BLZFAN4LIFE Posted January 6, 2009 Posted January 6, 2009 #23. No one works harder or cares more. That's what really matters.
mjohns85 Posted January 6, 2009 Posted January 6, 2009 Lynch is the best player imo. If everyone gave the effort he did on Sundays we would be in the superbowl. enough said
WilliamCody Posted January 7, 2009 Posted January 7, 2009 Best defensive play maker: Leodis (already) Best offensive play maker: Marshawn IMO the only elite players at their position the Bills have are Jason Peters and Brian Moorman
vincec Posted January 7, 2009 Posted January 7, 2009 It depends on what you mean by "best". If you mean MVP, then it's Trent Edwards. Just look at the games that he missed. Our office absolutely went into the tank. The same can't be said when Peters or Lynch were missing and Evans can't do anything without a QB. If you mean the best at his position compared to other players in the league, then I say Moorman.
Miyagi-Do Karate Posted January 7, 2009 Posted January 7, 2009 Gentlemen, Hold off on your praises for McKelvin. I intend to get a McKelvin jersey, which means that his demise is imminent.
BuffaloRebound Posted January 7, 2009 Posted January 7, 2009 Lynch and McKelvin. I don't know enough about offensive line play to put Peters on that list. Evans is also hard to grade with the QB situation. Same goes for Stroud because the defensive end play was the worst in the League.
billybob Posted January 7, 2009 Posted January 7, 2009 Most talented player at his position Peters Best value for the money Fred Jackson Most valuable player - this is hard- I was trying to think which player being absent would hurt this team most- I'd hate to see the defense without Stroud or the offense without Evans.
Dibs Posted January 7, 2009 Posted January 7, 2009 HAHA...Bill, you are consistent. Peters..athletically hmmm..maybe..but as a total package he is far from the top. IMHO. Teehee, that's funny. You knock somebody's choice who happens to be considered at the top of his position by many(thus making it a reasonable selection for best player on the team).......and your own choice is the backup RB.
Tcali Posted January 7, 2009 Posted January 7, 2009 It depends on what you mean by "best". If you mean MVP, then it's Trent Edwards. Just look at the games that he missed. Our office absolutely went into the tank. The same can't be said when Peters or Lynch were missing and Evans can't do anything without a QB. If you mean the best at his position compared to other players in the league, then I say Moorman. good point...but QBs are often the MVPs --with rare exceptions
Circlingthewagons Posted January 7, 2009 Posted January 7, 2009 While other players might be more important to the success of our team, Moorman is better at punting than Lynch is at running and Evans is at receiving etc.... He does his job better than anyone else.
Tcali Posted January 7, 2009 Posted January 7, 2009 Most talented player at his position Peters Best value for the money Fred Jackson Most valuable player - this is hard- I was trying to think which player being absent would hurt this team most- I'd hate to see the defense without Stroud or the offense without Evans. why was Jackson running off with the ball at the end of the first half against NE??? should an IQ test be involved in this decision?
THE GASH STATION Posted January 7, 2009 Author Posted January 7, 2009 Teehee, that's funny.You knock somebody's choice who happens to be considered at the top of his position by many(thus making it a reasonable selection for best player on the team).......and your own choice is the backup RB. I wasn't knocking his choice..just commenting on his consistent nature (Bill From NYC). And, yes..my choice is the back up RB. I take it your defense of Bill's choice is your opinion of the best player on the team...(Peters) Well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man
CFLstyle Posted January 7, 2009 Posted January 7, 2009 I like Peters, McKelvin, and Evans. Evans has been getting no credit at all, his time will come.
cantankerous Posted January 7, 2009 Posted January 7, 2009 why was Jackson running off with the ball at the end of the first half against NE???should an IQ test be involved in this decision? If you hadn't noticed the officials had a "kicking ball" already placed by the time Jackson was running off with the football. The play was explained on NFL network by the VP of officiating...so it really didn't matter that Head ran off with the ball.
mborn Posted January 7, 2009 Posted January 7, 2009 Lynch is the best player imo. If everyone gave the effort he did on Sundays we would be in the superbowl. couldn't have said it better
Recommended Posts