dave mcbride Posted November 24, 2008 Posted November 24, 2008 I like him, and I didn't want him to leave. I think he's a good player. I therefore felt pretty bad for him, although I realize that every CB has a miserable game every once in a while. But today, my God.
/dev/null Posted November 24, 2008 Posted November 24, 2008 Clements was an above average starting CB He wasn't the shiznit that he thought he was, but I hope he enjoys spending his ill-gotten gains
Steve O Posted November 24, 2008 Posted November 24, 2008 I like him, and I didn't want him to leave. I think he's a good player. I therefore felt pretty bad for him, although I realize that every CB has a miserable game every once in a while. But today, my God. I don't feel bad for anyone who makes his kind of money, he doesn't care I'm out over 100K in my 401K this year
SageAgainstTheMachine Posted November 24, 2008 Posted November 24, 2008 I like him, and I didn't want him to leave. I think he's a good player. I therefore felt pretty bad for him, although I realize that every CB has a miserable game every once in a while. But today, my God. He mostly has bad days in San Fran. Today wasn't an anamoly.
/dev/null Posted November 24, 2008 Posted November 24, 2008 I don't feel bad for anyone who makes his kind of money, he doesn't care I'm out over 100K in my 401K this year If it makes you feel any better, that 100k in your 401k will eventually rebound The 100k Clements spent on Coke and Hookers is long gone
SageAgainstTheMachine Posted November 24, 2008 Posted November 24, 2008 I didn't see the game what happened? He just got burnt by TO and company all day long.
duey Posted November 24, 2008 Posted November 24, 2008 Here's an article about this troubles today... http://www.star-telegram.com/332/story/1055116.html And note it mentions that Nate gets our own #83 next week.
bluv Posted November 24, 2008 Posted November 24, 2008 And note it mentions that Nate gets our own #83 next week. Oh he will play great next week as it seems every weak link a team has disappears againsts us!
Steely Dan Posted November 24, 2008 Posted November 24, 2008 Here's an article about this troubles today... http://www.star-telegram.com/332/story/1055116.html And note it mentions that Nate gets our own #83 next week. Uh-oh, that's not good. He'll be pumped to come back to Buffalo and double pumped to redeem himself.
NavarreFL_Bills_Fan Posted November 24, 2008 Posted November 24, 2008 He just got burnt by TO and company all day long. He's been on the wrong end of highlight reels a lot this yr.
lets_go_bills Posted November 24, 2008 Posted November 24, 2008 Nate was very good. But not great. Still, I was sad to see him go because he was a proven player who we had drafted and groomed. But we all know what's important to him, and that's money, so good work Nate 'cause you got paid. And today you got burned. And your team sucks. Geez, I don't where that's coming form. I think I may harbour some ill feelings towards him.
BUFFALOTONE Posted November 24, 2008 Posted November 24, 2008 If it makes you feel any better, that 100k in your 401k will eventually rebound The 100k Clements spent on Coke and Hookers is long gone But well spent!
BuffOrange Posted November 24, 2008 Posted November 24, 2008 I like him, and I didn't want him to leave. I think he's a good player. I therefore felt pretty bad for him, although I realize that every CB has a miserable game every once in a while. But today, my God. I didn't like him and wasn't terribly sad to see him leave. As for these highlight show guys ripping him for going for the ball instead of the man at the 5 yard line, meh, I think it's worth the risk to go for the strip in that spot...
jarthur31 Posted November 24, 2008 Posted November 24, 2008 I like him, and I didn't want him to leave. I think he's a good player. I therefore felt pretty bad for him, although I realize that every CB has a miserable game every once in a while. But today, my God. He should've went for the tackle not the strip.
Tom Jackson Posted November 24, 2008 Posted November 24, 2008 Mmm hmmm, mmm hmmm....... He should've went for the tackle not the strip.
Thurman#1 Posted November 24, 2008 Posted November 24, 2008 Breaking news: SF is not a good team. And CBs playing one on one coverage depend on getting at least reasonable pressure on the QB.
bizell Posted November 24, 2008 Posted November 24, 2008 it cracks me up that they play a $75 million dollar cornerback in zone so much. mostly because he isnt as good as he thinks he is.
Captain Quint Posted November 24, 2008 Posted November 24, 2008 Mmm hmmm, mmm hmmm....... Welcome to the board, Tom.
/dev/null Posted November 24, 2008 Posted November 24, 2008 Mmm hmmm, mmm hmmm....... Oh hey TJ, I almost didn't recognize you without your face attached to Boomer's backside
Recommended Posts