Steely Dan Posted December 9, 2008 Share Posted December 9, 2008 Link Actress Fran Drescher has expressed interest in being appointed to the U.S. Senate seat that New York's Hillary Clinton is giving up to become secretary of state, a spokesman for the actress said. No, seriously. "Fran Drescher, actress, women's health advocate and public diplomacy envoy for the U.S. State Department, announced that she is throwing her hat into the ring of contenders for the senate seat being vacated by Secretary of State-designate Hillary Rodham Clinton," Drescher spokesman Jordan Brown told CNN in a written statement late Monday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fingon Posted December 9, 2008 Share Posted December 9, 2008 WTF? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mead107 Posted December 9, 2008 Share Posted December 9, 2008 I would like to put my name in the running . Senator Mead , has a nice ring to it . I will keep the Bills in Buffalo . Wine for everyone if I get it . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PastaJoe Posted December 9, 2008 Share Posted December 9, 2008 Patterson should take to opportunity to make some money for the state. Celebrity Senator, like The Celebrity Apprentice, could be a tv show where all the contestants go through a series of challenges to see who is best at the job. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steely Dan Posted December 9, 2008 Author Share Posted December 9, 2008 Patterson should take to opportunity to make some money for the state. Celebrity Senator, like The Celebrity Apprentice, could be a tv show where all the contestants go through a series of challenges to see who is best at the job. That's actually not a bad idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blzrul Posted December 9, 2008 Share Posted December 9, 2008 This would be good for Palin 2012. This woman is the ONLY person I can think of with a more annoying voice than Palin. So by 2012, Palin would actually sound GOOD. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted December 9, 2008 Share Posted December 9, 2008 This would be good for Palin 2012. This woman is the ONLY person I can think of with a more annoying voice than Palin. So by 2012, Palin would actually sound GOOD. You put a greased naked woman on all fours with a dog collar around her neck, and a leash, and a man's arm extended out up to here, holding onto the leash, and pushing a black glove in her face to sniff it. You don't find that offensive? You don't find that sexist? You're right, that is annoying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted December 9, 2008 Share Posted December 9, 2008 This would be good for Palin 2012. This woman is the ONLY person I can think of with a more annoying voice than Palin. So by 2012, Palin would actually sound GOOD. You obviously never listened to Sandra Bernhard. It doesn't get more annoying that her. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steely Dan Posted December 9, 2008 Author Share Posted December 9, 2008 This would be good for Palin 2012. This woman is the ONLY person I can think of with a more annoying voice than Palin. So by 2012, Palin would actually sound GOOD. I thought Palin's voice was cute. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boomer860 Posted December 9, 2008 Share Posted December 9, 2008 Link Actress Fran Drescher has expressed interest in being appointed to the U.S. Senate seat that New York's Hillary Clinton is giving up to become secretary of state, a spokesman for the actress said. No, seriously. "Fran Drescher, actress, women's health advocate and public diplomacy envoy for the U.S. State Department, announced that she is throwing her hat into the ring of contenders for the senate seat being vacated by Secretary of State-designate Hillary Rodham Clinton," Drescher spokesman Jordan Brown told CNN in a written statement late Monday. She is better looking than the Kenedy whore Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted December 9, 2008 Share Posted December 9, 2008 You put a greased naked woman on all fours with a dog collar around her neck, and a leash, and a man's arm extended out up to here, holding onto the leash, and pushing a black glove in her face to sniff it. You don't find that offensive? You don't find that sexist? Smell the glove. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted December 9, 2008 Share Posted December 9, 2008 Smell the glove. Sexy? What's wrong with sexy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dean Posted December 9, 2008 Share Posted December 9, 2008 Maybe Lois Griffin should get a shot at the job. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ieatcrayonz Posted December 9, 2008 Share Posted December 9, 2008 Patterson should take to opportunity to make some money The governor dude from Illinois tried that idea just today. Results are not final but don't look too good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blzrul Posted December 9, 2008 Share Posted December 9, 2008 She is better looking than the Kenedy whore Spoken like a true sexist PIG - you have no cause to call this woman a whore. Call her unqualified. Call her elitist. But "whore" goes beyond the boundaries even for this board. You've proven many times that you and intelligence are complete strangers, so I guess I shouldn't be surprised. But if you have a wife, mother, sister, grandmother and a SHRED (miniscule though it may be) of decency you can surely come up with another pea-brained insult toward a woman who has probably done you no harm. I realize you are probably insecure, and you probably have an EXCELLENT reason for it, but perhaps a little less bile might make you ... almost ... palatable. Naw. Here, try this instead: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ieatcrayonz Posted December 9, 2008 Share Posted December 9, 2008 Spoken like a true sexist PIG - you have no cause to call this woman a whore. Call her unqualified. Call her elitist. But "whore" goes beyond the boundaries even for this board. You've proven many times that you and intelligence are complete strangers, so I guess I shouldn't be surprised. But if you have a wife, mother, sister, grandmother and a SHRED (miniscule though it may be) of decency you can surely come up with another pea-brained insult toward a woman who has probably done you no harm. I realize you are probably insecure, and you probably have an EXCELLENT reason for it, but perhaps a little less bile might make you ... almost ... palatable. Naw. Here, try this instead: Dude, although I mostly agree with what you said, please don't call him surely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blzrul Posted December 9, 2008 Share Posted December 9, 2008 Dude, although I mostly agree with what you said, please don't call him surely. It was the only word I could use that the system didn't automatically change to 2#$@$@$ or $#@$ or $@$$. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boomer860 Posted December 9, 2008 Share Posted December 9, 2008 Spoken like a true sexist PIG - you have no cause to call this woman a whore. Call her unqualified. Call her elitist. But "whore" goes beyond the boundaries even for this board. You've proven many times that you and intelligence are complete strangers, so I guess I shouldn't be surprised. But if you have a wife, mother, sister, grandmother and a SHRED (miniscule though it may be) of decency you can surely come up with another pea-brained insult toward a woman who has probably done you no harm. I realize you are probably insecure, and you probably have an EXCELLENT reason for it, but perhaps a little less bile might make you ... almost ... palatable. Naw. Here, try this instead: You are right my apologies. What I should have said is she is an unqualified ,elitist whore. Maybe I know something you dont ,so much for free speech ,but then again spoken like a true libertard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steely Dan Posted December 10, 2008 Author Share Posted December 10, 2008 She is better looking than the Kenedy whore She has nice cans! Spoken like a true sexist PIG - you have no cause to call this woman a whore. Call her unqualified. Call her elitist. But "whore" goes beyond the boundaries even for this board. You've proven many times that you and intelligence are complete strangers, so I guess I shouldn't be surprised. But if you have a wife, mother, sister, grandmother and a SHRED (miniscule though it may be) of decency you can surely come up with another pea-brained insult toward a woman who has probably done you no harm. I realize you are probably insecure, and you probably have an EXCELLENT reason for it, but perhaps a little less bile might make you ... almost ... palatable. Naw. Here, try this instead: You are right my apologies. What I should have said is she is an unqualified ,elitist whore. Maybe I know something you dont ,so much for free speech ,but then again spoken like a true libertard. You're someone I think religion might help. Find one that makes you compassionate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted December 10, 2008 Share Posted December 10, 2008 You obviously never listened to Sandra Bernhard. It doesn't get more annoying that her. Susan Estrich or Elanor Clift Worse than fingernails on a chalkboard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts