iinii Posted March 19, 2009 Share Posted March 19, 2009 nonsense! the bills have no leverage and no choice in the matter - they are backed against the wall and, furthermore, are obligated to give peters anything he demands. haven't you been reading this board? (apparently, according to some, mr. 'i-scored-six-on-the wonderlic' is also quite brilliant ) the Bills should hold the line with Peters, he is under contract and it is high time he learned a lesson. He could be making some substantial money but chooses to try to leverage what? He needs to show up and play ball. Every year that slides by costs him at least three million and in life you don't get those back. In football it becomes even more precious, time that is. i had said previously that the Bills should give Ralph's money away and sign him but now, whatever. just like last year he will come in for his check, be prepared to sit him and let him know that this is a team game and you don't need a pro bowl tackle to get a ring. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lets_go_bills Posted March 20, 2009 Share Posted March 20, 2009 So you're saying that the Buffalo News reports of the Peters' camps initial number of $11.5 per season is erroneous? If you have better information document it please. Neither Peters nor his agent have said anything publicly. Jake Long's deal put him at $11.5M per and Peters' camp said he wanted to be the highest paid LT in the league. That means he wants more than the $11.5M Long makes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VOR Posted March 20, 2009 Share Posted March 20, 2009 Shoulda given him a new contract prior to the draft last year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts