Tcali Posted December 21, 2008 Posted December 21, 2008 They would be 13-3 right now. Nice coaching choice AJ.Everyone in the world new better except you.
silvermike Posted December 22, 2008 Posted December 22, 2008 What would they be with Marty? That was the real choice.
Tcali Posted December 22, 2008 Author Posted December 22, 2008 What would they be with Marty? That was the real choice. 11-5
Rico Posted December 22, 2008 Posted December 22, 2008 Congrats to the Chargers, they get a chance to salvage their season after getting Hoculi-ed by that POS in Week 2. Glad to see the Bills play a part in setting this rematch up.
BillnutinHouston Posted December 22, 2008 Posted December 22, 2008 They would be 13-3 right now. Nice coaching choice AJ.Everyone in the world new better except you. Only on TBD can you find someone who would use the word "new" in this post and still sound condescending.
Tcali Posted December 22, 2008 Author Posted December 22, 2008 Only on TBD can you find someone who would use the word "new" in this post and still sound condescending. new is right
BillsObserver Posted December 22, 2008 Posted December 22, 2008 They would be 13-3 right now. Nice coaching choice AJ.Everyone in the world new better except you. 1) Knew. 2) Bellicheat wasn't an option and won't be. Why would you even bring up his name???
Tcali Posted December 22, 2008 Author Posted December 22, 2008 1) Knew. 2) Bellicheat wasn't an option and won't be. Why would you even bring up his name??? no its new--look it up in the diccionery
BillsObserver Posted December 22, 2008 Posted December 22, 2008 no its new--look it up in the diccionery OK, we get it. Stupid gimmick.
Tcali Posted December 22, 2008 Author Posted December 22, 2008 OK, we get it. Stupid gimmick. its not a gimmick...im just so happy for your spelling corrections
BillsObserver Posted December 22, 2008 Posted December 22, 2008 its not a gimmick...im just so happy for your spelling corrections You're the idiot who started this thread. Sorry but it stinks.
I 90 Posted December 22, 2008 Posted December 22, 2008 Why would they even want to be 13-3 ? That never helped Marty any. Expectations make for unemployment (ask Jauron on New Years Day).
BuffaninATL Posted December 22, 2008 Posted December 22, 2008 no its new--look it up in the diccionery you try to defend yourself then spell dictionary as "diccionery"? Who is "Bellichex" ? LAME
Tcali Posted December 22, 2008 Author Posted December 22, 2008 you try to defend yourself then spell dictionary as "diccionery"? Who is "Bellichex" ? LAME thats the old english root of the word
Steely Dan Posted December 22, 2008 Posted December 22, 2008 Only on TBD can you find someone who would use the word "new" in this post and still sound condescending. new is right
BuffaninATL Posted December 22, 2008 Posted December 22, 2008 thats the old english root of the word oh really? last time I checked it's 2009... is "Bellichex" the old Croatian root of the name..?
Tcali Posted December 22, 2008 Author Posted December 22, 2008 oh really? last time I checked it's 2009... is "Bellichex" the old Croatian root of the name..? or did i confuse that with some cereal i was thinking about?...hmmm
Steely Dan Posted December 22, 2008 Posted December 22, 2008 oh really? last time I checked it's 2009... is "Bellichex" the old Croatian root of the name..? Bellichex is the cereal they sell in Boston. It's stale, crusty and tasteless.
Tcali Posted December 22, 2008 Author Posted December 22, 2008 Bellichex is the cereal they sell in Boston. It's stale, crusty and tasteless. and i was thinking the name was from the stonehenge times--from the druids....but yeah i remember the taste now--yukk
Big Turk Posted December 22, 2008 Posted December 22, 2008 What would they be with Marty? That was the real choice. didn't matter if they were 16-0 with Schottenheimer...everyone knew they were out in their first playoff game...
Recommended Posts