JÂy RÛßeÒ Posted October 27, 2004 Share Posted October 27, 2004 Willis and Travis will both be named starters for Sunday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rico Posted October 27, 2004 Share Posted October 27, 2004 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuckincincy Posted October 27, 2004 Share Posted October 27, 2004 Willis and Travis will both be named starters for Sunday. 87534[/snapback] Hmm...will they use flags or starter pistols? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark VI Posted October 27, 2004 Share Posted October 27, 2004 Nothing like damage control. Tis the Political season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thailog80 Posted October 27, 2004 Share Posted October 27, 2004 Nothing like damage control. Tis the Political season. 87568[/snapback] Only if he's running for Assclown of WNY. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billsfanone Posted October 27, 2004 Share Posted October 27, 2004 Mr. Rubeo - Is this serious? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JinVA Posted October 27, 2004 Share Posted October 27, 2004 Is this damage control? or does anyone think MM thinks he can improve the O with Willis and Travis in at the same time? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevestojan Posted October 27, 2004 Share Posted October 27, 2004 Is this damage control? or does anyone think MM thinks he can improve the O with Willis and Travis in at the same time? 87581[/snapback] That doesn't really matter. If in 1991 both Thurman and K Davis took the field for the first snap, K Davis knew damn well he wasn't the "starter" ... This is a kitty move by a kitty coach. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thailog80 Posted October 27, 2004 Share Posted October 27, 2004 That doesn't really matter. If in 1991 both Thurman and K Davis took the field for the first snap, K Davis knew damn well he wasn't the "starter" ... This is a kitty move by a kitty coach. 87585[/snapback] I don't think he's a kitty. I think he's trying to keep Travis' yap shut. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richjk21 Posted October 27, 2004 Share Posted October 27, 2004 Just had the same thing pop up on my Bills direct window.... Nothing like sending a perfectly clear mixed message .... you have to wonder if Mularky isn't truely in over his head... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevewin Posted October 27, 2004 Share Posted October 27, 2004 I think this is pretty funny - you define 'starter' by who is on the field for the first play, so start with a formation where they're both in there and they're both the starters. Brilliant!! Wonder if this is a subtle middle finger by Mularkey to the media/fans. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Realist Posted October 27, 2004 Share Posted October 27, 2004 The only way I would agree with this is if they are both in together. If he just means they'll get approximately the same number of carries throughout the game, I don't like that. You need one back to carry the bulk of the load so he can build a rhythm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevestojan Posted October 27, 2004 Share Posted October 27, 2004 I don't think he's a kitty. I think he's trying to keep Travis' yap shut. 87588[/snapback] Kelly, that's how you shut Tarvis's whining? Holy crap - you think this is how Levy would have done it? Dikta? Billicheck? Oh my lord, we are on a sinking ship, and our captain is wasted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JinVA Posted October 27, 2004 Share Posted October 27, 2004 I don't think he's a kitty. I think he's trying to keep Travis' yap shut. 87588[/snapback] Then again if Travis doesn't play I would think his trade value would drop. If indeed they do plan on trading him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted October 27, 2004 Share Posted October 27, 2004 Willis and Travis will both be named starters for Sunday. 87534[/snapback] If that means he's going with a two-back set commitment to the run and deemphasizing the convulsive spasms that masquerade as a passing game, I'm all for it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thailog80 Posted October 27, 2004 Share Posted October 27, 2004 Kelly, that's how you shut Tarvis's whining? Holy crap - you think this is how Levy would have done it? Dikta? Billicheck? Oh my lord, we are on a sinking ship, and our captain is wasted. 87596[/snapback] All those you mentioned had terrible records their first year man..........give the guy a chance. Matter of fact all three of them were fired at one point in their careers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rico Posted October 27, 2004 Share Posted October 27, 2004 If that means he's going with a two-back set commitment to the run and deemphasizing the convulsive spasms that masquerade as a passing game, I'm all for it. 87602[/snapback] Only if Willis is playing the lead role as RB, with TH playing the secondary role as FB. Too bad TH can't block. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JÂy RÛßeÒ Posted October 27, 2004 Author Share Posted October 27, 2004 Mr. Rubeo - Is this serious? 87572[/snapback] As a heart attack... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Garranimal Posted October 27, 2004 Share Posted October 27, 2004 Kelly, that's how you shut Tarvis's whining? Holy crap - you think this is how Levy would have done it? Dikta? Billicheck? Oh my lord, we are on a sinking ship, and our captain is wasted. 87596[/snapback] What the hell has travis actually said. Can you actually post a quote, because the only one that seems to be doing the talking is Willis. Willis in preseason and willis now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DPR4444 Posted October 27, 2004 Share Posted October 27, 2004 Maybe we can start two guys at every position?!? would it improve our chances, or would we just get twice as many stupid penalties? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts