Fingon Posted December 9, 2008 Posted December 9, 2008 http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/o...ends-appraisal/ And the hits keep coming....
Bishop Hedd Posted December 9, 2008 Posted December 9, 2008 http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/o...ends-appraisal/ And the hits keep coming.... Oh golly is this the nonsense we will have to look forward to from the far right dingbats for the next few years? Washington Times...Jeezuz H. Christ!
Fingon Posted December 9, 2008 Author Posted December 9, 2008 Oh golly is this the nonsense we will have to look forward to from the far right dingbats for the next few years? Washington Times...Jeezuz H. Christ! Yes, because the Washington Times is totally making up the indictment.
Chef Jim Posted December 9, 2008 Posted December 9, 2008 Yes, because the Washington Times is totally making up the indictment. When you don't like the message............
K-9 Posted December 9, 2008 Posted December 9, 2008 I suggest the current administration immediately appoint a special prosecutor so they can get a head start on the 75 million dollar investigation of Obama's shady deals. You never know. Maybe they can get him to lie about a BJ or something down the road.
stuckincincy Posted December 9, 2008 Posted December 9, 2008 I suggest the current administration immediately appoint a special prosecutor so they can get a head start on the 75 million dollar investigation of Obama's shady deals. You never know. Maybe they can get him to lie about a BJ or something down the road. I suggest that the vast majority of the media refused to do due diligence before the election about a particular candidate, and report. Journalism schooling has coursework on ethics - like medicine and law. Those are the only fields of study that have that or evidently need that, AFAIK. Makes one think, eh? Another betrayal by the press. That's very sad. And ominous for the future.
elegantelliotoffen Posted December 9, 2008 Posted December 9, 2008 In case you didn't notice the "associations card" didn't work all that well on election day. Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. Albert Einstein, (attributed) US (German-born) physicist (1879 - 1955)
blzrul Posted December 9, 2008 Posted December 9, 2008 Reading the documentation, this guy has been under investigation for years for a number of things. Could the fact that this broke NOW be politically motivated? Maybe. But, this guy had it coming and it looks like this is the last straw. Get rid of him now. I still cannot fathom the impudence and arrogance that led them to think they could get away with all this.
Fingon Posted December 9, 2008 Author Posted December 9, 2008 In case you didn't notice the "associations card" didn't work all that well on election day. Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. Albert Einstein, (attributed) US (German-born) physicist (1879 - 1955) I think the fact that the indictment is on the deal that Obama and Rezko made makes this way beyond simple association. I'm not saying this is true, but it warrants an investigation.
Chef Jim Posted December 9, 2008 Posted December 9, 2008 Reading the documentation, this guy has been under investigation for years for a number of things. Could the fact that this broke NOW be politically motivated? Maybe. But, this guy had it coming and it looks like this is the last straw. Get rid of him now. I still cannot fathom the impudence and arrogance that led them to think they could get away with all this. And are you ok that this is the political machine that produced our next president?
IDBillzFan Posted December 9, 2008 Posted December 9, 2008 I think the fact that the indictment is on the deal that Obama and Rezko made makes this way beyond simple association. I'm not saying this is true, but it warrants an investigation. No, I think Obama denounced Rezko, so all is forgiven. No, wait. That wasn't Rezko, it was Ayers. No, wait. That wasn't Ayers, it was Wright. No, wait, it was Rezko. No, wait...
K-9 Posted December 9, 2008 Posted December 9, 2008 I suggest that the vast majority of the media refused to do due diligence before the election about a particular candidate, and report. Journalism schooling has coursework on ethics - like medicine and law. Those are the only fields of study that have that or evidently need that, AFAIK. Makes one think, eh? Another betrayal by the press. That's very sad. And ominous for the future. You're right. If only we'd been informed of all those nefarious associations Obama has had before the election. From Wright to Ayers to Rezko the press just ducked their heads in the sand and didn't utter a peep. I'd have least have thought the opposing campaigns would have made those guys an issue. Why didn't someone from the GOP alert the press to Obama's obvious criminal associations? You'd think they'd at least have brought it up. I agree 100% that the Fourth Estate has lost it's sense of patriotic duty of being a check on the three branches of government. Since deregulation of the industry occurred and less owners control more outlets you can expect more of the same from the media and its chase for the best value in infotainment.
Boomer860 Posted December 9, 2008 Posted December 9, 2008 Libertards dont care about facts they care about the message of hope and change . What a bunch of suckers or sheep or both
K-9 Posted December 9, 2008 Posted December 9, 2008 Libertards dont care about facts they care about the message of hope and change . What a bunch of suckers or sheep or both So what's stopping you from insisting that Obama be investigated? You have that right as a citizen. Have you written your representatives? Contacted the press? Set up a press conference announcing your intentions. Hey, if you have the facts as you say, then it is your responsibility to report all high crimes and misdemeanors. You can file suit on your own, too. Boomer860 vs. Obama. As I said, it's your right and obligation.
Cheeseburger_in_paradise Posted December 9, 2008 Posted December 9, 2008 You're right. If only we'd been informed of all those nefarious associations Obama has had before the election. From Wright to Ayers to Rezko the press just ducked their heads in the sand and didn't utter a peep. I'd have least have thought the opposing campaigns would have made those guys an issue. Why didn't someone from the GOP alert the press to Obama's obvious criminal associations? You'd think they'd at least have brought it up. I agree 100% that the Fourth Estate has lost it's sense of patriotic duty of being a check on the three branches of government. Since deregulation of the industry occurred and less owners control more outlets you can expect more of the same from the media and its chase for the best value in infotainment. Yeah, and they tore Sara Palin apart before they even knew who she was.
/dev/null Posted December 9, 2008 Posted December 9, 2008 Could the fact that this broke NOW be politically motivated? Maybe. If it was politically motivated wouldn't have broken before the election
Cheeseburger_in_paradise Posted December 9, 2008 Posted December 9, 2008 If it was politically motivated wouldn't have broken before the election Before the election, there was no seat for sale. But we still know far less about Obama and his political assosiations than we should know IMHO. In four years, I guess we can vote him out if we want to.
Wacka Posted December 10, 2008 Posted December 10, 2008 When you don't like the message............ Lesson #1 from the Clinton playbook.
DC Tom Posted December 10, 2008 Posted December 10, 2008 http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/o...ends-appraisal/ And the hits keep coming.... Wow. That's an even bigger stretch than Whitewater. At least the Democrats, against Bush, tried straightforward bull sh--. Why do the Republicans have to make their bull sh-- so convoluted?
Recommended Posts