billsfan_34 Posted March 14, 2009 Posted March 14, 2009 I sure would love to see this guy fall to us. He is truly a game changer in the trenches. Him and Stroud next to eachother would be a force to reckon with and we would all see better play from the LB's and DB's. I really dont see him lasting past the first 5 picks though. What is everyones thoughts? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9UQ2YGE9SLM
Fingon Posted March 14, 2009 Posted March 14, 2009 seems a bit overweight to me. He would need to slim down a bit to play in our scheme.
billsfan_34 Posted March 14, 2009 Author Posted March 14, 2009 seems a bit overweight to me. He would need to slim down a bit to play in our scheme. Ok so let me ask you this. Has "our scheme" been succesful? Stroud is a large guy too. And McCargo was a smaller DT and didnt fit "our scheme". Everyone is so hung up on scheme. A football player is a football player and this guy is really good. The Tampa 2/Cover 2 is a D where every piece of the puzzle has to be perfect and Honestly most offenses have figured it out IMO. I do appreciate your input though.
Buffaloed in Pa Posted March 14, 2009 Posted March 14, 2009 The human pear with man boobs, Just say no to Wimpy
billsfan_34 Posted March 14, 2009 Author Posted March 14, 2009 The human pear with man boobs, Just say no to Wimpy News flash...75 percent of the d linemen have weight issues.
DrDawkinstein Posted March 14, 2009 Posted March 14, 2009 sam adams, pat williams and ted washington were bikini models...
Fingon Posted March 14, 2009 Posted March 14, 2009 Ok so let me ask you this. Has "our scheme" been succesful? Stroud is a large guy too. And McCargo was a smaller DT and didnt fit "our scheme". Everyone is so hung up on scheme. A football player is a football player and this guy is really good. The Tampa 2/Cover 2 is a D where every piece of the puzzle has to be perfect and Honestly most offenses have figured it out IMO. I do appreciate your input though. Stroud is 6-6 310... he's not huge. McCargo didn't fit our scheme because he couldn't get consistent penetration. Raji can get penetration, but to do it in the NFL he will need to drop 10-20 pounds. and yes our scheme was been successful. We were in the top half of the league last year in defense... add a DE and we are top 10.
ax4782 Posted March 14, 2009 Posted March 14, 2009 If Buffalo drafted Raji at #11 (which will never happen, but just for sh-ts and giggles we'll assume), they could draft Ayers or Michael Johnson in the second and grab either a TE or a C/G in the third, which would pretty much take care of our most pressing holes on the team, allowing us our later choices to add some depth where it's needed most, the OL and at DL and LB. Never going to happen, but it's fun to speculate.
Magox Posted March 14, 2009 Posted March 14, 2009 Raji would be my #1 choice. He is being projected to go somewhere between 10-12. I wouldn't be surprised if he doesn't make it past 6
Buffaloed in Pa Posted March 14, 2009 Posted March 14, 2009 News flash...75 percent of the d linemen have weight issues. Yeah but there is shizt jiggeling and flopping everywhere when he runs. A little soft for me.
SABURZFAN Posted March 14, 2009 Posted March 14, 2009 if the Bengals don't get him, the Packers will. no shot that he falls to Buffalo unless they trade up.
billsfan_34 Posted March 14, 2009 Author Posted March 14, 2009 Stroud is 6-6 310... he's not huge. McCargo didn't fit our scheme because he couldn't get consistent penetration. Raji can get penetration, but to do it in the NFL he will need to drop 10-20 pounds. and yes our scheme was been successful. We were in the top half of the league last year in defense... add a DE and we are top 10. What was our rank I dont remember....15 I think. Thats not playoff caliber. I dont know about you but I sum up sucess when a D can get you into the playoffs. We havent done that in 3 years under fewell and some how he gets a pass.
billsfan_34 Posted March 14, 2009 Author Posted March 14, 2009 If Buffalo drafted Raji at #11 (which will never happen, but just for sh-ts and giggles we'll assume), they could draft Ayers or Michael Johnson in the second and grab either a TE or a C/G in the third, which would pretty much take care of our most pressing holes on the team, allowing us our later choices to add some depth where it's needed most, the OL and at DL and LB. Never going to happen, but it's fun to speculate. Good logic there.
Captain Caveman Posted March 14, 2009 Posted March 14, 2009 I love the penetration this guy gets, but did anyone else notice how may tackles he missed? Which means he would fit in perfectly in Buffalo. Classic Bills Tackling.
billsfan_34 Posted March 14, 2009 Author Posted March 14, 2009 Yeah but there is shizt jiggeling and flopping everywhere when he runs. A little soft for me. Remember Sam Adams rumbling around? It was funny watching him but hey, he made plays and thats really all that matters.
billsfan_34 Posted March 14, 2009 Author Posted March 14, 2009 I love the penetration this guy gets, but did anyone else notice how may tackles he missed? Which means he would fit in perfectly in Buffalo. Classic Bills Tackling. Lots of DT's will miss a tackle here and there. There body just isnt as agile as a LB or DE. His job is to clog running lanes, Push the pocket in, be disruptive and at times just contain. This guy can do all those things which will end up in turnovers for us.
Fingon Posted March 14, 2009 Posted March 14, 2009 What was our rank I dont remember....15 I think. Thats not playoff caliber. I dont know about you but I sum up sucess when a D can get you into the playoffs. We havent done that in 3 years under fewell and some how he gets a pass. We would have been in the playoffs if our offense wasn't so pitiful. We will have a top 10 defense if we can get a pass rusher.
Buffaloed in Pa Posted March 14, 2009 Posted March 14, 2009 Remember Sam Adams rumbling around? It was funny watching him but hey, he made plays and thats really all that matters. Sam was a tank not a pear.
Fingon Posted March 14, 2009 Posted March 14, 2009 Not saying i wouldn't take him, but i think he would better serve us at 315 rather than 330+.
billsfan_34 Posted March 14, 2009 Author Posted March 14, 2009 We would have been in the playoffs if our offense wasn't so pitiful. We will have a top 10 defense if we can get a pass rusher. Sure our offense was awful too I cant argue there. But our D was equally as bad and we need more than just a pash rusher though. Our LB corps is weak.
Recommended Posts