Wacka Posted March 30, 2009 Posted March 30, 2009 You libs made no mention of Chelsea Clinton, also underage at the time, who got totally sh*tfaced every weekend at the DKE parties at Stanford.
Kelly the Dog Posted March 30, 2009 Posted March 30, 2009 Since when does doing one line make anyone anywhere a "coke whore"?
Gene Frenkle Posted March 30, 2009 Posted March 30, 2009 Since when does doing one line make anyone anywhere a "coke whore"? Since she's the daughter of a Democrat.
Chump Change Posted March 31, 2009 Author Posted March 31, 2009 Hey, nice work! You've made it to the second page! Just 28 or so more to go to match to outrage over a teen getting pregnant and deciding to have the baby and whose mother was against abortion. Terrible! And I don't know if she's a whore, but she sure is hot! I know it'll take awhile for you apologists to get it in gear.
ExiledInIllinois Posted March 31, 2009 Posted March 31, 2009 Hey, nice work! You've made it to the second page! Just 28 or so more to go to match to outrage over a teen getting pregnant and deciding to have the baby and whose mother was against abortion. Terrible! And I don't know if she's a whore, but she sure is hot! I know it'll take awhile for you apologists to get it in gear. It has always been tit-for-tat, the problem know is that the game has been going on so long nobody knows who started it. Such is life.
YellowLinesandArmadillos Posted March 31, 2009 Posted March 31, 2009 It has always been tit-for-tat, the problem know is that the game has been going on so long nobody knows who started it. Such is life. The real deal is nobody can bring themselves to quit and why unilaterally disarm anyway. The real problem is too many people take the tit-for-tat seriously, like it really means something? Such is Life.
swede316 Posted April 2, 2009 Posted April 2, 2009 The real deal is nobody can bring themselves to quit and why unilaterally disarm anyway. The real problem is too many people take the tit-for-tat seriously, like it really means something? I agree...I think we are headed for a sh-- storm. There is some real animosity building.
Wacka Posted April 2, 2009 Posted April 2, 2009 The problem is that when the Republicans are in control, bi-partisanship really means bi-partisanship. When the dems are in control it is my way or the highway, BOHICA.
bills_fan Posted April 2, 2009 Posted April 2, 2009 I think she's hot and would love to party with her.
blzrul Posted April 2, 2009 Posted April 2, 2009 The problem is that when the Republicans are in control, bi-partisanship really means bi-partisanship.When the dems are in control it is my way or the highway, BOHICA. TALK ABOUT COKE WHORES, YOU MUST BE HIGH ON SOMETHING or else seriously delusional .... seriously.
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted April 2, 2009 Posted April 2, 2009 TALK ABOUT COKE WHORES, YOU MUST BE HIGH ON SOMETHING or else seriously delusional .... seriously. NCLB is a perfect example of what he's talking about. The Republicans (and this is the reason I don't vote for them) tend to act like Domocrats when they attain control. That is to say, they spend money that isn't theirs with absolute indiscretion.
swede316 Posted April 3, 2009 Posted April 3, 2009 NCLB is a perfect example of what he's talking about. The Republicans (and this is the reason I don't vote for them) tend to act like Domocrats when they attain control. That is to say, they spend money that isn't theirs with absolute indiscretion.So you vote for Democrats because Republicans act like Democrats so you won't vote for Republicans??
Recommended Posts