Armchair GM Posted February 9, 2009 Posted February 9, 2009 Scenario #1. AZ needs a LT BADLY, to replace Gandy. We have one and need an elite WR to complimant Evans' deep threat...som, trade Peters and swap 1st's with AZ for Bolden...spend the $$, Bolden fits perfectly with a check down offense as he can create yardage after the catch. Scenario #2. Baltimore will be in need of a CB, as they won't be able to hold on to both, or either for that matter, of thiers. We need a dominant OLB...so, trade Mcgee and swap firsts with Baltimore for Suggs. (assuming we re-sign Greer.) Scenario #3. Folllow 1 & 2 until you get to swapping 1st's w/baltimore, make both trade, but give baltimore McGee and our 3rd, then trade Lil' Roscoe and our 5th for someone's 3rd rd pick. There is Genious in this post, I know it! On the contrary, if there is, it's too smart for the Bills' front office.
DreamOnDan Posted February 9, 2009 Posted February 9, 2009 Scenario #1. AZ needs a LT BADLY, to replace Gandy. We have one and need an elite WR to complimant Evans' deep threat...som, trade Peters with AZ for Boldin There is Genious in this post, I know it! On the contrary, if there is, it's too smart for the Bills' front office. now I love it!
Beerball Posted February 9, 2009 Posted February 9, 2009 Wouldn't it be more correct if your final sentence read: "On the other hand, if there is..."?
Magox Posted February 9, 2009 Posted February 9, 2009 Scenario #1. AZ needs a LT BADLY, to replace Gandy. We have one and need an elite WR to complimant Evans' deep threat...som, trade Peters and swap 1st's with AZ for Bolden...spend the $$, Bolden fits perfectly with a check down offense as he can create yardage after the catch. Scenario #2. Baltimore will be in need of a CB, as they won't be able to hold on to both, or either for that matter, of thiers. We need a dominant OLB...so, trade Mcgee and swap firsts with Baltimore for Suggs. (assuming we re-sign Greer.) Scenario #3. Folllow 1 & 2 until you get to swapping 1st's w/baltimore, make both trade, but give baltimore McGee and our 3rd, then trade Lil' Roscoe and our 5th for someone's 3rd rd pick. There is Genious in this post, I know it! On the contrary, if there is, it's too smart for the Bills' front office. As much as I would love to have Suggs, he is a Free Agent so he will go to the highest bidder. Another interesting scenario is trading Mcgee for Winslow. They need a DB badly, we have a few, they are getting tired of Winslow and we need one badly. Makes sense to me
lets_go_bills Posted February 9, 2009 Posted February 9, 2009 Scenario #1. AZ needs a LT BADLY, to replace Gandy. We have one and need an elite WR to complimant Evans' deep threat...som, trade Peters and swap 1st's with AZ for Bolden...spend the $$, Bolden fits perfectly with a check down offense as he can create yardage after the catch. Scenario #2. Baltimore will be in need of a CB, as they won't be able to hold on to both, or either for that matter, of thiers. We need a dominant OLB...so, trade Mcgee and swap firsts with Baltimore for Suggs. (assuming we re-sign Greer.) Scenario #3. Folllow 1 & 2 until you get to swapping 1st's w/baltimore, make both trade, but give baltimore McGee and our 3rd, then trade Lil' Roscoe and our 5th for someone's 3rd rd pick. There is Genious in this post, I know it! On the contrary, if there is, it's too smart for the Bills' front office. Boldin not Bolden. Trades like this are so incredibly uncommon. And yet here we have another trade Peters thread that is also a trade for Boldin thread!
nucci Posted February 9, 2009 Posted February 9, 2009 Scenario #1. AZ needs a LT BADLY, to replace Gandy. We have one and need an elite WR to complimant Evans' deep threat...som, trade Peters and swap 1st's with AZ for Bolden...spend the $$, Bolden fits perfectly with a check down offense as he can create yardage after the catch. Scenario #2. Baltimore will be in need of a CB, as they won't be able to hold on to both, or either for that matter, of thiers. We need a dominant OLB...so, trade Mcgee and swap firsts with Baltimore for Suggs. (assuming we re-sign Greer.) Scenario #3. Folllow 1 & 2 until you get to swapping 1st's w/baltimore, make both trade, but give baltimore McGee and our 3rd, then trade Lil' Roscoe and our 5th for someone's 3rd rd pick. There is Genious in this post, I know it! On the contrary, if there is, it's too smart for the Bills' front office. Who plays LT so Edwards will have time to throw to Boldin? Please don't say Chambers or Walker.
IndyJay1234 Posted February 9, 2009 Posted February 9, 2009 Scenario #1. AZ needs a LT BADLY, to replace Gandy. We have one and need an elite WR to complimant Evans' deep threat...som, trade Peters and swap 1st's with AZ for Bolden...spend the $$, Bolden fits perfectly with a check down offense as he can create yardage after the catch. Scenario #2. Baltimore will be in need of a CB, as they won't be able to hold on to both, or either for that matter, of thiers. We need a dominant OLB...so, trade Mcgee and swap firsts with Baltimore for Suggs. (assuming we re-sign Greer.) Scenario #3. Folllow 1 & 2 until you get to swapping 1st's w/baltimore, make both trade, but give baltimore McGee and our 3rd, then trade Lil' Roscoe and our 5th for someone's 3rd rd pick. There is Genious in this post, I know it! On the contrary, if there is, it's too smart for the Bills' front office. You are not allowed to use "there is Genious in this post" if you cant spell Genius..
nucci Posted February 9, 2009 Posted February 9, 2009 You are not allowed to use "there is Genious in this post" if you cant spell Genius.. or Boldin!!!
Beerball Posted February 9, 2009 Posted February 9, 2009 You are not allowed to use "there is Genious in this post" if you cant spell Genius.. On the contrary, I think he can.
toddgurley Posted February 9, 2009 Posted February 9, 2009 As much as I would love to have Suggs, he is a Free Agent so he will go to the highest bidder. Another interesting scenario is trading Mcgee for Winslow. They need a DB badly, we have a few, they are getting tired of Winslow and we need one badly. Makes sense to me Mcgee could only be traded assuming me re-sign greer, and I dont think that will happen. Although I would love to re-sign Greer and trade Mcgee for a stud TE like Winslow-even if he does have some bagagge. But trades in the NFL seem to be rare. compared to trades in other leagues
ddaryl Posted February 9, 2009 Posted February 9, 2009 Why would we have to swaps 1st and trade Peters for Boldin.. A probowl LT is worth more then any WR playing the game. In fact Arizona should give us something on top of Peters to take Boldin off their hands
The Senator Posted February 9, 2009 Posted February 9, 2009 Why would we have to swaps 1st and trade Peters for Boldin.. A probowl LT is worth more then any WR playing the game. In fact Arizona should give us something on top of Peters to take Boldin off their hands i'd love to have a pro-bowl LT - but i don't think miami will trade us jake long
SKOOBY Posted February 9, 2009 Posted February 9, 2009 Why would we have to swaps 1st and trade Peters for Boldin.. A probowl LT is worth more then any WR playing the game. In fact Arizona should give us something on top of Peters to take Boldin off their hands Agreed, we are swapping near even merchandise. Maybe they exchange 3rd's but no more.
BUFFALOTONE Posted February 9, 2009 Posted February 9, 2009 Who plays LT so Edwards will have time to throw to Boldin? Please don't say Chambers or Walker. Beat me too it. its hard to throw the ball when you are sitting on your ass.
Numark Posted February 9, 2009 Posted February 9, 2009 boldin would be useless without a decent LT. Why create more holes than necessary, i dont get it.
Cookiemonster Posted February 9, 2009 Posted February 9, 2009 Boldin not Bolden. Trades like this are so incredibly uncommon. And yet here we have another trade Peters thread that is also a trade for Boldin thread! Makes perfect sense to me, Bolden wants out badly, we know Peters was, is, and will be a malcontent, I like it. We will find someone to play LT, and probably not miss a beat, he should be able to allow under 11.5 sacks.
San-O Posted February 9, 2009 Posted February 9, 2009 Who plays LT so Edwards will have time to throw to Boldin? Please don't say Chambers or Walker. Peters gave up more sacks than anyone in the NFL this year at left tackle, like 10.5. He was ranked 32'nd in sacks.
Magox Posted February 9, 2009 Posted February 9, 2009 Peters is a probowler. Pay the man his money and everything will work out. Don't pay him, and things won't workout. Simple as that!!
SnakeOiler Posted February 9, 2009 Posted February 9, 2009 I would rather have J Peters than Q Boldin. A Pro Bowl LT is worth double a pro-bowl WR
Recommended Posts