ieatcrayonz Posted January 14, 2009 Posted January 14, 2009 I can't remember his name and don't know if he is any good but if the Bills draft for need he could be our guy. Will he be there at #11?
Bill from NYC Posted January 14, 2009 Posted January 14, 2009 I can't remember his name and don't know if he is any good but if the Bills draft for need he could be our guy. Will he be there at #11? No need to waste a #11. They can use that pick on a skill player, and jump back in and pick him later in round 1 by giving up a 2nd and a 5th, Then, you will be satisfied once again, even if he stinks for 5 years.
ieatcrayonz Posted January 14, 2009 Author Posted January 14, 2009 No need to waste a #11. They can use that pick on a skill player, and jump back in and pick him later in round 1 by giving up a 2nd and a 5th, Then, you will be satisfied once again, even if he stinks for 5 years. Look, I purposely avoided getting into the trade up trade down scenarios. I am sure some people will say we can trade down and still get him. You say trade up but do it later. All of that stuff is complicated. Like I said, I don't know if he is any good. So if he is there at #11 do we take him based on need? I doubt we would ever trade up for anyone because Jerry Sullivan said Ralph is cheap. If not will he be there in round 2? I doubt it based on his skills. I just tried to keep it simple.
Bill from NYC Posted January 14, 2009 Posted January 14, 2009 Look, I purposely avoided getting into the trade up trade down scenarios. I am sure some people will say we can trade down and still get him. You say trade up but do it later. All of that stuff is complicated. Like I said, I don't know if he is any good. So if he is there at #11 do we take him based on need? I doubt we would ever trade up for anyone because Jerry Sullivan said Ralph is cheap. If not will he be there in round 2? I doubt it based on his skills. I just tried to keep it simple.
BillsObserver Posted January 14, 2009 Posted January 14, 2009 Nate Davis didn't do himself any favors in his last 2 games with Ball State..
The Senator Posted January 14, 2009 Posted January 14, 2009 Look, I purposely avoided getting into the trade up trade down scenarios. I am sure some people will say we can trade down and still get him. You say trade up but do it later. All of that stuff is complicated. Like I said, I don't know if he is any good. So if he is there at #11 do we take him based on need? I doubt we would ever trade up for anyone because Jerry Sullivan said Ralph is cheap. If not will he be there in round 2? I doubt it based on his skills. I just tried to keep it simple. Does he wear gloves and love Dakota Fanning? I tend to agree with Bill - no need to trade down. If he really stinks, is afraid of cold and snow, can't take a hit, and hasn't finished a season since high school, he'll probably be there for us in round 3.
PromoTheRobot Posted January 14, 2009 Posted January 14, 2009 The guys name is Nate Davis and if you actually saw his last few games you would not want him as a Bill at any round. Do you know he has a learning issue that makes hard to understand his playbook? Drew Willy would be a better choice. PTR
Beerball Posted January 14, 2009 Posted January 14, 2009 A QB from a school founded by canning jar magnets isn't nearly as impressive as a QB from a school founded by a robber baron.
Johnny Coli Posted January 14, 2009 Posted January 14, 2009 I can't remember his name and don't know if he is any good but if the Bills draft for need he could be our guy. Will he be there at #11? They should pick a QB in every round and let'em fight it out in the camp/pre-season with Trent Christ. We all know that all the team's ills are directly related to the QB, so let's load up on them and increase the odds of finding the next franchise QB.
ieatcrayonz Posted January 14, 2009 Author Posted January 14, 2009 They should pick a QB in every round and let'em fight it out in the camp/pre-season with Trent Christ. We all know that all the team's ills are directly related to the QB, so let's load up on them and increase the odds of finding the next franchise QB. I don't thik they should pick all QBs although we need at least two. I have never seen him play but he declared early. That puts him ahead of Trent for starters. Plus, the first 5 letters of his school name are obviously lost on Trent. Overall, I am just wondering if the Bills willl draft for need or talent. Although I have never seen him play or read anything about his game, this guy seems to fit both need and overall talent. I don't see how we can go wrong.
Cereal Posted January 14, 2009 Posted January 14, 2009 They should pick a QB in every round and let'em fight it out in the camp/pre-season with Trent Christ. We all know that all the team's ills are directly related to the QB, so let's load up on them and increase the odds of finding the next franchise QB. Ha! Love it! Yeah, not sure we need to be spending a first round pick on a QB... especially Davis.
todd Posted January 14, 2009 Posted January 14, 2009 Great idea! Let's spend a 1st rounder on a position that isn't as much a need as others! That's friggin brilliant! Mensa must be proud of whatever brilliant mind came up with that idea.
BuffaloBill Posted January 14, 2009 Posted January 14, 2009 he has a learning issue that makes hard to understand his playbook? But he is “A very tough guy, hard working guy, loves the game, studies the game. He's very, very into football. It's important to him.” He'll fit right in
Dan III Posted January 14, 2009 Posted January 14, 2009 I don't thik they should pick all QBs although we need at least two. I have never seen him play but he declared early. That puts him ahead of Trent for starters. Plus, the first 5 letters of his school name are obviously lost on Trent.
Fan in Chicago Posted January 14, 2009 Posted January 14, 2009 Overall, I am just wondering if the Bills willl draft for need or talent. Why wait for a latter round and lose the player rated so highly on our boards ? I rather run the risk of being accused of reaching for him (assuming it is a male) than missing out all together.
ieatcrayonz Posted January 14, 2009 Author Posted January 14, 2009 Great idea! Let's spend a 1st rounder on a position that isn't as much a need as others! That's friggin brilliant! Mensa must be proud of whatever brilliant mind came up with that idea. You're right. No team really NEEDS a qb that can throw the ball 9 yards.
Fan in Chicago Posted January 14, 2009 Posted January 14, 2009 You're right. No team really NEEDS a qb that can throw the ball 9 yards. Is this a joke ? If you have been watching the games, you would know we desperately need a QB that can complete passes beyond the line of scrimmage.
Beerball Posted January 14, 2009 Posted January 14, 2009 You're right. No team really NEEDS a qb that can throw the ball 9 yards. Why would Carlos Mansa give a rip about the Bills 1st round pick? He a fan?
ieatcrayonz Posted January 14, 2009 Author Posted January 14, 2009 Is this a joke ? If you have been watching the games, you would know we desperately need a QB that can complete passes beyond the line of scrimmage. It's not a joke. Todd convinced me. Who needs a QB from Ball S. when you have one from Los Gatos?
BuffaloBaumer Posted January 14, 2009 Posted January 14, 2009 what I can't believe is the same people on this board buy into these threads EVERY SINGLE TIME. It has gone from comical to you gotta be kidding me!
Recommended Posts