DIE HARD 1967 Posted February 2, 2009 Posted February 2, 2009 http://www.profootballhof.com/hof/selectionprocess.html At Least 80% of the votes were for Ralph.
Trader Posted February 3, 2009 Posted February 3, 2009 http://www.profootballhof.com/hof/selectionprocess.html At Least 80% of the votes were for Ralph. The answer to your question is in Jerry Sullivan's column this morning. It's an excellent analysis of what went down.
bladiebla Posted February 3, 2009 Posted February 3, 2009 The answer to your question is in Jerry Sullivan's column this morning. It's an excellent analysis of what went down. Which can be found here (good read): http://www.buffalonews.com/opinion/columns...ory/568057.html
BillsWatch Posted February 3, 2009 Posted February 3, 2009 http://www.profootballhof.com/hof/selectionprocess.html At Least 80% of the votes were for Ralph. At least 80% of the voters were smarter than you?
DIE HARD 1967 Posted February 3, 2009 Author Posted February 3, 2009 At least 80% of the voters were smarter than you? And how do you know that? I am not very impressed with you so far either
todd Posted February 3, 2009 Posted February 3, 2009 http://www.profootballhof.com/hof/selectionprocess.html At Least 80% of the votes were for Ralph. In my informal research, I've found that people who hate Ralph generally had a steady diet of lead paint chips as a child, which may explain some of the convoluted grasp of reality.
DIE HARD 1967 Posted February 3, 2009 Author Posted February 3, 2009 In my informal research, I've found that people who hate Ralph generally had a steady diet of lead paint chips as a child, which may explain some of the convoluted grasp of reality. Actually, I have no problem with the selection. the timing sux though
Recommended Posts