richNjoisy Posted March 9, 2009 Share Posted March 9, 2009 http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/09/sports/f...ml?ref=football As I have felt basically from the start - a one year deal is perfect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DazedandConfused Posted March 9, 2009 Share Posted March 9, 2009 This article should be saved as a reply to anyone who wants to argue flat out that the Bills should not have signed TO. It is important not because it makes the claim that the TO signing guarantees success for the Bills, but that it is a signing with huge upside for the team that takes the risk and the downsides are managed as well as they can be managed by the one year contract. Overall, it simply is funny as from the Bills fan perspective one can judge our situation as the worst it could be in the world as we have not even made the playoffs this millenium, but this takes a Jets fans perspective that the Bills record of making 4 SBs in the last 20 years simply does not compare to the futility of the Jets not making an SB in over 40 years. Both are true, it is the perspective as to whether you judge a glass as being 3/4 empty or 1/4 full that makes the difference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KOKBILLS Posted March 9, 2009 Share Posted March 9, 2009 http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/09/sports/f...ml?ref=football As I have felt basically from the start - a one year deal is perfect. Tought to argue with the Bills decision after reading that!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts