Flbillsfan#1 Posted November 21, 2008 Posted November 21, 2008 I meant overall winning record. This is 2008. Overall this team has much more talent than the 2006 team JP started for, & the Bills have an easier schedule than 2006. As I said JP would have OUTPLAYED Trent THIS YEAR if he were given the chance.
Sisyphean Bills Posted November 21, 2008 Posted November 21, 2008 I guess INT's and TD's are more important then wins to you. That's fine you can have the stats, I'll take the wins.So when you ask me "What has Trent done"(to make ME think he can pull off a winning record)? My answer is this: HE HAS A WINNING RECORD! That's what I think about him pulling off a winning record. Now tell me more about Trent's sh!tty stats. The wins are not simply due to Trent and only Trent. He flat out sucked on Monday and yet the rest of the team nearly bailed his rancid performance out of the ditch. If Rian hits a long kick at the end of the game, the Bills team could've won a game against a bad opponent and in spite of a horribly inept effort by Trent.
Hazed and Amuzed Posted November 21, 2008 Author Posted November 21, 2008 The wins are not simply due to Trent and only Trent. He flat out sucked on Monday and yet the rest of the team nearly bailed his rancid performance out of the ditch. If Rian hits a long kick at the end of the game, the Bills team could've won a game against a bad opponent and in spite of a horribly inept effort by Trent. But the loses do? I didn't start this thread for a Trent, JP debate. That's a ridiculous argument and like your surname a never-ending battle.
Sisyphean Bills Posted November 21, 2008 Posted November 21, 2008 But the loses do? I didn't start this thread for a Trent, JP debate. That's a ridiculous argument and like your surname a never-ending battle. The standard "debate" (being highly charitable) is that "JP just loses" and "Trent just wins". It isn't a real debate because no other evidence is allowed and no other arguments are acknowledged. Of course, the original premises, "JP just loses" and "Trent just wins", are factually incorrect and the whole house of cards collapses under its own staggering stupidity.
Hazed and Amuzed Posted November 21, 2008 Author Posted November 21, 2008 The standard "debate" (being highly charitable) is that "JP just loses" and "Trent just wins". It isn't a real debate because no other evidence is allowed and no other arguments are acknowledged. Of course, the original premises, "JP just loses" and "Trent just wins", are factually incorrect and the whole house of cards collapses under its own staggering stupidity. Still not what the thread is about. This thread is about stability in the Bills organization and putting JP in, like him or not will not help the future of this team. We need to learn from past mistakes not repeat them.
Sisyphean Bills Posted November 21, 2008 Posted November 21, 2008 Instead of pretending you weren't engaged in a JP vs. Trent debate, why don't you just focus on whatever it is you do want to say? Trent is the starter and Jauron is going to ride him regardless.
Recommended Posts