Chump Change Posted February 9, 2009 Posted February 9, 2009 http://warner.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/02/05...st-a-president/
Gene Frenkle Posted February 9, 2009 Posted February 9, 2009 Did you notice the word 'blogs' in the url or the OPINION headline at the top of the page or does your indignant outrage blind you to such things?
Chump Change Posted February 10, 2009 Author Posted February 10, 2009 Did you notice the word 'blogs' in the url or the OPINION headline at the top of the page or does your indignant outrage blind you to such things? Indignant Outrage? C'mon Genie Freckle, it was merely scarcasm directed at that joke of a paper. John Adams was correct (BTW, nice job parrot), that it was a blog and not a column. Yes, I should've noticed that prior to posting. As far as indignant outrage is concerned, I save that for the complete selling out of our nations future with this schit sandwich your peeps are trying to pass as beef. Have a nice day parrot boy.
Jim in Anchorage Posted February 10, 2009 Posted February 10, 2009 I don't give a crap if it was a blog,or the front page of the wall street journal-that was gross.
SageAgainstTheMachine Posted February 10, 2009 Posted February 10, 2009 I don't give a crap if it was a blog,or the front page of the wall street journal-that was gross. Yeah, since it's an opinion piece, I don't file it under "journalism". But damn, it was a weird (and pointless) opinion piece. Why does she insist on sexualizing the first family like that?
Philly McButterpants Posted February 10, 2009 Posted February 10, 2009 That was truly nausea inducing . . .
Recommended Posts