Thailog80 Posted October 27, 2004 Share Posted October 27, 2004 Both scare the Bejesus out of me anyways. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted October 27, 2004 Share Posted October 27, 2004 Both scare the Bejesus out of me anyways. 87956[/snapback] The remote, so I could miss the agony. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cugalabanza Posted October 27, 2004 Share Posted October 27, 2004 I always hated these "would you rather chew your own arm off or french kiss your grandma" type questions. ...so I didn't even vote. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted October 27, 2004 Share Posted October 27, 2004 who would I rather have doing what? ordering the pizza? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevestojan Posted October 27, 2004 Share Posted October 27, 2004 I always hated these "would you rather chew your own arm off or french kiss your grandma" type questions. ...so I didn't even vote. 87961[/snapback] chew off my own arm. I picked Lindell. Drew is honestly done. Like when were inside the 10 last week and he TOOK OFF AS IF HE COULD ACTUALLY RUN!! Even the annoucer said "he had plenty of time to stay in the pockert... maybe 2 or 3 more seconds!!!" AHHHHHHHH! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thailog80 Posted October 27, 2004 Author Share Posted October 27, 2004 who would I rather have doing what? ordering the pizza? 87963[/snapback] If the Bills had one chance to score late...who would you rather see trying to win the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_BiB_ Posted October 27, 2004 Share Posted October 27, 2004 If the Bills had one chance to score late...who would you rather see trying to win the game. 87972[/snapback] Moorman. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevestojan Posted October 27, 2004 Share Posted October 27, 2004 It's sad that I really cannot give you an honest answer to this question. I don't know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted October 27, 2004 Share Posted October 27, 2004 If the Bills had one chance to score late...who would you rather see trying to win the game. 87972[/snapback] yard line? time left on the clock? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thailog80 Posted October 27, 2004 Author Share Posted October 27, 2004 yard line? time left on the clock? 87989[/snapback] 35 with 0:08 on the clock...no TO's Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted October 27, 2004 Share Posted October 27, 2004 35 with 0:08 on the clock...no TO's 87991[/snapback] grass or turf? weather? tailwind or headwind? mph? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thailog80 Posted October 27, 2004 Author Share Posted October 27, 2004 grass or turf? weather? tailwind or headwind? mph? 87995[/snapback] Fug it you ****. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevestojan Posted October 27, 2004 Share Posted October 27, 2004 35 with 0:08 on the clock...no TO's 87991[/snapback] 0:08 on the clock? Well, 52 yards is a long field goal, but i think he could hit 20% of them or more. 8 seconds with this offense would give us NO chance of 2 plays (sadly). And, we cant risk the sack. In this scenario, I kick the low-percentage FG. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Like A Mofo Posted October 27, 2004 Share Posted October 27, 2004 If the Bills had one chance to score late...who would you rather see trying to win the game. 87972[/snapback] Lindell, no questions asked. And thats not a ringing endorsement from me about Lindell either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billsfanone Posted October 27, 2004 Share Posted October 27, 2004 I'd rather punt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted October 27, 2004 Share Posted October 27, 2004 Fug it you ****. 88001[/snapback] well, i can't argue with that! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerball Posted October 27, 2004 Share Posted October 27, 2004 Fug it you ****. 88001[/snapback] In that case it's got to be Lindell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevestojan Posted October 27, 2004 Share Posted October 27, 2004 Lindell - 80% chance of missing the kick. Bledsoe - 90-95% chance of getting sacked (not exaggerating) Yes, I would go with Lindell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcjeff215 Posted October 27, 2004 Share Posted October 27, 2004 Um.... where's the Moorman option? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WILLIS Posted October 27, 2004 Share Posted October 27, 2004 Moorman. 87981[/snapback] first thought that popped into my head also... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts