UBinVA Posted March 18, 2009 Posted March 18, 2009 Is this the future of our capitalists system? These elite scum bags must be called out and exposed. When people are proud to show off Che Guevara and not true leaders of freedom and liberty; we as a people are screwed. Our schools need to teach our children the truth about people like Guevara. People in Obama camp also wear this crap and it makes me sick. http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/03/aig...he_guevara.html http://www.wikio.com/news/Gerry+Pasciucco CHE SHOW ONLY GLORIFIES PORTRAIT OF A RUTHLESS KILLER http://www.today.ucla.edu/portal/ut/971010CheShow.aspx
drnykterstein Posted March 18, 2009 Posted March 18, 2009 Lol, I have no idea why you are trying to use this AIG thing to smear Obama but I find it both comical and desperate on your part. Eric Cantor and John Boehner caused this AIG thing. They had the chance to pass legislation to block this and they took out the wording that democrats put in to block this. And now that it's all out in the open they are coming out publicly against AIG, after the fact.
UBinVA Posted March 18, 2009 Author Posted March 18, 2009 Lol, I have no idea why you are trying to use this AIG thing to smear Obama but I find it both comical and desperate on your part. Eric Cantor and John Boehner caused this AIG thing. They had the chance to pass legislation to block this and they took out the wording that democrats put in to block this. And now that it's all out in the open they are coming out publicly against AIG, after the fact. You're an idiot. This post was about elitist and socialists that are now running this country and industry. The AIG executive wearing a Che shirt shows how far reaching the socialists have infiltrated this country and how popular these iconic views are without proper perspective. As far as your second rant, what the hell are you talking about? All I know is that Chris Dodd said he didn't put that amendment in the bill but was later modified in committee. Well, who runs and controls the committee? The dems I think. Of course, it is worth mentioning that Dodd is also the largest recipient of AIG political contributions, with more than $100,000 in the 2008 cycle.
drnykterstein Posted March 18, 2009 Posted March 18, 2009 1. Having elite people run a country is a good thing 2. Obama is not a socialists. He doesn't claim to be. Socialists do not embrace him, his policies are not socialist. 3. I pulled that second part out of my ass, the same place you are pulling this Obama/socialist crap.
slothrop Posted March 18, 2009 Posted March 18, 2009 By the way, Che HATED socialism He saw it as capitalist corruption of the ideals of communism. Just sayin'. Also, like about 50% of college students, I am willing to bet that the dude with the Che T-shirt has NO IDEA who Che really was and what he stood for - kind of like you.
IDBillzFan Posted March 18, 2009 Posted March 18, 2009 As far as your second rant, what the hell are you talking about? All I know is that Chris Dodd said he didn't put that amendment in the bill but was later modified in committee. Well, who runs and controls the committee? The dems I think. Of course, it is worth mentioning that Dodd is also the largest recipient of AIG political contributions, with more than $100,000 in the 2008 cycle. It's all okay now. Geithner says AIG will return the $165M back to the treasury. Actually, AIG isn't returning anything. Geithner is just going to hold back $165M of the $30 billion for their next bailout installment. And there's nothing about AIG taking the bonuses back from the people who received them. So apparently the bonuses will stay, and they'll still be covered by taxpayers, but it will LOOK like it was fixed. You typically can NOT get this kind of fun for free, even on the Comedy Channel, so I look forward to Liddy's testimony today.
erynthered Posted March 18, 2009 Posted March 18, 2009 It's all okay now. Geithner says AIG will return the $165M back to the treasury. Actually, AIG isn't returning anything. Geithner is just going to hold back $165M of the $30 billion for their next bailout installment. And there's nothing about AIG taking the bonuses back from the people who received them. So apparently the bonuses will stay, and they'll still be covered by taxpayers, but it will LOOK like it was fixed. You typically can NOT get this kind of fun for free, even on the Comedy Channel, so I look forward to Liddy's testimony today. I didnt know "Change" could be so sad and damn funny at the same time. http://www.nypost.com/seven/03182009/news/...ites_160098.htm
Chef Jim Posted March 18, 2009 Posted March 18, 2009 It's all okay now. Geithner says AIG will return the $165M back to the treasury. Actually, AIG isn't returning anything. Geithner is just going to hold back $165M of the $30 billion for their next bailout installment. And there's nothing about AIG taking the bonuses back from the people who received them. So apparently the bonuses will stay, and they'll still be covered by taxpayers, but it will LOOK like it was fixed. You typically can NOT get this kind of fun for free, even on the Comedy Channel, so I look forward to Liddy's testimony today. I'm just going to keep posting this.
Adam Posted March 18, 2009 Posted March 18, 2009 Socialism evil......oh, wait- its people who are evil. Socialism is just a thing.
/dev/null Posted March 18, 2009 Posted March 18, 2009 1. Having elite people run a country is a good thing I take it you're not a fan of that whole "government of the people, by the people, and for the people" thing?
SageAgainstTheMachine Posted March 18, 2009 Posted March 18, 2009 I take it you're not a fan of that whole "government of the people, by the people, and for the people" thing? you can't trust people
drnykterstein Posted March 18, 2009 Posted March 18, 2009 I take it you're not a fan of that whole "government of the people, by the people, and for the people" thing? Is that concept in opposition or conflict with having the smartest people people in the government offices? (and are you really trying to argue that having elite people in office is bad? wtf?)
Chef Jim Posted March 18, 2009 Posted March 18, 2009 I take it you're not a fan of that whole "government of the people, by the people, and for the people" thing? Being the elitist bastard that I am it works for me.
Chef Jim Posted March 18, 2009 Posted March 18, 2009 Is that concept in opposition or conflict with having the smartest people people in the government offices? (and are you really trying to argue that having elite people in office is bad? wtf?) It depends on what your definition of elite is.
Joe Miner Posted March 18, 2009 Posted March 18, 2009 It depends on what your definition of elite is. And your definition of smart
Chef Jim Posted March 18, 2009 Posted March 18, 2009 And your definition of smart I'm not looking for smart, elite, rich, etc. I'm looking for honest, logical, subservient people who know who they work for and hired them. Is that asking too much?
Joe Miner Posted March 18, 2009 Posted March 18, 2009 I'm not looking for smart, elite, rich, etc. I'm looking for honest, logical, subservient people who know who they work for and hired them. Is that asking too much? Yeah, those kind of people don't want to work with the selfish crooks and liars that are currently in the gov't.
DC Tom Posted March 18, 2009 Posted March 18, 2009 (and are you really trying to argue that having elite people in office is bad? wtf?) Yeah, democracy works so much better with a !@#$ing ruling class.
UBinVA Posted March 18, 2009 Author Posted March 18, 2009 By the way, Che HATED socialism He saw it as capitalist corruption of the ideals of communism. Just sayin'. Also, like about 50% of college students, I am willing to bet that the dude with the Che T-shirt has NO IDEA who Che really was and what he stood for - kind of like you. Che Guevara was revolutionary Marxist, a communist and a murderer. You can't get to communism without first being a socialist state. So this dude, a former vice chairman of Morgan Stanley and the head of AIG's financial products division didn't know about Che when he was going to this small Cuban themed party held in London? So I guess AIG was run by a bunch of idiots. And those Che wearing college students haven't been brainwashed by their professors that Che was a good revolutionary for the common people or do they just buy a this shirt to look cool?
Recommended Posts