Jump to content

(LAMP) Xmas light picture on the lake


Fezmid

Recommended Posts

I took this photograph over the weekend in Oshkosh, WI. There's a "Festival of Lights" type of thing going on. I think it turned out pretty well and just wanted to share. 0:)

 

http://www.fezam.com/nightlights.jpg

 

I probably should've used a higher ISO (set to 400 -- probably should've tried 800). In addition, I did crop the image and apply an unsharp mask. Could've done better if I had a tripod, but I accidentally left it at home (in Minnesota...), so had to improvise with what I could find in the area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I took this photograph over the weekend in Oshkosh, WI. There's a "Festival of Lights" type of thing going on. I think it turned out pretty well and just wanted to share. :wub:

 

http://www.fezam.com/nightlights.jpg

 

I probably should've used a higher ISO (set to 400 -- probably should've tried 800). In addition, I did crop the image and apply an unsharp mask. Could've done better if I had a tripod, but I accidentally left it at home (in Minnesota...), so had to improvise with what I could find in the area.

 

 

0:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

nice shot! What do you have for glass? And you shoot Canon, don't you? I am impressed you got that shot without a tripod

 

I have the Canon Digital Rebel XTi. For this shot, I was using this 50mm f/1.4 lens:

http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_ss_gw?url=s...amp;x=0&y=0

 

I also have this lens (28-135mm):

http://www.amazon.com/Canon-28-135mm-3-5-5...6898&sr=1-1

 

And this one (70-300 DO - awesome lens but very expensive - I got it about $100 cheaper than listed here):

http://www.amazon.com/Canon-70-300mm-4-5-5...6924&sr=1-1

 

I used a post I found in the parking lot to balance the camera on -- probably could've gotten a better shot if I could've moved wherever I wanted to, but it was relatively flat and I didn't have to hold the camera too much (still had to hold it a little though, so vibrations from my body still affected it I'm sure).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have the Canon Digital Rebel XTi. For this shot, I was using this 50mm f/1.4 lens:

http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_ss_gw?url=s...amp;x=0&y=0

 

I also have this lens (28-135mm):

http://www.amazon.com/Canon-28-135mm-3-5-5...6898&sr=1-1

 

And this one (70-300 DO - awesome lens but very expensive - I got it about $100 cheaper than listed here):

http://www.amazon.com/Canon-70-300mm-4-5-5...6924&sr=1-1

 

I used a post I found in the parking lot to balance the camera on -- probably could've gotten a better shot if I could've moved wherever I wanted to, but it was relatively flat and I didn't have to hold the camera too much (still had to hold it a little though, so vibrations from my body still affected it I'm sure).

 

Dunno...they used to sell things that would tap into a camera tripod base and had straps - sometimes velcro, sometimes canvas strap and a buckle - that would stabilize and hold still a camera for a time exposure. I have one of those in my kit bag.

 

I know zilch about digital cameras...you used to be able to stop down the exposure, fiddle with the ASA, and make exposure modifications during development of the image recorded on the emulsion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dunno...they used to sell things that would tap into a camera tripod base and had straps - sometimes velcro, sometimes canvas strap and a buckle - that would stabilize and hold still a camera for a time exposure. I have one of those in my kit bag.

 

If you find a link to what you're talking about, I'd like to see it. I can't picture what it is or how it works... But if it fits in a camera bag, it might be something to add to my kit!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you find a link to what you're talking about, I'd like to see it. I can't picture what it is or how it works... But if it fits in a camera bag, it might be something to add to my kit!

 

It's called Ultra-Pod (mine is manufactured by Early Winters). A very useful, low-cost item.

 

Here's a source, with a photo of it. The legs fold in or out...very compact.

 

http://www.campmor.com/outdoor/gear/Product___82060

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's called Ultra-Pod (mine is manufactured by Early Winters). A very useful, low-cost item.

 

Here's a source, with a photo of it. The legs fold in or out...very compact.

 

http://www.campmor.com/outdoor/gear/Product___82060

 

 

I've seen this one around, too. It's a little more expensive, but still fairly reasonable. It looks like it is lightweight and folds up:

 

http://www.campmor.com/outdoor/gear/Product___96542

 

There is a less expensive one for compact cams, and a more expensive model for SLR's with big zoom lenses, and such.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've seen this one around, too. It's a little more expensive, but still fairly reasonable. It looks like it is lightweight and folds up:

 

http://www.campmor.com/outdoor/gear/Product___96542

 

There is a less expensive one for compact cams, and a more expensive model for SLR's with big zoom lenses, and such.

 

I know zilch about digital cameras. Do people still use filters? When I dug out that UltraPod, I glanced at mine - perhaps 20 of them.

 

Dumb question: can you photograph in B&W with a digital camera? I was a big user of B&W film...Kodax Tri-X, Plus-X, and Pan-X, hence the large # of filters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really wish people would leave that stuff up after Christmas. Winter is so boring and gray. Would anyone really mind seeing something like that throughout the winter?

 

You'd be surprised... We had a neighbor tell us we should take down a snowman decoration in the rockbed of our house in February. We weren't even turning it on at that time, we just didn't want to be outside taking down decorations in -20F temperatures (-50F windchills). Crazy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know zilch about digital cameras. Do people still use filters? When I dug out that UltraPod, I glanced at mine - perhaps 20 of them.

 

Dumb question: can you photograph in B&W with a digital camera? I was a big user of B&W film...Kodax Tri-X, Plus-X, and Pan-X, hence the large # of filters.

You can still use filters, but I've found it's easier to just apply the filter in Paint Shop Pro (or Photoshop) after the fact. If you're still using film, and know how the filters work, then there's nothing stopping you from using them. I still use them from time to time with my camcorder.

 

And you can shoot B&W with most (all?) digital cameras -- but again, it usually makes more sense to photograph in color and then just remove the color in software. <_<

 

As for mini-tripods -- thanks for the links, Cincy & Dean. Do those really work pretty well? In particular, I've seen the one that Dean linked to -- but I always just assumed it was a crappy gadget that didn't really work well. Am I mistaken?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can still use filters, but I've found it's easier to just apply the filter in Paint Shop Pro (or Photoshop) after the fact. If you're still using film, and know how the filters work, then there's nothing stopping you from using them. I still use them from time to time with my camcorder.

 

And you can shoot B&W with most (all?) digital cameras -- but again, it usually makes more sense to photograph in color and then just remove the color in software. <_<

 

As for mini-tripods -- thanks for the links, Cincy & Dean. Do those really work pretty well? In particular, I've seen the one that Dean linked to -- but I always just assumed it was a crappy gadget that didn't really work well. Am I mistaken?

 

 

I'm not a camera guy, but I have seen people use them and the look like they work, just fine. I suppose it's a nice thing to have in the bag if you don't want to carry the tripod.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...