finknottle Posted January 31, 2009 Posted January 31, 2009 $140,000 apparently. http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/j...hle-nomination/ Change you can believe in. Fool me once (2000), shame on you. Fool me twice (2004), shame on me. Fool me a third time (2008), I deserve what I get.
Keukasmallie Posted January 31, 2009 Posted January 31, 2009 The costs of recent Senate appointees isn't measured in dollars as much as they are measured, IMHO, in the net loss of credibility of our political system.
Kingfish Posted January 31, 2009 Posted January 31, 2009 Let me get this straight- for as long as I can remember the right wingers have been saying that the tax code is too complicated and needs to be simplified yet they are now outraged because a Democrat has proved their point? They should be thrilled. They should deck him out in Wranglers and flannels and trot him out on the campaign trail as "Tom the HHS Secretary", just an everday salt of the earth guy who has been hurt by the lack of a flat tax.
Recommended Posts