DrDawkinstein Posted December 2, 2008 Posted December 2, 2008 for the last 4 games of the season http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3740122 no Donte...
lets_go_bills Posted December 2, 2008 Posted December 2, 2008 Why does a long snapper need to go on the sauce?
extrahammer Posted December 2, 2008 Posted December 2, 2008 for the last 4 games of the season http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3740122 no Donte... Finaplex disguises better
DrDawkinstein Posted December 2, 2008 Author Posted December 2, 2008 Why does a long snapper need to go on the sauce? there is no evidence that any of them took steroids. its for using a diuretic. which, yes, can be used to mask bad things in your pee but it can also be used by big guys trying to make a weight-clause in their contract...
lets_go_bills Posted December 2, 2008 Posted December 2, 2008 there is no evidence that any of them took steroids. its for using a diuretic. which, yes, can be used to mask bad things in your pee but it can also be used by big guys trying to make a weight-clause in their contract... They all took it to mask the juice they were taking. No evidence, yeah, but please. They're fooling no one.
stuckincincy Posted December 2, 2008 Posted December 2, 2008 for the last 4 games of the season http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3740122 no Donte... Were these the ones that were in the news several weeks ago that were taking an OTC item that didn't list all the ingredients? If so - I guess this another one of Roger the Politically-Correct Dodger's finger-in-the-wind decisions, following the recent Plaxico Burris thing.
DrDawkinstein Posted December 2, 2008 Author Posted December 2, 2008 Were these the ones that were in the news several weeks ago that were taking an OTC item that didn't list all the ingredients? If so - I guess this another one of Roger the Politically-Correct Dodger's finger-in-the-wind decisions, following the recent Plaxico Burris thing. not sure if we're talking about the same past story, but yes, this is the final list of guys that had been rumored for the past month or so. there were even rumors spread here about Whitner being on the list.
DrDawkinstein Posted December 2, 2008 Author Posted December 2, 2008 They all took it to mask the juice they were taking. No evidence, yeah, but please. They're fooling no one. who needs "facts" and "evidence" when we have lets_go_bills?
Hazed and Amuzed Posted December 2, 2008 Posted December 2, 2008 Finaplex disguises better There are longer estered Fina nowadays. Although I'm not so sure that would be beneficial for the fat boys. That's a better roid for lean guys.
Tcali Posted December 2, 2008 Posted December 2, 2008 for the last 4 games of the season http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3740122 no Donte... Pat Williams is 36 years old. I think players should be able to use roids after age 35.
Steely Dan Posted December 2, 2008 Posted December 2, 2008 I'm glad I picked up Oakland's defense because I'm dumping Minnesota they're defense is gonna suck. Look for offenses to get 300 yards rushing per game!
stuckincincy Posted December 2, 2008 Posted December 2, 2008 not sure if we're talking about the same past story, but yes, this is the final list of guys that had been rumored for the past month or so. there were even rumors spread here about Whitner being on the list. I'm not sure either, Dr. We'll have to wait and see what shakes out I guess.
lets_go_bills Posted December 3, 2008 Posted December 3, 2008 who needs "facts" and "evidence" when we have lets_go_bills? LOL, exactly. Seriously though, these weight loss dieuretics don't afford these players that much benefit as a stand alone product, but rather to mask there consumption of steroids. I'm not truly naive enough to just assume they took steroids, but it doesn't look good and the signs point to them having done so, IMO.
Fezmid Posted December 3, 2008 Posted December 3, 2008 I'm glad I picked up Oakland's defense because I'm dumping Minnesota they're defense is gonna suck. Look for offenses to get 300 yards rushing per game! They play Detroit next week.....
The_Philster Posted December 3, 2008 Posted December 3, 2008 They play Detroit next week..... take Detroit in an upset although....Pat Williams' attorney is filing an appeal tomorrow...just came across NFL Total Access about 10 minutes ago
Fezmid Posted December 3, 2008 Posted December 3, 2008 take Detroit in an upset although....Pat Williams' attorney is filing an appeal tomorrow...just came across NFL Total Access about 10 minutes ago I don't think they'll be able to get an injunction or anything. They're part of the NFLPA -- and since they went through the process and the appeal and still lost, I don't think a lawsuit will help. Take your suspension and get ready for the playoffs.
Flbillsfan#1 Posted December 3, 2008 Posted December 3, 2008 Pat Williams is 36 years old. I think players should be able to use roids after age 35. They are as long as they play for the Pats*.
BuffOrange Posted December 3, 2008 Posted December 3, 2008 I'm glad I picked up Oakland's defense because I'm dumping Minnesota they're defense is gonna suck. Look for offenses to get 300 yards rushing per game! Yeah awesome news for those of us Michael Turner owners that have a shot to make it to championship week Sounds like they're going to appeal though which could take forever...
StupidNation Posted December 3, 2008 Posted December 3, 2008 Over 90% of the NFL is on the juice. To get caught means you're a moron.
Recommended Posts