a blunt the size of a football packed with the best Humboldt County skunk weed Jack Bower could find on such short notice and starts passing it around to all of the Senators asking them to yes, please inhale and then pretend they are under water and hold their breath as long as they can. As the Blunt makes its way around and has almost made its way back to him, he brings out the snack foods. Cakes, ice creams, donuts, cookies, Candy bars, you name it, Obammican has it, like I told you , he's a smart fella, that Obammican. So as you might guess, the Senators all start munching down like there's no tomorrow and their laughing and giggling a couple of the Senators are rolling on the ground and Obammican wonders if he went to far, but, nawww their probably just having a good time and can't stop laughing, he hopes so anyway. Just when the whole room was at a frenzied pitch and things couldn't get any better my alarm clock goes off, doggonit, just another doggie dream, now where did I put my weed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billsfreak Posted April 6, 2009 Share Posted April 6, 2009 I don't believe that Lynch's punishment will be based on who the Bills draft in any shape or form. So if they draft a player with good character, maybe he won't get suspended? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest dog14787 Posted April 6, 2009 Share Posted April 6, 2009 I don't believe that Lynch's punishment will be based on who the Bills draft in any shape or form. So if they draft a player with good character, maybe he won't get suspended? You can't beat posters like ieatcrayons ( Lori doesn't allow it) you can only join them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leonidas Posted April 6, 2009 Share Posted April 6, 2009 Irregardless of the suspension I think the biggest worry for Buffalo would be that neither Lynch or Raji would be allowed into Canada for the two games played there each year. Irregardless isn't a word. If the Bills draft Raji it will be: Lynch in trouble with the law about pot Last year's #2 allegedly tried to kill his father Now we draft a KNOWN pot head. Goodell will not be kind. He can say he is punishing LYnch, but it will punishment OF the Bills FOR Lyanch AND Raji. Yes, a guy who tested positive once for marijuana is a "pothead". Man, if you tested people you work with you'd be shocked at how many "potheads" you interact with on a daily basis. Get off your high horse, Mr. Moral. And Hardy didn't try to kill his father, he just had a gun on him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerball Posted April 6, 2009 Share Posted April 6, 2009 Irregardless isn't a word. Tell that to Miriam Webster cause she thinks it's a word. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leonidas Posted April 6, 2009 Share Posted April 6, 2009 Way to read. "Its reputation has not risen over the years, and it is still a long way from general acceptance. Use regardless instead." That's why it's listed at "nonstandard" - it has a negative prefix and suffix, and is just derived from constant erroneous combining of "irrespective" and "regardless." You just sound stupid using it. But don't let me stop you from your normal course of action... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerball Posted April 6, 2009 Share Posted April 6, 2009 Way to read. "Its reputation has not risen over the years, and it is still a long way from general acceptance. Use regardless instead." That's why it's listed at "nonstandard" - it has a negative prefix and suffix, and is just derived from constant erroneous combining of "irrespective" and "regardless." You just sound stupid using it. But don't let me stop you from your normal course of action... Irregardless of what you say, if it is good enough for Miriam it is more than good enough for me to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leonidas Posted April 6, 2009 Share Posted April 6, 2009 Irregardless of what you say, if it is good enough for Miriam it is more than good enough for me to. thanks for confirming you are a complete !@#$ing moron... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McD Posted April 6, 2009 Share Posted April 6, 2009 To the original post...."yawn". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerball Posted April 6, 2009 Share Posted April 6, 2009 thanks for confirming you are a complete !@#$ing moron... Wow hock, that's a rather harsh assessment don't you think? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bullpen Posted April 6, 2009 Share Posted April 6, 2009 Wow hock, that's a rather harsh assessment don't you think? Well.... ... you kinda are from time to time, irregardless of what leonidas says, most of us still like ya. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerball Posted April 6, 2009 Share Posted April 6, 2009 Well.... ... you kinda are from time to time, irregardless of what leonidas says, most of us still like ya. kinda is not a word Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ieatcrayonz Posted April 6, 2009 Author Share Posted April 6, 2009 I don't believe that Lynch's punishment will be based on who the Bills draft in any shape or form. So if they draft a player with good character, maybe he won't get suspended? I think that if the Bills draft a high character guy, it will not help them nor will it hurt them from Goodell's point of view. If they draft Raji, who is a now a known pot head, along with Lynch who is a known pot head, Goodell will see this as a sign from the Bills that they don't care what he thinks. It doesn't have as much to do with Raji as it does with the Bills relationship with the NFL. At some point Goodell will feel he has to stand up for himself. Hardy allegedly trying to kill his father does not help either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bullpen Posted April 6, 2009 Share Posted April 6, 2009 kinda is not a word Well if you're going to cite Maryanne Webster, then I can throw your home-girl Sarah Palin out there as proof that Kinda IS a word! So THERE, Beeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeerbaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaawwwwwwwwwl. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts