seq004 Posted March 8, 2009 Posted March 8, 2009 I know NE has the better proven QB but it should at least make things exciting when these two rivals match up. I think Welker is more of a possesion reciever but I think TO and Evans will light it up as long as Edwards doesn't slump again.
silvermike Posted March 8, 2009 Posted March 8, 2009 So, Owens/Evans. Welker/Moss. Versus. Ginn/Camarillo and Cotchery/Stuckey.
murra Posted March 8, 2009 Posted March 8, 2009 I know NE has the better proven QB but it should at least make things exciting when these two rivals match up. I think Welker is more of a possesion reciever but I think TO and Evans will light it up as long as Edwards doesn't slump again. Slump? When was the non-slump? Light it up? I'm trying to be really optimistic about all this...but stop pretending that Edwards has the ability to toss the ball for 300 yrds in a game.
SWVABillsFan Posted March 8, 2009 Posted March 8, 2009 TO brings another great viable weapon to this offense, as well a superb work ethic. Things are only going to open up. When we start hitting the short stuff and defenses suck up Trent can throw a ball 30-40 yards down the field to an open Owens or Evans, so back off i-d-10t's. I can hear the crowd new everytime Owens scores: OOOOOOOOOO-WWWWWWWW-EEEEEEEE-NNNNNNNNNN-SSSSSSSS followed by the shout song.
12Kachy Posted March 8, 2009 Posted March 8, 2009 Moss and Welker will not compare to Owens, Evans, and Parrish/Reed/Hardy. Come on. We still have a 6'4 Receiver in Hardy. You spread the offense out will Hardy and Owens on the outside, Evans and Parrish/Reed on the inside, some poor 3rd/4th down CB/LB is getting burned. Also, Owens will have an impact on the younger guys (Hardy). A veteran receiver teaching the younger guys.
murra Posted March 8, 2009 Posted March 8, 2009 We still have a 6'4 Receiver in Hardy. You spread the offense out will Hardy and Owens on the outside. 6'4? Man...this guy has been shrinking since we drafted him. I thought he was 6'8, mini-camp he was 6'7, by the time he caught a ball he was 6'6... now he's 6'4?
Spiderweb Posted March 8, 2009 Posted March 8, 2009 6'4? Man...this guy has been shrinking since we drafted him. I thought he was 6'8, mini-camp he was 6'7, by the time he caught a ball he was 6'6... now he's 6'4? Well, depending where one searches, I came up with a range of 6'5" to 6'7" just moments a ago.... At 6'4", he sure does seem to be shrinking....
Tsaikotic Posted March 8, 2009 Posted March 8, 2009 its not the wr's vs wr's Im interested in.. I want to know wich teams in our division have a secondary that can stand up to T.O / Evans / Reed and hopefully a good TE from the draft
seq004 Posted March 8, 2009 Author Posted March 8, 2009 Slump? When was the non-slump? Light it up? I'm trying to be really optimistic about all this...but stop pretending that Edwards has the ability to toss the ball for 300 yrds in a game. Umm Trent's numbers were pretty good the first half of the year, stop making it like he's not capable of throwing the ball downfield.
Recommended Posts