billsfreak Posted December 17, 2008 Posted December 17, 2008 The players have one third of the Pro Bowl vote, and I was wondering if they voted for Peters to give him some more ammunition after the season for his fight for a new contract, the fight he lost this past season? Just a thought, although not as strong as the MLB union, they do stick together. After all if they would actually defend Plaxico Burress or Pacman, why wouldn't they try to get Peters the raise he wants?
keepthefaith Posted December 17, 2008 Posted December 17, 2008 The players have one third of the Pro Bowl vote, and I was wondering if they voted for Peters to give him some more ammunition after the season for his fight for a new contract, the fight he lost this past season? Just a thought, although not as strong as the MLB union, they do stick together. After all if they would actually defend Plaxico Burress or Pacman, why wouldn't they try to get Peters the raise he wants? Absolutely possible.
GhostsOfTheRockpile Posted December 17, 2008 Posted December 17, 2008 The players helped vote Ruben Brown back to the Pro Bowl time after time after time. Reputation is what gets linemen in, so I doubt there's any collusion among the players here. But yes, "ANYTHING" is possible...
nucci Posted December 17, 2008 Posted December 17, 2008 Most players voting don't even know half the players in the league, least of all linemen. They just vote for who made it the previous year.
Tcali Posted December 17, 2008 Posted December 17, 2008 The players have one third of the Pro Bowl vote, and I was wondering if they voted for Peters to give him some more ammunition after the season for his fight for a new contract, the fight he lost this past season? Just a thought, although not as strong as the MLB union, they do stick together. After all if they would actually defend Plaxico Burress or Pacman, why wouldn't they try to get Peters the raise he wants? very good thought---and very likely true...they are a pack of weasels
Recommended Posts