BeastMode54 Posted March 1, 2009 Posted March 1, 2009 If we are able to add a Pro Bowl OG and have upgraded at Center, along with getting a backup QB, I'll feel much better about our offseason. If can add a WR or OLB as well, I actually will have changed my mind about the FO this off-season
Huuuge Bills Posted March 1, 2009 Posted March 1, 2009 Come on Buffalo!! Make this happen! Anyone know what's his contract looking like? Â Looks pretty good. I would gladly pay him 3.6 for this year.
BillsGuyInMalta Posted March 1, 2009 Posted March 1, 2009 They claim that it'll take a deal "similiar to Stroud's" last year. Â If a 3rd and 5th is what it takes, send em' away tonight and get him in here tomorrow
Kelly the Dog Posted March 1, 2009 Posted March 1, 2009 Come on Buffalo!! Make this happen! Anyone know what's his contract looking like? Cheap by today's standards. He would cost about 10.5 million for three years (3.6 this year, 2.9 next, and 3.9 in 2011). Unless there was an extra bonus in there not listed. But this is usually pretty accurate info. Â http://www.rotoworld.com/content/playerpag...NFL&id=1371
Fingon Posted March 1, 2009 Posted March 1, 2009 Having lost a 2nd rounder for Cassel, i think KC might be willing to trade him. However, we would need to give him a new deal. Â Â All in all, i could see this happening since he is so discontent in KC
Kelly the Dog Posted March 1, 2009 Posted March 1, 2009 Pat Moran? We'll see. Lately he's been fairly decent. Before he was often way off in his info.
Tipster19 Posted March 1, 2009 Posted March 1, 2009 If Waters is that good of a player why would Pioli trade him and trade him to us of all teams? I don't think that we should do anything with the Chiefs, I'm still miserable about Bledsoe. Â On a side note. Waters is upset because Pioli wouldn't meet with him on a one-to-one meeeting. DT Shaun Rogers in Cleveland is complaining about the same thing with Mangini. What, is this a Patriot thing?
Magox Posted March 1, 2009 Posted March 1, 2009 http://buf.scout.com/2/843380.html  In the article, it says that we would most likely have to sign him to a new deal. So it would cost most likely pretty big bucks.
thebug Posted March 1, 2009 Posted March 1, 2009 Looks pretty good. I would gladly pay him 3.6 for this year. Â Â He wants a new contract....so I don't think we would be so lucky.
Fingon Posted March 1, 2009 Posted March 1, 2009 Water & Simmonds would complete the OL! Hell yeah.  LT- Peters LG- Waters C- Hangartner RG- Simmons (Butler for depth?) RT- Walker   Very intriguing
Tcali Posted March 1, 2009 Posted March 1, 2009 Waters is a short, thickly-built nine-year veteran who has good natural strength and above-average athleticism. He has been one of the most consistent players on the Chiefs' offensive line over the past six seasons. He is a good combination of power and athletic ability. He has good initial quickness to engage defenders and gain leverage. He can get on the edge when pulling and is effective to searchlight defenders on the second level. He is a good knee-bender who works with good balance and short-area agility. He has good hand use and initial pop to jolt his opponent. He is an instinctive player who reacts well to stunts and twists and is rarely out of position. Waters works with a good natural power base and works his feet well to finish blocks. nice
BeastMode54 Posted March 1, 2009 Posted March 1, 2009 http://buf.scout.com/2/843380.html In the article, it says that we would most likely have to sign him to a new deal. So it would cost most likely pretty big bucks.  We just cleared a lot of salary. GET ER DONE!
Magox Posted March 1, 2009 Posted March 1, 2009 Hell yeah. LT- Peters LG- Waters C- Hangartner RG- Simmons (Butler for depth?) RT- Walker   Very intriguing If we get waters, I think Simmons is then out of the question. Butler showed promise last year, plus we are paying him millions, I don't think we would invest so much in Hangartner, simmons, Peters, Walker, Butler and then a very expensive contract in Waters.
extrahammer Posted March 1, 2009 Posted March 1, 2009 The 2 guys I wish they would show some interest is Mike Goff from San Diego and Mark Tauscher from Green Bay.  Mike Goff - While the Chargers would probably prefer to keep Goff, the franchise has been effective in drafting and developing linemen and might look for Goff’s replacement at a better price. Goff has been a leader who simply goes about his business and players like running back Ladainian Tomlinson have benefited from his level of play. Goff has played for a quality line for some time and he’s a big part of the equation when it comes to success.  Mark Tauscher - Tauscher is a seventh round pick that became a success story. In his first season in the NFL, he was forced into a starting role because of an injury to another player. Tauscher isn’t an elite player, but he is solid in his role as a starter and hadn’t missed a game since 2002 until this season. Tauscher could be at the top of many team’s lists because he could come cheaper than some of the other free agent lineman, but could be nearly or equally effective.
CardinalScott Posted March 1, 2009 Posted March 1, 2009 I would do it now, he's a good player and a great team leader
ans4e64 Posted March 1, 2009 Posted March 1, 2009 If it takes a 2nd, or maybe even a 3rd round pick, along with a new contract, I'd rather pass on Waters and sign someone in free agency that is good and avoid losing the high picks.
Recommended Posts