thebandit27 Posted December 26, 2008 Posted December 26, 2008 YOU CANNOT TRADE THE ENTIRE ROSTER FOR FIRST ROUND PICKS EVEN IF YOU COULD, I DOUBT WE'D BE ABLE TO AFFORD THE SALARIES OF 32 FIRST ROUND PICKS STOP PINING OVER THE IDEA OF TRADING EVERY PLAYER ON THE ROSTER FOR A FIRST ROUND PICK THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME
stuckincincy Posted December 26, 2008 Posted December 26, 2008 YOU CANNOT TRADE THE ENTIRE ROSTER FOR FIRST ROUND PICKS EVEN IF YOU COULD, I DOUBT WE'D BE ABLE TO AFFORD THE SALARIES OF 32 FIRST ROUND PICKS STOP PINING OVER THE IDEA OF TRADING EVERY PLAYER ON THE ROSTER FOR A FIRST ROUND PICK THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME Well..that's your opinion!
thebandit27 Posted December 26, 2008 Author Posted December 26, 2008 Well..that's your opinion! yes, uninformed as it may be
The Senator Posted December 26, 2008 Posted December 26, 2008 YOU CANNOT TRADE THE ENTIRE ROSTER FOR FIRST ROUND PICKS EVEN IF YOU COULD, I DOUBT WE'D BE ABLE TO AFFORD THE SALARIES OF 32 FIRST ROUND PICKS STOP PINING OVER THE IDEA OF TRADING EVERY PLAYER ON THE ROSTER FOR A FIRST ROUND PICK THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME Gee, you're smart. Now see if you can figure out how to turn 'Caps Lock' off.
BobDVA Posted December 26, 2008 Posted December 26, 2008 But that would leave most with nothing to say!
Steely Dan Posted December 26, 2008 Posted December 26, 2008 YOU CANNOT TRADE THE ENTIRE ROSTER FOR FIRST ROUND PICKS EVEN IF YOU COULD, I DOUBT WE'D BE ABLE TO AFFORD THE SALARIES OF 32 FIRST ROUND PICKS STOP PINING OVER THE IDEA OF TRADING EVERY PLAYER ON THE ROSTER FOR A FIRST ROUND PICK THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME Unfortunately, there are a lot of people who will never get it. They also don't understand that even if the Bills had all 32 picks in the first round a lot of them would be washouts.
thebandit27 Posted December 26, 2008 Author Posted December 26, 2008 Gee, you're smart. Now see if you can figure out how to turn 'Caps Lock' off. thank goodness you were able to come up with a quality retort like that. that added a lot to the discussion here. thanks!
Steely Dan Posted December 26, 2008 Posted December 26, 2008 Gee, you're smart. Now see if you can figure out how to turn 'Caps Lock' off. It had to be done because the people it's meant for really need it in caps.
marauderswr80 Posted December 26, 2008 Posted December 26, 2008 I still think if we traded Blake Constanzo we would be able to get at least a 1st, 3rd & 5th for him.......
thebandit27 Posted December 26, 2008 Author Posted December 26, 2008 I still think if we traded Blake Constanzo we would be able to get at least a 1st, 3rd & 5th for him....... yes! ROFL
thebandit27 Posted December 26, 2008 Author Posted December 26, 2008 Little too much eggnog here... not sure I understand what you mean, but I do like eggnog!
The Senator Posted December 26, 2008 Posted December 26, 2008 thank goodness you were able to come up with a quality retort like that. that added a lot to the discussion here. thanks! I'm sorry - did you think your post would provoke profound discourse?
Hazed and Amuzed Posted December 26, 2008 Posted December 26, 2008 YOU CANNOT TRADE THE ENTIRE ROSTER FOR FIRST ROUND PICKS EVEN IF YOU COULD, I DOUBT WE'D BE ABLE TO AFFORD THE SALARIES OF 32 FIRST ROUND PICKS STOP PINING OVER THE IDEA OF TRADING EVERY PLAYER ON THE ROSTER FOR A FIRST ROUND PICK THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME WRONG!!!!!!!! I do it in Madden all the time
thebandit27 Posted December 26, 2008 Author Posted December 26, 2008 I'm sorry - did you think your would provoke profound discourse? everyone really ratchets up the vocabulary once the integrity of their post is questioned; i find it amusing. profound discourse, no, but something better than "that was in all caps" would be appreciated. i am aware that it was in all caps; that was done for emphasis. sometimes, people will change the type, font, etc. of their post to convey a certain type of feeling to the reader. often times, the reader understands this, but in some cases, the emphasis is lost. your case would be the latter. hope that clears things up for you. now, go back to the senate and come up with a solution to the financial crisis.
The Senator Posted December 26, 2008 Posted December 26, 2008 everyone really ratchets up the vocabulary once the integrity of their post is questioned; i find it amusing. profound discourse, no, but something better than "that was in all caps" would be appreciated. i am aware that it was in all caps; that was done for emphasis. sometimes, people will change the type, font, etc. of their post to convey a certain type of feeling to the reader. often times, the reader understands this, but in some cases, the emphasis is lost. your case would be the latter. hope that clears things up for you. now, go back to the senate and come up with a solution to the financial crisis. how's this for 'ratcheting up the vocabulary'... blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah.... that's about the gist of what you're saying, yes?
Jim in Anchorage Posted December 26, 2008 Posted December 26, 2008 not sure I understand what you mean, but I do like eggnog! all these remarks make sense. Like me yesterday,after drinking to much eggnog.
thebandit27 Posted December 27, 2008 Author Posted December 27, 2008 how's this for 'ratcheting up the vocabulary'... blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah.... that's about the gist of what you're saying, yes? refer to previous post regarding the intelligent, well-placed retort.
Beerball Posted December 27, 2008 Posted December 27, 2008 Unfortunately, there are a lot of people who will never get it. They also don't understand that even if the Bills had all 32 picks in the first round a lot of them would be washouts. busts, they would be busts, not washouts
Recommended Posts