BillsNYC Posted February 20, 2009 Share Posted February 20, 2009 http://buffalonews.typepad.com/sully_on_sports/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kota Posted February 20, 2009 Share Posted February 20, 2009 It's just a big QQ session. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Tomcat Posted February 20, 2009 Share Posted February 20, 2009 [Comment From The Tomcat] Do you think Vilma would be a good fit for the Bills? Move Mitchell to the strong side and put Vilma as the Weakside backer? Does Poz have what it takes to stay in the middle? 1:51 Sully: I like Vilma. He's smart and a good playmaker. But he's not a classic outside backer, and I think Mitchell is weak wherever you put him. I don't know if Poz is above average inside or out. 1:51 [Comment From The Tomcat] Single Malt or Blend? 1:51 Sully: Single malt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scribo Posted February 20, 2009 Share Posted February 20, 2009 2:01 [Comment From The Tomcat] twobillsdrive.com.....check it out! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kota Posted February 20, 2009 Share Posted February 20, 2009 Yes Mitchell is a terrible player. Clearing Sully is very smart. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Tomcat Posted February 20, 2009 Share Posted February 20, 2009 2:01 [Comment From The Tomcat] twobillsdrive.com.....check it out! You got it!!!! Although I may not agree with everything he says, I do appreciate him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperKillerRobots Posted February 20, 2009 Share Posted February 20, 2009 Yes Mitchell is a terrible player. Clearing Sully is very smart. I think what he was driving at (and I think Sully's an ass too) was that Mitchell should be our 3rd best LB instead of our 2nd best or best. He gets exposed in space and has trouble keeping up with faster players. He's perfect for the WLB since he can hold up against the run and blitz. In our defense the WLB is the guy the play is directed to and should be free from blockers to make the play. He is good at that, but would be terrible on the SLB in pass coverage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Poland Posted February 20, 2009 Share Posted February 20, 2009 I think what he was driving at (and I think Sully's an ass too) was that Mitchell should be our 3rd best LB instead of our 2nd best or best. He gets exposed in space and has trouble keeping up with faster players. He's perfect for the WLB since he can hold up against the run and blitz. In our defense the WLB is the guy the play is directed to and should be free from blockers to make the play. He is good at that, but would be terrible on the SLB in pass coverage. No I don't think that's what he said or what he meant. Sullivan: "and I think Mitchell is weak wherever you put him" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts