BillsGuyInMalta Posted April 3, 2009 Posted April 3, 2009 and from the man himself: http://tightend.blogspot.com/2009/04/24-hr...d-counting.html The guy is more of a blocking TE though, cant really provide too much receiving threat.
ans4e64 Posted April 3, 2009 Posted April 3, 2009 and from the man himself: http://tightend.blogspot.com/2009/04/24-hr...d-counting.html The guy is more of a blocking TE though, cant really provide too much receiving threat. Then he should be perfect for the Bills
LynchMob23 Posted April 3, 2009 Posted April 3, 2009 They said they wanted to go into camp with 4 - so if they drafted a pure receiver at TE and picked him up as a FA, they make sure they have the versatility to go 2 TE without sacrificing blocking or receiving!
Canadian,eh! Posted April 3, 2009 Posted April 3, 2009 Wrightster is underrated. He showed a real knack for the 1st down marker a couple years ago. He's had some injury issues, but really the terrible Jax passing game ahs held him back a lot. He's not the stretch the field TE we are hoping for, but he's a very good all-round TE that can get open underneath and keep the chains moving.
atlbillsfan1975 Posted April 3, 2009 Posted April 3, 2009 Wrightster is underrated. He showed a real knack for the 1st down marker a couple years ago. He's had some injury issues, but really the terrible Jax passing game ahs held him back a lot. He's not the stretch the field TE we are hoping for, but he's a very good all-round TE that can get open underneath and keep the chains moving. Isnt that a TE the Bills already have in Fine? The Bills shouldn't have two guys like that on the roster.
Canadian,eh! Posted April 3, 2009 Posted April 3, 2009 Isnt that a TE the Bills already have in Fine? The Bills shouldn't have two guys like that on the roster. Derek Fine has not proven to be anything as of yet. I'm not saying Wrighster would be an upgrade for sure, but he may be. either way neither of them are game breakers that solve the TE spot for us.
Recommended Posts