Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

The guy has earned it. The decision to start Travis up until this point has been the right one, but it's Willis' time. I don't think our won-loss record would be any different had Willis been the starter all along. But he earned the job on Sunday. And this is coming from one of Travis' biggest supporters.

Posted

Thanks Brad the EZC will be over around 8:30 to talk some "Pigskin"! Leave the mic on baby.....the whiner line is going to be live!

Posted
If we win and Willis has a good game, you won't see much of Henry in a Bills uniform again.  He'll be traded after the season.

86468[/snapback]

if he's worth anything in a trade that is. i wouldnt mind keeping him on as a backup, we will need one.

Posted
Thanks Brad the EZC will be over around 8:30 to talk some "Pigskin"!  Leave the mic on baby.....the whiner line is going to be live!

86474[/snapback]

 

 

I'm 100% positive they don't have enough bleeps at WGR for the EZC tailgate.

Posted
i just realized what starting willis means....

 

ITS THE DAWN OF A NEW ERA FOR THE BILLS.

LET THE WILLIS ERA BEGIN!!!!

86493[/snapback]

 

About time we see the light of dawn. This night has lasted far too long.

Posted
I'm 100% positive they don't have enough bleeps at WGR for the EZC tailgate.

86510[/snapback]

 

Last time we walked over there....Bob Gaughnn told his listeners "Looks like that guy has been one of the guys drinking since Thursday" as he pointed to me! ;)

Posted

does anyone truely believe that our problem is who is "running" the ball? come on, you people want Willis to be good soooo bad you are willing to fool yourselves into thinking he's the better back. He's not 100% yet, and he still is iffy on a lot of plays, he gets up limping all the time... I don't really care who starts, I just want them to win... but just because Willis starts doesn't mean the O-Line will show up. we still need both backs and it doesn't matter if we had Walter Payton back there, our O-Line sucks

Posted
does anyone truely believe that our problem is who is "running" the ball?  come on, you people want Willis to be good soooo bad you are willing to fool yourselves into thinking he's the better back.  He's not 100% yet, and he still is iffy on a lot of plays, he gets up limping all the time... I don't really care who starts, I just want them to win... but just because Willis starts doesn't mean the O-Line will show up.  we still need both backs and it doesn't matter if we had Walter Payton back there, our O-Line sucks

86529[/snapback]

 

If he's not 100 percent I'd like to see him at 100 percent considering how badly he has outplayed dump truck Henry.

Posted
does anyone truely believe that our problem is who is "running" the ball?  come on, you people want Willis to be good soooo bad you are willing to fool yourselves into thinking he's the better back.  He's not 100% yet, and he still is iffy on a lot of plays, he gets up limping all the time... I don't really care who starts, I just want them to win... but just because Willis starts doesn't mean the O-Line will show up.  we still need both backs and it doesn't matter if we had Walter Payton back there, our O-Line sucks

86529[/snapback]

if it was possible to wager a bet with you over this, i would. i'd bet you that putting in willis will solve a lot (granted not all) of our offensive problems.

Posted

here are the stats from sunday's game... looks pretty similar to me

 

 

att. yrds avg. long TD

Willis McGahee 16 58 3.6 15 0

Travis Henry 7 27 3.9 19 0

×
×
  • Create New...