SDS Posted November 3, 2004 Posted November 3, 2004 Banning gay marriage. Good sign for Bush. 97788[/snapback] screw the people of Ohio - it only matters what the judges in MA declare is right and just for America.
erynthered Posted November 3, 2004 Posted November 3, 2004 Banning gay marriage. Good sign for Bush. 97788[/snapback] Plus Civil unions too, I believe.
Thailog80 Posted November 3, 2004 Posted November 3, 2004 Banning gay marriage. Good sign for Bush. 97788[/snapback] That should be a bumper sticker.........
Alaska Darin Posted November 3, 2004 Posted November 3, 2004 In related news, the price of petroleum based product "Vaseline" has skyrocketed to a new record high in Ohio. Developing...
erynthered Posted November 3, 2004 Posted November 3, 2004 That should be a bumper sticker......... 97794[/snapback] Nice post your Honor!
KD in CA Posted November 3, 2004 Author Posted November 3, 2004 That should be a bumper sticker......... 97794[/snapback] BAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! p.s. yes, civil unions too. Looks like P&G will be able to save a bundle by not paying health insurance for 'domestic partners'.
jester43 Posted November 3, 2004 Posted November 3, 2004 hmmm...i guess this would be a good place to ask: why are people so determined to discriminate against gay people?
KD in CA Posted November 3, 2004 Author Posted November 3, 2004 hmmm...i guess this would be a good place to ask: why are people so determined to discriminate against gay people? 97816[/snapback] I dunno. Maybe it has something to do with people being upset at attempts being made to teach their children about "gay lifestyle" in public schools or being forced to include a "gay themed" float in their local St. Patrick's Day parade.
_BiB_ Posted November 3, 2004 Posted November 3, 2004 hmmm...i guess this would be a good place to ask: why are people so determined to discriminate against gay people? 97816[/snapback] Because marriage is the union for life of a man and a woman. Next question? And that's not "homophobic" either, UCONN (pre-emptive). Just because I don't agree with something doesn't mean I'm afraid of it. Phobic means fear, but you know that. That is more of a liberal tendency. I fear very, very, very little.
jester43 Posted November 3, 2004 Posted November 3, 2004 Because marriage is the union for life of a man and a woman. Next question? And that's not "homophobic" either, UCONN (pre-emptive). Just because I don't agree with something doesn't mean I'm afraid of it. Phobic means fear, but you know that. That is more of a liberal tendency. I fear very, very, very little. 97829[/snapback] you mean "for life" for 48% of them, right? sounds like they have some business telling gay people about marriage. anyway, my next question: says who?
_BiB_ Posted November 3, 2004 Posted November 3, 2004 you mean "for life" for 48% of them, right? sounds like they have some business telling gay people about marriage. anyway, my next question: says who? 97841[/snapback] Says me. This is an opinion board, there is no requirement for me to post a link. That's the way I see it, that's the way I view it, and that's, for me, the way it is. I don't care where people put their dicks. I really don't. I also understand what a slippery slope is. Unless you are sexually oriented gender association challenged, why do you have a dog in the fight, anyway?
jester43 Posted November 3, 2004 Posted November 3, 2004 i don't know...my cousin's gay...but he's not really trying to get married,so it's nothing personal from my perspective. i guess i'm just the live-and-let-live type. i think it's really !@#$ed up when straight people pass laws that tell gay people how to live their lives. life liberty and the pursuit of happiness, you know? if it's not hurting anyone, and i believe it is not, i don't know why we should legislate against it.
Alaska Darin Posted November 3, 2004 Posted November 3, 2004 i don't know...my cousin's gay...but he's not really trying to get married,so it's nothing personal from my perspective. i guess i'm just the live-and-let-live type. i think it's really !@#$ed up when straight people pass laws that tell gay people how to live their lives. life liberty and the pursuit of happiness, you know? if it's not hurting anyone, and i believe it is not, i don't know why we should legislate against it. 97871[/snapback] I agree. However, I don't think gays should be allowed to adopt. That's about the only line I draw. I understand the slippery slope argument as well.
erynthered Posted November 3, 2004 Posted November 3, 2004 I dunno. Maybe it has something to do with people being upset at attempts being made to teach their children about "gay lifestyle" in public schools or being forced to include a "gay themed" float in their local St. Patrick's Day parade. 97827[/snapback] Stop that Kev, yoou should know better than to post facts.
jester43 Posted November 3, 2004 Posted November 3, 2004 really? i didn't think there was much of a correlation between sexual preference and one's ability to care for and love children. i think it has more to do with emotional maturity than one's sex life. and what is this slippery slope? i know this might give rise to some good jokes, but seriously, what horrible thing is going to happen in our culture if some gay peoiple get married.
Alaska Darin Posted November 3, 2004 Posted November 3, 2004 I dunno. Maybe it has something to do with people being upset at attempts being made to teach their children about "gay lifestyle" in public schools. 97827[/snapback] Just another reason to get government out of the education business.
justnzane Posted November 3, 2004 Posted November 3, 2004 I agree. However, I don't think gays should be allowed to adopt. That's about the only line I draw. I understand the slippery slope argument as well. 97881[/snapback] i was raised by a bisexual man and he did a better job raising me than my straight mother and her abusive boyfriends did. BTW I am straight, so don't start that crap about gay men spreading their sexuality to their kids. Also, I see no harm done with two men or two women getting married. What is wrong with a couple regardless of sexuality vowing to love each other?
Tux of Borg Posted November 3, 2004 Posted November 3, 2004 I don't know about you but I wouldn't want to take homosexual ed in highschool. What 3% of the population does behind closed doors is their own business. No need to expose it to the rest of us. As for a parade... they are tax payers and should be entitled to a float. As for marriage... I consider that a religious issue to be decided by the church. I personally don't believe in civil unions but don't think its the place of the federal government to step in and say its wrong. Civil unions don't pose a threat or danger to society as I see it.
Recommended Posts