The Dean Posted March 8, 2009 Posted March 8, 2009 I didn't mean that it makes no sense from a football standpoint. I meant it makes no sense in that the scenario doesn't compute. The Bills simply haven't operated this way. Ahh...gottcha. Well, due to both the Bills' and TO's desperation, this year, the start aligned. Yes, this is really out of character for Ralph.
Lori Posted March 8, 2009 Author Posted March 8, 2009 For an expanded version of Tim's thoughts on T.O., you might try clicking here: Bills shake up their offense with Terrell Owens. And here: T.O. gives Bills desperately needed target And my question: whether this deal ends up being a stroke of genius or a train wreck, your job just got a little more fun today, didn't it?
Virgil Posted March 8, 2009 Posted March 8, 2009 Tim, I have two questions, if that's allowed . 1) What do you think the Bills interest is in Pettigrew. From what I hear, the guy has no speed and is more of a blocking TE. He also appears to have a bit of a personality issue. Isn't this the opposite of what we need, hence the release of Robert Royal? 2) There is a lot of Taboo about trading first round picks. But, with the lack of talent in this years draft, would it not make sense to look at a trade for Owen Daniels who would bring much more value than any guy at number 11?
TimGraham Posted March 8, 2009 Posted March 8, 2009 For an expanded version of Tim's thoughts on T.O., you might try clicking here: Bills shake up their offense with Terrell Owens. And my question: whether this deal ends up being a stroke of genius or a train wreck, your job just got a little more fun today, didn't it? I won't miss Joey Porter as much now that I'll have T.O. in my new back yard.
Lori Posted March 8, 2009 Author Posted March 8, 2009 Sure beats the standard Jauron press conference ...
millbank Posted March 8, 2009 Posted March 8, 2009 Eventful night to say the least and the wall still stands no server crash.... Did the Bills just sign a no. two receiver or a number one? or do they now have a number one and one A. Evans has been the man, will this push him to be a better player?
TimGraham Posted March 8, 2009 Posted March 8, 2009 Eventful night to say the least and the wall still stands no server crash.... Did the Bills just sign a no. two receiver or a number one? or do they now have a number one and one A. Evans has been the man, will this push him to be a better player? I don't think either can be labeled No. 1 or No. 2. The critical question is whether T.O. will care about a designation, but I don't think he will as long as the ball comes his way.
millbank Posted March 8, 2009 Posted March 8, 2009 Whatever can be said one thing is certain that this signing put the buzz into a rather stagnant team situation. Thank you kindly for your comment Tim... I don't think either can be labeled No. 1 or No. 2. The critical question is whether T.O. will care about a designation, but I don't think he will as long as the ball comes his way.
TimGraham Posted March 8, 2009 Posted March 8, 2009 Tim, I have two questions, if that's allowed . 1) What do you think the Bills interest is in Pettigrew. From what I hear, the guy has no speed and is more of a blocking TE. He also appears to have a bit of a personality issue. Isn't this the opposite of what we need, hence the release of Robert Royal? 2) There is a lot of Taboo about trading first round picks. But, with the lack of talent in this years draft, would it not make sense to look at a trade for Owen Daniels who would bring much more value than any guy at number 11? 1) Pettigrew is the most complete tight end in the draft. He's a great blocker, but he can catch, too. You're right, though, in that he's not all that fast. 2) The Bills would have to give up a first and a third to sign Daniels, who is a restricted free agent and has been given the maximum tender. But I agree with the gist of what you're getting at.
Lori Posted March 8, 2009 Author Posted March 8, 2009 I don't think either can be labeled No. 1 or No. 2. The critical question is whether T.O. will care about a designation, but I don't think he will as long as the ball comes his way. What happens if it doesn't? Wait, I think we already know that answer. So now, we need a line good enough to let TE work downfield. A starting LG would help that. Any word yet on Kendall Simmons -- or anyone else, for that matter?
The Dean Posted March 8, 2009 Posted March 8, 2009 What happens if it doesn't? Wait, I think we already know that answer. So now, we need a line good enough to let TE work downfield. A starting LG would help that. Any word yet on Kendall Simmons -- or anyone else, for that matter? So would a starting LT. What's the status with the Peters talks?
BillsVet Posted March 8, 2009 Posted March 8, 2009 Tim, I've heard in separate articles that Dick Jauron either did or didn't have much say in the decision to sign. What do you know about his role in all of this. In all honestly, I can't see DJ wanting TO, despite this being a make or break season for the HC. I've said it before, if DJ doesn't like this move then I love it.
The Dean Posted March 8, 2009 Posted March 8, 2009 Tim, I've heard in separate articles that Dick Jauron either did or didn't have much say in the decision to sign. What do you know about his role in all of this. In all honestly, I can't see DJ wanting TO, despite this being a make or break season for the HC. I've said it before, if DJ doesn't like this move then I love it. DJ spoke with TO, this afternoon before the deal was done, from what I have read. TO said he like what he heard, from DJ. I can't imagine DJ being such a willing participant to something that had to be done "against his wishes" or over his head. My guess is, even if it wasn't DJ's idea, or first choice, he signed on before the deal was done.
TimGraham Posted March 8, 2009 Posted March 8, 2009 DJ spoke with TO, this afternoon before the deal was done, from what I have read. TO said he like what he heard, from DJ. I can't imagine DJ being such a willing participant to something that had to be done "against his wishes" or over his head. My guess is, even if it wasn't DJ's idea, or first choice, he signed on before the deal was done. What he said.
The Dean Posted March 8, 2009 Posted March 8, 2009 What he said. http://www.buffalobills.com/media-lounge/v...0d-3db55fb25d62
GG Posted March 8, 2009 Posted March 8, 2009 If you want details on the dialogue before each pick, I'm sorry. I don't have that kind of inside-the-war room information. Dick Jauron signs off on every move, and everybody answers to Ralph. But based on what I've been told it's a consensus. Modrak pitches the guys he wants. Guy pitches the guys he wants. Jauron approves or disapproves. Overdorf decides who they can pay. Beyond that, I can't help you. Thanks for confirming my hunch. Anything exciting happen in AFC East over the weekend?
TimGraham Posted March 8, 2009 Posted March 8, 2009 Nice work on the Radio Tim. Thanks, wonderbread. I'm never sure where that can be heard.
haus Posted March 8, 2009 Posted March 8, 2009 I don't think they've consciously thrown in the towel, but they sure seem like an organization that has run out of ideas. When that happens, new blood is needed in the front office. They have declined to bring in new blood. Hey Tim, thanks for answering. I guess I spoke to soon and your right they did not throw the towel in. Woderfull signing in my opinion and wow shocking to say the least. Maybe that saved the Front office, atleast for this year, haha very happy here , Thanks again.
BillsNYC Posted March 8, 2009 Posted March 8, 2009 Tim - With TO in the AFC East, and ESPN's and the sports nuts "obsession" with him, your standing within the network just skyrocketed. Something tells me the National Sports World will get to know Tim Graham much better. Congrats!
Recommended Posts