gmac17 Posted December 29, 2008 Share Posted December 29, 2008 not that it matters, but on the punt in the first half should that have been a safety for the pats? It clearly touched Rosco, or am I missing a rule? surprised they didn't challenge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Griffin Posted December 29, 2008 Share Posted December 29, 2008 not that it matters, but on the punt in the first half should that have been a safety for the pats? It clearly touched Rosco, or am I missing a rule? surprised they didn't challenge. it touched a Patriot player after Mckelvin "may" have touched it, then a Bill recovered it in the End Zone.....no need for Bellicheck to challenge Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apuszczalowski Posted December 29, 2008 Share Posted December 29, 2008 it touched a Patriot player after Mckelvin "may" have touched it, then a Bill recovered it in the End Zone.....no need for Bellicheck to challenge He did touch it, you could see his fingers get pushed back when it hit the ball Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
silvermike Posted December 29, 2008 Share Posted December 29, 2008 Say it was clear that McKelvin had touched it, and it rolled out of the end zone. Is that, by rule, a safety? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Poeticlaw Posted December 29, 2008 Share Posted December 29, 2008 Say it was clear that McKelvin had touched it, and it rolled out of the end zone. Is that, by rule, a safety? A patriot player clearly touched before being recoevered in the endzone if the Patriot player did not touch the ball it would have been a safety but since they did it was a touchback. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts