Jump to content

Do We Go After Vilma?


H2o

Recommended Posts

There you go. The WLB doesn't cover in our defense. That's why Mitchell plays there.

By the way isn't that really weird? I don't know enough about football to criticize this but on every other team in the league a thumper like Mitchell would play the strong side and a speed guy like Ellison would play the weak side. I like Mitchell but his one great INT against San Diego aside, he looks very clunky in space.

 

Anyways, if they got Vilma, they should let him play the position that Derrick Brooks played in Tampa's Tampa 2 defense. That's seems like it would be a great fit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good. That's close but I think he'd get closer to $5 mil per. He made $4.2 million in the last year of his rookie deal last year. He was taken 12th overall in 2004 and was Defensive Rookie of the Year. He made the Pro Bowl in 2005. He's not a great player but pretty damn good and I think he fits our system well. He's damn fast, a bit small.

 

If we got him then we'd have to decide where he plays and where Poz plays. But at $5 mil per or thereabouts I like it.

 

If he would sign for that then it's basically the money we've decided to not pay Jabari Greer.

 

 

Screw poz! He is rotten. Poz gets his share of tackles but all of them are 5-10 yards down field. He's a great guy though with a never ending motor and a guy with great character. Just ask coach DICK

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Screw poz! He is rotten. Poz gets his share of tackles but all of them are 5-10 yards down field. He's a great guy though with a never ending motor and a guy with great character. Just ask coach DICK

 

Thankyou kind sir! Come next offseason Poz will be the new "most hated" guy on this roster. I really wish he could prove me wrong but I just don't see it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...