Amstel Posted February 27, 2009 Share Posted February 27, 2009 It has to do with possibly appeasing Peters? I know he was making too much for his performance but the money the Bills saved is no big deal. I know they avoid paying him a 1.5 mil bonus or something but in renegotiating Peter's contract when they get around to it, having Dockery gone and not the highest paid lineman anymore won't hurt.....also sends a message that they will rid themselves of people who don't live up to their contracts. Just an idea. For what its worth I don't think the Bills are going to make a huge splash in FA. My guess is they sign a number of moderately priced FA's who are good but not great..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keepthefaith Posted February 27, 2009 Share Posted February 27, 2009 It has to do with possibly appeasing Peters? I know he was making too much for his performance but the money the Bills saved is no big deal. I know they avoid paying him a 1.5 mil bonus or something but in renegotiating Peter's contract when they get around to it, having Dockery gone and not the highest paid lineman anymore won't hurt.....also sends a message that they will rid themselves of people who don't live up to their contracts. Just an idea. For what its worth I don't think the Bills are going to make a huge splash in FA. My guess is they sign a number of moderately priced FA's who are good but not great..... The appeases Jason and Ralph. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ganesh Posted February 27, 2009 Share Posted February 27, 2009 It has to do with possibly appeasing Peters? I know he was making too much for his performance but the money the Bills saved is no big deal. I know they avoid paying him a 1.5 mil bonus or something but in renegotiating Peter's contract when they get around to it, having Dockery gone and not the highest paid lineman anymore won't hurt.....also sends a message that they will rid themselves of people who don't live up to their contracts. Just an idea. For what its worth I don't think the Bills are going to make a huge splash in FA. My guess is they sign a number of moderately priced FA's who are good but not great..... The reason to drop Dockery is not to appease Peters, but get out of a 49M Contract for a very average player. THe bills save about 27M of unpaid money to DOckery for the crap he put up on the field. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philly McButterpants Posted February 27, 2009 Share Posted February 27, 2009 It has to do with possibly appeasing Peters? I know he was making too much for his performance but the money the Bills saved is no big deal. I know they avoid paying him a 1.5 mil bonus or something but in renegotiating Peter's contract when they get around to it, having Dockery gone and not the highest paid lineman anymore won't hurt.....also sends a message that they will rid themselves of people who don't live up to their contracts. Just an idea. For what its worth I don't think the Bills are going to make a huge splash in FA. My guess is they sign a number of moderately priced FA's who are good but not great..... Could be . . . and nice avatar Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsNYC Posted February 27, 2009 Share Posted February 27, 2009 I think the better Dockery Gone question is....will his name be used like "Munsoned" The Bills got Dockery-ed again by signing that player. You bought that tv at Circuit City and now it doesn't work? Oh Man...you got Dockery-ed. She was banging your best friend? Jeez...She Dockery-ed you big time! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuckyFillUps Posted February 27, 2009 Share Posted February 27, 2009 We as fans get Dockery-ed each year around this time.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts