Rico Posted January 12, 2009 Share Posted January 12, 2009 You mean, MVP Chump, Peyton? No, I mean Big Game Chump Peyton. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dean Posted January 12, 2009 Share Posted January 12, 2009 No, I mean Big Game Chump Peyton. He has been on the winning end of far more wins, than he has losses, in "Big Games". Of course, you probably don't quite get what a "Big Game" really is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Posted January 12, 2009 Share Posted January 12, 2009 He has been on the winning end of far more wins, than he has losses, in "Big Games". Of course, you probably don't quite get what a "Big Game" really is. He is a loser....on par with Jim Kelly.....oh, wait Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rico Posted January 12, 2009 Share Posted January 12, 2009 He has been on the winning end of far more wins, than he has losses, in "Big Games". Of course, you probably don't quite get what a "Big Game" really is.Colts are 7-8 with him as starter in the playoffs. You probably should drain the grease from between your ears. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Posted January 12, 2009 Share Posted January 12, 2009 Colts are 7-8 with him as starter in the playoffs. You probably should drain the grease from between your ears. Thats 15 playoff games they've been in with him at QB.......thats pretty good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dean Posted January 12, 2009 Share Posted January 12, 2009 Colts are 7-8 with him as starter in the playoffs. You probably should drain the grease from between your ears. No games during the season count as Big Games? How the fuc# does a team get to the playoffs without winning some "Big Games". See, I was right...you don't get it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Posted January 12, 2009 Share Posted January 12, 2009 No games during the season count as Big Games? How the fuc# does a team get to the playoffs without winning some "Big Games". See, I was right...you don't get it. Actually, you don't get it- if you subtract all the big games he has won, then look at the big games he has won, there aren't any....get it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MDH Posted January 12, 2009 Share Posted January 12, 2009 Colts are 7-8 with him as starter in the playoffs. You probably should drain the grease from between your ears. Do you realize what that record means? The Colts usually get the #1 or #2 seed. Having a .500 record when you pretty much always get one of those seeds means you're consistently playing in the AFC Championship game - and occasionally in the Super Bowl. I'll take a QB like that any day. That team wins because of Manning - period. I think you'd be wiser to trash somebody else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dean Posted January 12, 2009 Share Posted January 12, 2009 Do you realize what that record means? The Colts usually get the #1 or #2 seed. Having a .500 record when you pretty much always get one of those seeds means you're consistently playing in the AFC Championship game - and occasionally in the Super Bowl. I'll take a QB like that any day. That team wins because of Manning - period. I think you'd be wiser to trash somebody else. Apparently, it is possible to make the playoffs, year after year, yet win no Big Games during the season. Stunning stupidity! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts