K-Gun10 Posted November 26, 2008 Posted November 26, 2008 Scott getting linebacker reps By Chris Brown - Posted November 26th, 2008 It’s not the first time that safety Bryan Scott has been getting linebacker reps in practice, but this week the chances of seeing Scott lined up at linebacker might be much more realistic if Keith Ellison’s absence is injury related. Ellison was absent at practice Wednesday, with details expected to be provided later in the afternoon. Teddy Lehman would be the first linebacker off the bench in such a situation, but he suffered a hamstring injury last Sunday and is not practicing. So Scott is the temporary starter replacing Ellison. The trickle down effect will put George Wilson again as the starter at strong safety. Once there is word on Ellison’s situation we will better know the likelihood of Scott being at linebacker for Sunday’s game. Tags: Bryan Scott, George Wilson, Keith Ellison, Teddy Lehman
Hossage Posted November 26, 2008 Posted November 26, 2008 Scott sure can tackle. He likely will be a third down speed type of linebacker. I really like when they use him as an extra safety to cover tight ends. We could also consider letting this guy go as a speed rusher off the edge in the mold of coy wire.
BuffaloBill Posted November 26, 2008 Posted November 26, 2008 This is scary - maybe a response to the type of offense we are going to see as Scott has coverage skills
DaGimp Posted November 26, 2008 Posted November 26, 2008 This confirms my theory that Dick wants to field a team of all DBs. They will soon have the smallest and weakest team in the league. Good work Dick.
BuffaloBill Posted November 26, 2008 Posted November 26, 2008 This confirms my theory that Dick wants to field a team of all DBs. They will soon have the smallest and weakest team in the league. Good work Dick. They could be smaller
justnzane Posted November 26, 2008 Posted November 26, 2008 They could be smaller ... by replacing Stroud with Corto.
marauderswr80 Posted November 26, 2008 Posted November 26, 2008 Just another sign we need to draft a LB with the first pick. As much as I want a DE, I think LB is the way to go now.
SDS Posted November 26, 2008 Posted November 26, 2008 Thanks for the opportunity, but LB might not be the best place for me.
WellDressed Posted November 26, 2008 Posted November 26, 2008 Thanks for the opportunity, but LB might not be the best place for me. Of course, we can't overlook your blazing speed.
silvermike Posted November 27, 2008 Posted November 27, 2008 Teddy who? As far as next year goes, I think the Bills' problems at LB aren't about not having enough standout players - Poz and Mitchell are a solid duo - it's about how awful the depth chart gets so quickly. They're paper thin! We need to bring in some solid veterans who can give us some breathing room.
d_wag Posted November 27, 2008 Posted November 27, 2008 Teddy who? As far as next year goes, I think the Bills' problems at LB aren't about not having enough standout players - Poz and Mitchell are a solid duo - it's about how awful the depth chart gets so quickly. They're paper thin! We need to bring in some solid veterans who can give us some breathing room. i think the depth was fine this year - when you lose one of your starters, your top backup, and a rooke who was being counted on for a big special teams contribution of course your going to appear "paper thin" there.........take 3 players off any unit and it will look thin
SageAgainstTheMachine Posted November 27, 2008 Posted November 27, 2008 This confirms my theory that Dick wants to field a team of all DBs. They will soon have the smallest and weakest team in the league. Good work Dick. So now it's Dick's fault that Ellison and Lehman are injured?
BillsVet Posted November 27, 2008 Posted November 27, 2008 Teddy who? As far as next year goes, I think the Bills' problems at LB aren't about not having enough standout players - Poz and Mitchell are a solid duo - it's about how awful the depth chart gets so quickly. They're paper thin! We need to bring in some solid veterans who can give us some breathing room. Amen. Last year Coy Wire was forced to play LB. This year's safety turned LB is Bryan Scott. You have to wonder who's doing quality control on the roster they put together. Granted there were injuries to DiGiorgio, Buggs, and Bowen, but none of those guys were in a position to be starting OLB's this year. And furthermore, none of them weigh more than 225 pounds. After Posluszny, Crowell, and Mitchell I don't think Buffalo had another spot starter LB on the roster. C2C is a nice accounting term, but it limits the amount which can be spent on depth players. The result since it's been implemented is razor thin depth. At this point, I don't think there's anything on the street free agent market because this is a problem which should have been resolved back in March.
d_wag Posted November 27, 2008 Posted November 27, 2008 Amen. Last year Coy Wire was forced to play LB. This year's safety turned LB is Bryan Scott. You have to wonder who's doing quality control on the roster they put together. Granted there were injuries to DiGiorgio, Buggs, and Bowen, but none of those guys were in a position to be starting OLB's this year. And furthermore, none of them weigh more than 225 pounds. After Posluszny, Crowell, and Mitchell I don't think Buffalo had another spot starter LB on the roster. C2C is a nice accounting term, but it limits the amount which can be spent on depth players. The result since it's been implemented is razor thin depth. At this point, I don't think there's anything on the street free agent market because this is a problem which should have been resolved back in March. i think it has less to do with C2C and more to do with the fact that the bills value having guys who excel at special teams in those backup spots (see corto and costanzo, and stamer and haggan before them)
BillsVet Posted November 27, 2008 Posted November 27, 2008 i think it has less to do with C2C and more to do with the fact that the bills value having guys who excel at special teams in those backup spots (see corto and costanzo, and stamer and haggan before them) Well, if they value a side of the ball which is on the field no more than 10 percent of the time over depth on defense, so be it. Last I checked they're back to playing backup safeties at LB. How many teams do that year in and year out? Stamer and Haggan were both 240 plus anyway.
d_wag Posted November 27, 2008 Posted November 27, 2008 Well, if they value a side of the ball which is on the field no more than 10 percent of the time over depth on defense, so be it. Last I checked they're back to playing backup safeties at LB. How many teams do that year in and year out? Stamer and Haggan were both 240 plus anyway. not saying i agree with the philosophy.......just showing the way they historically handled it the fact of the matter is if they hadn't lost 4 LB's to injury this year (ellison would be a 5th - and he is the reason scott is seeing snaps at LB) no one would be complaining about the depth
TheKing Posted November 27, 2008 Posted November 27, 2008 Scott getting linebacker reps By Chris Brown - Posted November 26th, 2008 It’s not the first time that safety Bryan Scott has been getting linebacker reps in practice, but this week the chances of seeing Scott lined up at linebacker might be much more realistic if Keith Ellison’s absence is injury related. Ellison was absent at practice Wednesday, with details expected to be provided later in the afternoon. Teddy Lehman would be the first linebacker off the bench in such a situation, but he suffered a hamstring injury last Sunday and is not practicing. So Scott is the temporary starter replacing Ellison. The trickle down effect will put George Wilson again as the starter at strong safety. Once there is word on Ellison’s situation we will better know the likelihood of Scott being at linebacker for Sunday’s game. Tags: Bryan Scott, George Wilson, Keith Ellison, Teddy Lehman For future reference, we don't need those tags, it's unneccessary, so don"t bother..
SageAgainstTheMachine Posted November 28, 2008 Posted November 28, 2008 For future reference, we don't need those tags, it's unneccessary, so don"t bother.. Who the hell cares, he just copy/pastes...it doesn't matter.
Thoner7 Posted November 28, 2008 Posted November 28, 2008 Scott is always makeing big plays. He can in no way shape or form to much worse than Ellison. I like it. Depth is the only concern.
Recommended Posts