WVUFootball29 Posted March 5, 2009 Posted March 5, 2009 Virgil1528 said: but did we even try? Who's to say we didn't?
Virgil Posted March 5, 2009 Posted March 5, 2009 WVUFootball29 said: Who's to say we didn't? dunno. i'm honestly asking
WVUFootball29 Posted March 5, 2009 Posted March 5, 2009 Virgil1528 said: dunno. i'm honestly asking If we didn't get him in for a visit, I'm sure at least a phone call was made
VOR Posted March 5, 2009 Posted March 5, 2009 Virgil1528 said: but did we even try? I heard that the Bills contacted him, but he told them to pound sand.
DDD Posted March 5, 2009 Posted March 5, 2009 SageAgainstTheMachine said: We didn't overpay Hangartner he's getting 2.5 million a year, right? And could have had a 6 time pro-bowler for 3 million year in Birk to fill a huge void on offense. Brilliant work bills front office. What a complete bunch of inept assclowns.
VOR Posted March 5, 2009 Posted March 5, 2009 Do people actually read what's being written in the posts in this thread? Birk had NO INTEREST in coming to the Bills. Therefore they could NEVER have signed him.
Flbillsfan#1 Posted March 5, 2009 Posted March 5, 2009 VOR said: Do people actually read what's being written in the posts in this thread? Birk had NO INTEREST in coming to the Bills. Therefore they could NEVER have signed him. It was reported Birk did not want Trent touching his a$$.
Recommended Posts