Fingon Posted March 19, 2009 Posted March 19, 2009 per Pat Kirwin We basically have enough money to sign our rookies.
Erik Posted March 19, 2009 Posted March 19, 2009 per Pat Kirwin We basically have enough money to sign our rookies. Who cares about cap room? How much cash to cap do they have left?
Kelly the Dog Posted March 19, 2009 Posted March 19, 2009 per Pat Kirwin We basically have enough money to sign our rookies. I don't see how that is true. We're not even close to the real cap. And we havent put out a lot of cash.
Fingon Posted March 19, 2009 Author Posted March 19, 2009 I don't see how that is true. We're not even close to the real cap. And we havent put out a lot of cash. We were $23 million under before FA, then we gave T.O. $6.5 mill, signed Hangartner, got hit with a cap penalty for cutting Dockery, and got Pat Thomas. and we signed Fitzpatrick
Erik Posted March 19, 2009 Posted March 19, 2009 We were $23 million under before FA, then we gave T.O. $6.5 mill, signed Hangartner, got hit with a cap penalty for cutting Dockery, and got Pat Thomas. and we signed Fitzpatrick IIRC even factoring in the hit for Dockery, we still saved about 500k on the cap. Or it might have been a 500k penalty. Either way it doesn't explain where the 7 mil. of cap room that went to Hangartner, Fitzpatrick, Florence and Thomas.
Fingon Posted March 19, 2009 Author Posted March 19, 2009 T.O. = $6.5 mill Hangartner= probably in the 2-3ish range Florence= $3.3 That leaves us with around $10 million cap room (not counting Fitzpatrick and Thomas)
Fingon Posted March 19, 2009 Author Posted March 19, 2009 Peters could put us VERY close to the cap. (if he gets a new deal)
billsfreak Posted March 19, 2009 Posted March 19, 2009 If what you are sayng is correct, what a big disappointment this Bills are again. They signed all unknowns, mostly career backups and one malcontent aging star, who has as much of a chance of ripping the team apart as he does helping it. I hope it isn't true, but if it is, it only furthers the fact that we are the laughing stock of the NFL.
seq004 Posted March 19, 2009 Posted March 19, 2009 T.O. = $6.5 millHangartner= probably in the 2-3ish range Florence= $3.3 That leaves us with around $10 million cap room (not counting Fitzpatrick and Thomas) They will release another player before camp. They have the dollars for another free agent. We have to many holes going into the draft.
VABills Posted March 19, 2009 Posted March 19, 2009 T.O. = $6.5 millHangartner= probably in the 2-3ish range Florence= $3.3 That leaves us with around $10 million cap room (not counting Fitzpatrick and Thomas) 25 million after dock was cut. http://www.billszone.com/mtlog/archives/20...ry_cap_page.php
VABills Posted March 19, 2009 Posted March 19, 2009 Oh and if they are truthful in being cash to cap, they have 39 million to spend to get there. That will be bonus money to spend and current year salaries. Finally I don't think rookie money will be 10 million. I would guess closer to 6.
Erik Posted March 19, 2009 Posted March 19, 2009 T.O. = $6.5 millHangartner= probably in the 2-3ish range Florence= $3.3 That leaves us with around $10 million cap room (not counting Fitzpatrick and Thomas) Hantgartner was a multi year deal so his cap number isn't necessarily his avg. annual.
BillsGuyInMalta Posted March 19, 2009 Posted March 19, 2009 Clumpy, can you help us out on this one? I seriously hope the Bills fill their OLB or TE hole before entering the draft,
BillsBum11 Posted March 20, 2009 Posted March 20, 2009 yeah were probably done, rookies are visiting now, not free agents
oak tree 12 Posted March 20, 2009 Posted March 20, 2009 IIRC even factoring in the hit for Dockery, we still saved about 500k on the cap. Or it might have been a 500k penalty. Either way it doesn't explain where the 7 mil. of cap room that went to Hangartner, Fitzpatrick, Florence and Thomas. the poster is incorrect on what kirwin said he said we are 10 million under the cap and i said thats barely enough to sign peters and our rookies. when we started free agency we were 27 million under the cap TO=6.8 hangartner =3.3 fitz=3.3 florance = 2.5 thomas=? then we signed our restricted free agents do the math kirwin is right on the money.
LynchMob23 Posted March 20, 2009 Posted March 20, 2009 It probably is 10 million in cap dollars and around 24 in cash-to-cap dollars, which means almost all of that C2C money is going to Peters...
VABills Posted March 20, 2009 Posted March 20, 2009 One more thing, I believe only so many salaries count against the cap, top 41 maybe at this time. It allows for expanded rosters. So the cap number is a little skewed. Clumpy surely would clear it up.
thewildrabbit Posted March 20, 2009 Posted March 20, 2009 the poster is incorrect on what kirwin said he said we are 10 million under the cap and i said thats barely enough to sign peters and our rookies. when we started free agency we were 27 million under the cap TO=6.8 hangartner =3.3 fitz=3.3 florance = 2.5 thomas=? then we signed our restricted free agents do the math kirwin is right on the money. Why on earth did they pay him that much,someone enlighten me pls
seq004 Posted March 20, 2009 Posted March 20, 2009 the poster is incorrect on what kirwin said he said we are 10 million under the cap and i said thats barely enough to sign peters and our rookies. when we started free agency we were 27 million under the cap TO=6.8 hangartner =3.3 fitz=3.3 florance = 2.5 thomas=? then we signed our restricted free agents do the math kirwin is right on the money. I really not trying to be difficult but does it take 10 million to cover rookies this year? That seems a bit high.
Erik Posted March 20, 2009 Posted March 20, 2009 I really not trying to be difficult but does it take 10 million to cover rookies this year? That seems a bit high. Also the numbers for all FA's besides Owens are very inflated...I think I read Hantgartner and Fitz are both under 2 million cap hit this season.
Recommended Posts