PromoTheRobot Posted February 19, 2009 Share Posted February 19, 2009 Served with papers but not in custody. This guy runs away when he's about to be charged with fraud in the billions of dollars, ala Madhoff. But when the FBI finds this guy, they serve him a summons and say "have a nice day!" If this guy robbed a bank of $500 the cops would have hauled him away in chains and called him a flight risk. PTR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thirdborn Posted February 19, 2009 Share Posted February 19, 2009 Served with papers but not in custody. This guy runs away when he's about to be charged with fraud in the billions of dollars, ala Madhoff. But when the FBI finds this guy, they serve him a summons and say "have a nice day!" If this guy robbed a bank of $500 the cops would have hauled him away in chains and called him a flight risk. PTR $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloBill Posted February 20, 2009 Share Posted February 20, 2009 Served with papers but not in custody. This guy runs away when he's about to be charged with fraud in the billions of dollars, ala Madhoff. But when the FBI finds this guy, they serve him a summons and say "have a nice day!" If this guy robbed a bank of $500 the cops would have hauled him away in chains and called him a flight risk. PTR In part because he has not been charged with a crime yet .... the more likely reality is that e has ingratiated himself to the political party in power and he has a lot of money. I am sure his legal team is already busy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted February 20, 2009 Share Posted February 20, 2009 Served with papers but not in custody. This guy runs away when he's about to be charged with fraud in the billions of dollars, ala Madhoff. But when the FBI finds this guy, they serve him a summons and say "have a nice day!" If this guy robbed a bank of $500 the cops would have hauled him away in chains and called him a flight risk. PTR Because you generally can't just arrest someone, you have to charge them with a crime. The real question in this case is: why isn't he charged with a crime yet? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerball Posted February 20, 2009 Share Posted February 20, 2009 Because you generally can't just arrest someone, you have to charge them with a crime. The real question in this case is: why isn't he charged with a crime yet? He's white. Whitey always wins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RayFinkle Posted February 20, 2009 Share Posted February 20, 2009 Can anybody tell me why this billion dollar dumbass is not in some country which does not have extradition? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloBill Posted February 20, 2009 Share Posted February 20, 2009 Can anybody tell me why this billion dollar dumbass is not in some country which does not have extradition? Because he believes he is above the law and has paid off enough politicians to keep himself safe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tcali Posted February 20, 2009 Share Posted February 20, 2009 Because he believes he is above the law and has paid off enough politicians to keep himself safe. they'll liquify 'all' his assetts--pay people back pennies on the dollar..-and he will go(after serving 18 months in the country club) somewhere where he has hidden 100 million...simple Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dean Posted February 20, 2009 Share Posted February 20, 2009 Because you generally can't just arrest someone, you have to charge them with a crime. The real question in this case is: why isn't he charged with a crime yet? The only thing I can thing of (at the moment) is the Feds tend to wait until they have an air-tight case, before they charge someone. Their conviction record supports that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted February 20, 2009 Share Posted February 20, 2009 The only thing I can thing of (at the moment) is the Feds tend to wait until they have an air-tight case, before they charge someone. Their conviction record supports that. I thing you might be right, but the thing is that the more thinging I thing about this thing, the more I thing there might be other things involved. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dean Posted February 20, 2009 Share Posted February 20, 2009 I thing you might be right, but the thing is that the more thinging I thing about this thing, the more I thing there might be other things involved. Damn fingers. Or, should I say, finkers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wooderson Posted February 20, 2009 Share Posted February 20, 2009 I thing you might be right, but the thing is that the more thinging I thing about this thing, the more I thing there might be other things involved. Wow, alliteration much. That sentence is quite a tongue twister. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fan in San Diego Posted February 21, 2009 Share Posted February 21, 2009 The papers served were for a civil matter, not a criminal. You don't go to jail for civil matters. Now if the SEC files charges after investigating, then he can go to jail. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts