Chuckknox Posted March 5, 2009 Posted March 5, 2009 TO vs. Moss - 2 times a year !! Just think of the ticket sales and TV coverage. A marketing man's dream.
Lofton80 Posted March 5, 2009 Posted March 5, 2009 Imagine Beast Mode and TO putting on a show. We haven't had a lot of hotdogging since Bruce and Biscuit left town. I bet Brandon is thinking about it.
H2o Posted March 5, 2009 Posted March 5, 2009 Get your popcorn ready and cut on the XBox 360 because that's the only way it's gonna happen.
mead107 Posted March 5, 2009 Posted March 5, 2009 TO vs. Moss - 2 times a year !! Just think of the ticket sales and TV coverage. A marketing man's dream. NO tto TO .
The Dean Posted March 6, 2009 Posted March 6, 2009 Play-in and play-out, TO is a better receiver than Moss. TO is tall. He plays hard on every down. He blocks downfield. He makes great catches, in clutch situations. In short, he is a complete WR. Downside? He drops a lot of passes. Moss is tall. Makes great catches and doesn't drop many passes. Downside? Doesn't block or play hard if he isn't the primary receiver (ie takes MANY plays off). Both are idiots and potential problems in the locker room.
dave mcbride Posted March 6, 2009 Posted March 6, 2009 Play-in and play-out, TO is a better receiver than Moss. TO is tall. He plays hard on every down. He blocks downfield. He makes great catches, in clutch situations. In short, he is a complete WR. Downside? He drops a lot of passes. Moss is tall. Makes great catches and doesn't drop many passes. Downside? Doesn't block or play hard if he isn't the primary receiver (ie takes MANY plays off). Both are idiots and potential problems in the locker room. Neither are idiots, I think. Moss strikes me as pretty intelligent, actually, although he has had attitude problems in the past. For the Pats, he's been sensational -- no quit, as far as I can see. He's also had a couple of seasons over the course of his career that are better than any Owens has had, and TO's had some good ones. Owens is clever, but he's malignant. The reason he has the impact he does is because he attracts followers. He incites and emotionally feeds off his ability to be divisive.
ColdBlueNorth Posted March 6, 2009 Posted March 6, 2009 TO vs. Moss - 2 times a year !! Just think of the ticket sales and TV coverage. A marketing man's dream. No contest Moss. Hands-down Moss is the better receiver - better hands, deceptive speed, and can outjump just about any corner. Moss can take over even when double-covered. I have never seen a receiver pluck the ball out of the air like he does with one freak'n hand since they outlawed "stick'em" in the NFL. He is a very unique talent, and can make any QB that can heave the ball near him look like an All-Pro.
billsfreak Posted March 6, 2009 Posted March 6, 2009 Moss, it isn't even close. T.O. puts up good numbers, but he also drops more balls than any other receiver in the league too.
The Dean Posted March 6, 2009 Posted March 6, 2009 Neither are idiots, I think. Moss strikes me as pretty intelligent, actually, although he has had attitude problems in the past. For the Pats, he's been sensational -- no quit, as far as I can see. He's also had a couple of seasons over the course of his career that are better than any Owens has had, and TO's had some good ones. Owens is clever, but he's malignant. The reason he has the impact he does is because he attracts followers. He incites and emotionally feeds off his ability to be divisive. Perhaps we have a different definition of "idiot". Guys with this much talent, who get shuffled from team-to-team have issues...label those issues what you will. If you think Moss has had no quit with the Pats*, you weren't paying attention last year. He consistently dogged it, until it became clear that Cassel didn't suck, and the team had a chance to make the playoffs. Ni ether of these guys are the ultimate team player. At least Owens puts it all out on the field. Moss certainly does not.
PromoTheRobot Posted March 6, 2009 Posted March 6, 2009 That depends on whether T.O or Moss are getting the ball that play and actually give a crap. PTR
The Dean Posted March 6, 2009 Posted March 6, 2009 That depends on whether T.O or Moss are getting the ball that play and actually give a crap. PTR See, IMO, both will complain and be problematic, if they aren't getting the ball. The difference between the two, IMO, is Owens will still play hard.
dubj04 Posted March 6, 2009 Posted March 6, 2009 Moss, because even if he takes a play off the defense still has to account for him. If he keeps staying out of trouble at some point you have to separate him from T O type behavior.
The Dean Posted March 6, 2009 Posted March 6, 2009 Moss, because even if he takes a play off the defense still has to account for him. If he keeps staying out of trouble at some point you have to separate him from T O type behavior. TO never gets in trouble. He's just a jerk.
BuffaloBill Posted March 6, 2009 Posted March 6, 2009 TO vs. Moss - 2 times a year !! Just think of the ticket sales and TV coverage. A marketing man's dream. Dude look at what is being said about TO out of Dallas. Lost spped and cancer in the locker room. No Thanks.
Recommended Posts