LabattBlue Posted February 27, 2009 Posted February 27, 2009 pBills said: I do not understand the hype over Coles. Reed Hardy Johnson Jenkins Parrish Now do you understand?
pBills Posted February 27, 2009 Posted February 27, 2009 I am not about to bash Josh. After all his third down receptions carried that offense most of the year. Definitely need a good #2, not feeling the idea of spending lots of money on Coles. And dear god. I know who we currently have on the offense, I just don't like the idea of Coles.
MartyBall4Buffalo Posted February 27, 2009 Posted February 27, 2009 pBills said: I do not understand the hype over Coles. 24- The Number of tds coles has had since returning to the jets in 05 33- The number of tds Evans/Reed/Parrish combined have had since 2005 Not to mention that he's a massive upgrade over Josh Reed as a #2 receiver.
Astrobot Posted February 27, 2009 Posted February 27, 2009 I disagree. Hardy will start on IR, so it'd be Evans-Coles-Reed-Johnson-Parrish-Jenkins (or a draft pick in the same round as Johnson--Quan Cosby?) until Hardy returns.
extrahammer Posted February 27, 2009 Posted February 27, 2009 I believe he ran a 4.3 in the 40 during the combine when he was drafted.
RayFinkle Posted February 27, 2009 Posted February 27, 2009 LabattBlue said: ReedHardy Johnson Jenkins Parrish Now do you understand?
beastly23 Posted February 27, 2009 Posted February 27, 2009 the hype? of course the hype. coles is a better known name in this league than Lee Evans. Not saying hes better but one things for sure....hes better than hardy for next year. he can become a threat in any offense esp. in buffalo. coles has a proven record. its up to edwards for our offense to succeed.
pBills Posted February 27, 2009 Posted February 27, 2009 Sieve said: 24- The Number of tds coles has had since returning to the jets in 05 33- The number of tds Evans/Reed/Parrish combined have had since 2005 Not to mention that he's a massive upgrade over Josh Reed as a #2 receiver. Again, not saying that I like the choice. I'd rather see them go after: T.J. Houshmandzadeh - Spend some money for ONCE or save a little bit of money and go after Washington or Henderson and help out the OL line with a possible big signing.
pBills Posted February 27, 2009 Posted February 27, 2009 MrJasper said: I believe he ran a 4.3 in the 40 during the combine when he was drafted. Well that's relevant now.
San Jose Bills Fan Posted February 27, 2009 Posted February 27, 2009 MrJasper said: I believe he ran a 4.3 in the 40 during the combine when he was drafted. Yes but going into his tenth season, he's no longer a speed receiver. His yards per catch lifetime is 12.8. Definitely a possession receiver who can occasionally free up deep.
3 left feet Posted February 27, 2009 Posted February 27, 2009 pBills said: Again, not saying that I like the choice. I'd rather see them go after: T.J. Houshmandzadeh - Spend some money for ONCE or save a little bit of money and go after Washington or Henderson and help out the OL line with a possible big signing. IT'S NOT ABOUT THE MONEY!!! HOUSH ISNT COMING TO BUFFALO.....
seq004 Posted February 27, 2009 Posted February 27, 2009 pBills said: Great. I just don't like the choice. I would rather have TJ, but other than him who would you rather have other than Coles? he's number 2 at WR on my list.
DanInUticaTampa Posted February 27, 2009 Posted February 27, 2009 pBills said: Great. I just don't like the choice. that is your reason? you "just don't like it?" that is like "yeah, i don't care if a player is good and can upgrade the team. But.... i just don't like him for some odd reason i can't explain. i don't want him here"
Miyagi-Do Karate Posted February 27, 2009 Posted February 27, 2009 Jamie Nails said: git r dun I love how your screename is "Jamie Nails."
San Jose Bills Fan Posted February 27, 2009 Posted February 27, 2009 DanInUticaTampa said: that is your reason? you "just don't like it?" that is like "yeah, i don't care if a player is good and can upgrade the team. But.... i just don't like him for some odd reason i can't explain. i don't want him here" My ground rule for naysaying is "name your alternative scenario then." If not Coles, why? And who else instead and why?
pBills Posted February 27, 2009 Posted February 27, 2009 DanInUticaTampa said: that is your reason? you "just don't like it?" that is like "yeah, i don't care if a player is good and can upgrade the team. But.... i just don't like him for some odd reason i can't explain. i don't want him here" I have given my reason. I would rather see them bring in someone like Nate Washington or Henderson for a lesser amount and then spend money on the OL and hopefully re-sign Greer. We have more to worry about than just getting a #2 WR. And we all know that Ralph does not like to spend money in FA.
WellDressed Posted February 27, 2009 Posted February 27, 2009 pacpie said: wonder if he's inspected the restrooms yet. hope chris brown informs us if he approves Auto flush, auto faucets auto soap dispensers.
WellDressed Posted February 27, 2009 Posted February 27, 2009 JR In Ann Arbor said: I love how your screename is "Jamie Nails." So is his picture; I believe..
DanInUticaTampa Posted February 27, 2009 Posted February 27, 2009 pBills said: I have given my reason. I would rather see them bring in someone like Nate Washington or Henderson for a lesser amount and then spend money on the OL and hopefully re-sign Greer. We have more to worry about than just getting a #2 WR. And we all know that Ralph does not like to spend money in FA. We need at least a number 2 WR or a pass catching TE. This seems to be our best option. That is more important than greer. And i think we have enough mediocre players than to bring in washington and henderson. those are not upgrades.
Recommended Posts