mrags Posted March 19, 2009 Posted March 19, 2009 Ok, as of 3-5-09 Roy Williams is a FA. Can anyone tell me why we are not entertaining this idea? Take a look at the arguements for Williams before you rip my throat out. 5× Pro Bowl selection (2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007) "As a rookie in 2002, he was moved to free safety in order to play alongside strong safety Darren Woodson. Although it should be noted that the Cowboys defensive scheme that year allowed both players to interchange positions as to allow confusion for the opposing offenses. Williams was also runner-up for Defensive Rookie of the Year" A 5 time Pro Bowler seems like a good leader that this defense might need. Someone that plays hard, and hits hard. He could play either FS, or SS and switch back and forth with Whitner similar to how they used him in Dallas when he played with Woodson. You could argue that the only reason why he didnt make the Pro Bowl last year is because he injured himself during the 2nd game of the season with a broken arm. He came back 4 weeks later and refractured the same arm. Your thoughts?
OklahomaBill Posted March 19, 2009 Posted March 19, 2009 Have you watched him play lately? He is a safety who cannot cover anyone.
PromoTheRobot Posted March 19, 2009 Posted March 19, 2009 Have you watched him play lately? He is a safety who cannot cover anyone. Yes, but we heard of him. That alone makes him better than anyone on the Bills currently. Don't you know anything? PTR
Mr. WEO Posted March 19, 2009 Posted March 19, 2009 One year contract. It's all gonna happen in 2009, men.
thebug Posted March 19, 2009 Posted March 19, 2009 Makes a big hit every now and then, but is lost in coverage. I would rather another team in the division pick him up.
stuckincincy Posted March 19, 2009 Posted March 19, 2009 (edited) Your thoughts? ..."According to the Dallas Morning News, former Cowboys safety Roy Williams will visit the Bengals today. Williams appeared in four Pro Bowls while Bengals defensive coordinator Mike Zimmer was in Dallas.". http://news.cincinnati.com/article/2009031.../903190374/1066 Near-classic CIN owner/president/GM Mike Brown action. Brown would be interested in Beelzebub himself, if he was a vet, and he sniffed a bargain...might work out somewhere, but the jury is certainly out on Williams...spot-duty LB? Edited March 19, 2009 by stuckincincy
ricojes Posted March 19, 2009 Posted March 19, 2009 Am I the only one wondering why were not entertaining this idea? Most likely...
StupidNation Posted March 19, 2009 Posted March 19, 2009 Have you watched him play lately? He is a safety who cannot cover anyone. He already have one of those in Whitner. We don't need 2 safeties who cannot cover the ball. Williams, to his defense, can at least play in the box like a LB.
Leonidas Posted March 19, 2009 Posted March 19, 2009 Pro Bowl's are more or less irrelevant. Roy Williams is terrible. He should put on ten lbs. and pull a 'Coy Wire' and move to WLB.
GOBILLS78 Posted March 19, 2009 Posted March 19, 2009 A shell of his former self. A liability in coverage.
atlbillsfan1975 Posted March 19, 2009 Posted March 19, 2009 One of the reason his play diminished was because Dallas switched its scheme. He had his probowl years in a 4-3 cover two style D. Which the Bills play now. Not saying he is a great cover safety by any means. But a few guys have stated he could be had relatively cheap comming off two injured arms last year. And yes he could play linebacker. He is a tough hitter, and i bet he could cover just as good as any linebacker the Bills currently have under contract. He was/has been mentioned to make the move to LB. I would not be surprised which ever team signs him will try to move him to a linebacker.
MattyT Posted March 19, 2009 Posted March 19, 2009 Your most compelling argument is that he's a frequent Pro Bowler. Pretty thin.
mrags Posted March 19, 2009 Author Posted March 19, 2009 My biggest arguement is WHO ELSE DO WE HAVE AT SAFETY?!? Do we really think that Corto, Simpson, Scott, Wendling are the answers? Williams may not be the best safety, he might not even be the best out out there right now, but its just a thought.
atlbillsfan1975 Posted March 19, 2009 Posted March 19, 2009 Oh yeah and he is 6'0 225. I think that is about the same size as Ellison. And if you are gonna tell me Ellison is as big a hitter or has the same skills as Williams then you aren't watching the same thing i am. And given the fact he likes to play inside the box and help with run support while he was at safety, then its not that big of a change for him. Especially if he is already familiar with the scheme. And his coverage skills at linebacker/ who he would be responsible for covering are a lot different then at safety.
Leonidas Posted March 19, 2009 Posted March 19, 2009 One of the reason his play diminished was because Dallas switched its scheme. He had his probowl years in a 4-3 cover two style D. Which the Bills play now. Not saying he is a great cover safety by any means. But a few guys have stated he could be had relatively cheap comming off two injured arms last year. And yes he could play linebacker. He is a tough hitter, and i bet he could cover just as good as any linebacker the Bills currently have under contract. He was/has been mentioned to make the move to LB. I would not be surprised which ever team signs him will try to move him to a linebacker. Dude...Roy Williams is not a cover 2 safety. Cover 2 means the safeties get deep, that is the *worst* position to put him in. Even the LB's in a cover 2 have to get to their zones and be quick in coverage - he's more of a run stopping SS than anything. A real 'tweener. I guess he's good in certain situations but I doubt he'd want to a) come to Buffalo to b) get 10-15 plays/game. My biggest arguement is WHO ELSE DO WE HAVE AT SAFETY?!? Do we really think that Corto, Simpson, Scott, Wendling are the answers? Williams may not be the best safety, he might not even be the best out out there right now, but its just a thought. I'll take Ko Simpson and Whitner over Roy Williams. Byron Scott is a good situational SS too. I wouldn't mind exploring S in the draft though. Oh yeah and he is 6'0 225. I think that is about the same size as Ellison. And if you are gonna tell me Ellison is as big a hitter or has the same skills as Williams then you aren't watching the same thing i am. And given the fact he likes to play inside the box and help with run support while he was at safety, then its not that big of a change for him. Especially if he is already familiar with the scheme. And his coverage skills at linebacker/ who he would be responsible for covering are a lot different then at safety. That's more of a negative on Ellison than it is a positive on RW. I don't disagree with you totally, I just don't know that he can get off the blocks like a LB and actually tackle. Sure he can hit people, but can he wrap up? It's totally different playing LB than SS.
MattyT Posted March 19, 2009 Posted March 19, 2009 My biggest arguement is WHO ELSE DO WE HAVE AT SAFETY?!? Do we really think that Corto, Simpson, Scott, Wendling are the answers? Williams may not be the best safety, he might not even be the best out out there right now, but its just a thought. The problems are 1) adding "Horse Collar Roy" is also not the answer and 2) his Pro Bowls and the precedent set by his previous contract will make it expensive to obtain his mediocre services. Seriously, the fact that nobody wanted him badly enough to trade for him... it's taken him two weeks to find an interested party ...and that the interested party is Cincy's terrible defense should be good indicators of his true value.
lets_go_bills Posted March 19, 2009 Posted March 19, 2009 He's making his first visit today. To Cincy! lol. But he had his best years under Cincy's current DC, Mike Zimmer, so it makes sense.
Recommended Posts