Jump to content

Dear President-Elect Barack H. Obama


Recommended Posts

So, Numb-nuts, are you suggesting I should have worded my statement like this?

 

"I suspect a knee-jerk right wing wacko, like Wacka , will say the pudding is foul, before it is made." :w00t:

 

Your are correct, I don't spend much time here, as listening to morons discuss issues beyond their IQ* is rather troublesome. Plus the insulting tone, these douchebags use, is off-putting. 0:)

 

So, since you claim to be an independent thinker, and not a knee-jerk conservative, I will look forward to you making some zingers (on the main Wall and OTW) that are directed at a conservative, or a republican, in the future.

 

* Note that the use of IQ here is simply for demonstration/rhetorical purposes. I do not believe IQ is a good measurement of intelligence.

 

My disdain for socialistic liberals is far more than it is for large mouth republican wack jobs who promise something they cant deliver either. ( Bush never saw a bill he wouldn't sign like most liberals)

 

You. On the other hand, have shown your hand. Your constant whining about policy is well documented. Maybe you should take another 6 weeks off and read old posts so you don't accuse someone of something they're not(name calling spot).

 

Keep spewing your knee jerk reaction shiit as I have a history here and so do you. Me, where as you don't ,and cannot have, an independent thought without you drinking your kool aid. I don't follow the lemming Dean0, you do.

 

From reading your posts, were the same age. The differences are wide. The biggest is I dont believe everthing I hear. Apparently you do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

My disdain for socialistic liberals is far more than it is for large mouth republican wack jobs who promise something they cant deliver either. ( Bush never saw a bill he wouldn't sign like most liberals)

 

You. On the other hand, have shown your hand. Your constant whining about policy is well documented. Maybe you should take another 6 weeks off and read old posts so you don't accuse someone of something they're not(name calling spot).

 

Keep spewing your knee jerk reaction shiit as I have a history here and so do you. Me, where as you don't ,and cannot have, an independent thought without you drinking your kool aid. I don't follow the lemming Dean0, you do.

 

From reading your posts, were the same age. The differences are wide. The biggest is I dont believe everthing I hear. Apparently you do.

 

 

or...

 

Perhaps I still have some speck of hope alive in my body? I don't go near the cool-aid, and have a good laugh at those on both sides, who do. I regularly bait the knee-jerk liberals who don't seem to understand (or want to understand) exactly how the sausage gets made, or want to realize that their leaders are often as corrupt and offensive as those on the right.

 

That you would call me a "socialistic liberal" shows the depth of your ignorance, when it comes to understanding what I believe in. I am fairly certain that no pure economic system ever works effectively, on a large scale, or for long. The idea of the free market taking care of itself with no regulation is an absolutely stupid concept in the modern world. That everyone should be able see. What we have, in the USA, is a glorious witches brew of capitalistic and socialistic elements (like virtually all other modern Western countries). It's best to simply accept that, and decide to what extent each element does to the system as a whole. Labeling those who look to make some tweaks to save a system in trouble, as "socialists" is a good way to ask to be ignored. But, if you must label, I guess being called a socialist is better than being seen as a modern Marie Antoinette.

 

I prefer to actually try to examine the various realities that people experience, and discuss what works and what doesn't, and talk about ways to change what's wrong in a realistic (but, fair) manner. There are good ideas in failed strategies. Things often succeed due for the wrong reason. There are many similarities in things that are, in the surface, quite different. And, there are numerous differences in things that seem extremely similar. Your approach seems to be mostly negative and cynical. I have yet to see you talk fairly about something with which you disagree, and that is a huge problem, when it comes to understanding things you don't like.

 

It is a good thing to be skeptical, to keep your mind open and to be aware of the pitfalls that exist on all paths. It is a horrible thing to be cynical, negative and have such a closed mind that you "know" your reality is the only reality that matters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

or...

 

Perhaps I still have some speck of hope alive in my body? I don't go near the cool-aid, and have a good laugh at those on both sides, who do. I regularly bait the knee-jerk liberals who don't seem to understand (or want to understand) exactly how the sausage gets made, or want to realize that their leaders are often as corrupt and offensive as those on the right.

 

That you would call me a "socialistic liberal" shows the depth of your ignorance, when it comes to understanding what I believe in. I am fairly certain that no pure economic system ever works effectively, on a large scale, or for long. The idea of the free market taking care of itself with no regulation is an absolutely stupid concept in the modern world. That everyone should be able see. What we have, in the USA, is a glorious witches brew of capitalistic and socialistic elements (like virtually all other modern Western countries). It's best to simply accept that, and decide to what extent each element does to the system as a whole. Labeling those who look to make some tweaks to save a system in trouble, as "socialists" is a good way to ask to be ignored. But, if you must label, I guess being called a socialist is better than being seen as a modern Marie Antoinette.

 

I prefer to actually try to examine the various realities that people experience, and discuss what works and what doesn't, and talk about ways to change what's wrong in a realistic (but, fair) manner. There are good ideas in failed strategies. Things often succeed due for the wrong reason. There are many similarities in things that are, in the surface, quite different. And, there are numerous differences in things that seem extremely similar. Your approach seems to be mostly negative and cynical. I have yet to see you talk fairly about something with which you disagree, and that is a huge problem, when it comes to understanding things you don't like.

 

It is a good thing to be skeptical, to keep your mind open and to be aware of the pitfalls that exist on all paths. It is a horrible thing to be cynical, negative and have such a closed mind that you "know" your reality is the only reality that matters.

 

OK. I've held back at calling you names, now I cant. Tell me my libitard Kool aid drinkin wanker genius, where did I call you a socialistic liberal? Did I say YOU personally? Read much. Maybe you should go to bed, cause right now you're looking like a complete ass.

 

Oh, and take your violins with you. :w00t:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK. I've held back at calling you names, now I cant. Tell me my libitard Kool aid drinkin wanker genius, where did I call you a socialistic liberal? Did I say YOU personally? Read much. Maybe you should go to bed, cause right now you're looking like a complete ass.

 

Oh, and take your violins with you. :w00t:

 

 

And, again, you post is ALL negativity and NO content.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The content was in my first post you responded to. Go to bed old man.

 

 

I guess, for you, that was content. :w00t: Way to crank out the analysis!

 

I burp more interesting stuff than you post, and I just flushed what for you, would be a masterpiece.

 

And "old man"? Me? I'm still young and idealistic!

 

Better now?

 

Time for a cognac and a cigar on the veranda.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess, for you, that was content. :w00t: Way to crank out the analysis!

 

I burp more interesting stuff than you post, and I just flushed what for you, would be a masterpiece.

 

And "old man"? Me? I'm still young and idealistic!

 

Better now?

 

Time for a cognac and a cigar on the veranda.

 

 

Hell, you cant even remember your last post, so you remembering anything of whats been discussed over the last 6 months here is way way way above your stupidity. Calling me a right wing wacko kinda lost any credibility you might of had and you didnt have much. But keep trying old man, you may still get those free checks with Peggy sooner than you think. 0:):lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess, for you, that was content. :w00t: Way to crank out the analysis!

 

I burp more interesting stuff than you post, and I just flushed what for you, would be a masterpiece.

 

And "old man"? Me? I'm still young and idealistic!

 

Better now?

 

Time for a cognac and a cigar on the veranda.

 

 

In addition, since you completely forgot, here is my post to you, old man. Plenty of content. A beginning, a middle and an end.

 

 

And yet thats what he ran on. But those with half a brain knew he was full of shiit. The lemming will be disappointed when they dont get their free shiit.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In addition, since you completely forgot, here is my post to you, old man. Plenty of content. A beginning, a middle and an end.

 

 

And yet thats what he ran on. But those with half a brain knew he was full of shiit. The lemming will be disappointed when they dont get their free shiit.

 

 

 

 

The response indicated that you either didn't bother to, or couldn't, add anything intelligent to the conversation. As I stated, he has stated he wants to make change, and likely will. The extent of the change, is in question. He never promised a revolution. If you have something more complex than your flippant negativity, I have yet to see it.

 

Seriously, if that's what passes as content on PPP, there is little reason to put up with the uncivilized atmosphere.

 

As for mistaking you for right wing wacko (which you deny) given your comments on OTW and the main board, that is a pretty easy assumption to make. Even you admit you like taking shots at "socialistic liberals" (whatever you may think that means). When your pot shots are even handed, I will take my conclusion under advisement. As you know, I don't spend a lot of time on PPP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The response indicated that you either didn't bother to, or couldn't, add anything intelligent to the conversation.

 

Stated my opinion, that will eventually become fact.

 

As I stated, he has stated he wants to make change, and likely will. The extent of the change, is in question. He never promised a revolution. If you have something more complex than your flippant negativity, I have yet to see it.

 

His camp is already trying to bring down expectations. Geeze, I wonder why? Because he lied to his flock to get elected.

 

Seriously, if that's what passes as content on PPP, there is little reason to put up with the uncivilized atmosphere.

This coming from you is freakin hilarious.

 

As for mistaking you for right wing wacko given your comments on OTW and the main board, that is a pretty easy assumption to make.

 

Well there you go with the assumption. By your own admittance you dont come here that often, because if you did you'd know therefore would not make an ass out your self, again.

 

 

Even you admit you like taking shots at "socialistic liberals".

 

Yes I do. Especially when they admit it here that they are. Catch up, Christ!! :thumbsup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stated my opinion, that will eventually become fact.

 

 

 

His camp is already trying to bring down expectations. Geeze, I wonder why? Because he lied to his flock to get elected.

 

 

This coming from you is freakin hilarious.

 

 

 

Well there you go with the assumption. By your own admittance you dont come here that often, because if you did you'd know therefore would not make an ass out your self, again.

 

 

 

 

Yes I do. Especially when they admit it here that they are. Catch up, Christ!! :thumbsup:

 

Breaking up your posts with pieces of my post does make your post look better, you still refuse to add any content to make your part interesting, though.

 

I suppose you will continue to say that you still didn't actually call me a "socialistic liberal". This exchange reveals so much about you, actually. You refuse to have an honest discussion or offer anything useful in the way of analysis or opinion, when it comes to the issue at hand. You simply take negative pot shots, but don't define what you mean by change. That leaves you in a position to claim you "were right", no matter what happens, as some things won't be changed.

 

That's a good strategy, for a gutless "intellectual pu$$y".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suppose you will continue to say that you still didn't actually call me a "socialistic liberal".

 

 

 

:thumbsup: You still cant read, can you? Nowhere did I personally call you a socialistic liberal, though maybe I should have because it sure gets your panties in a wad.

 

I had thought more of you Dean, but just like the rest of Obama's flock of kool aid drinkers, my expectations of you have to be lowered too, dramatically.

 

Thanks for being interesting. :beer:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

:thumbsup: You still cant read, can you? Nowhere did I personally call you a socialistic liberal, though maybe I should have because it sure gets your panties in a wad.

 

I had thought more of you Dean, but just like the rest of Obama's flock of kool aid drinkers, my expectations of you have to be lowered too, dramatically.

 

Thanks for being interesting. :beer:

 

 

I didn't say (this last time) that you called me a "socialistic liberal", that was my point.

 

Yes, I am interesting, and for that you are welcome. I wish your posts were more interesting and revealing about what you believe. Saying "kool aid" in every post isn't a substitution for content. Once again, you fail at adding anything of worth to the actual discussion of the issue of change. Now, I will just assume you don't know enough to discuss it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't say (this last time) that you called me a "socialistic liberal", that was my point.

 

Yes, I am interesting, and for that you are welcome. I wish your posts were more interesting and revealing about what you believe. Saying "kool aid" in every post isn't a substitution for content. Once again, you fail at adding anything of worth to the actual discussion of the issue of change. Now, I will just assume you don't know enough to discuss it.

 

Not only are you interesting but you're funny, too. See I've been here for the whole election. You havent, unless you showed up under an alias name. That wouldn't surprise me if you did that you know why? Because pusssies do that. Now you decide to show up over here and become the self appointed Governor Of Poster Content. Yeah, you have a long long history on the PPP, they should just give you that title. Thats !@#$ing hilarious!! :thumbsup:

 

Making shiit up should be on your business card.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not only are you interesting but you're funny, too. See I've been here for the whole election. You havent, unless you showed up under an alias name. That wouldn't surprise me if you did that you know why? Because pusssies do that. Now you decide to show up over here and become the self appointed Governor Of Poster Content. Yeah, you have a long long history on the PPP, they should just give you that title. Thats !@#$ing hilarious!! :lol:

 

Making shiit up should be on your business card.

 

 

Once again, content free. Good work, Oneonta. :lol:

 

:lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, Numb-nuts, are you suggesting I should have worded my statement like this?

 

"I suspect a knee-jerk right wing wacko, like Wacka , will say the pudding is foul, before it is made." :wallbash:

 

Your are correct, I don't spend much time here, as listening to morons discuss issues beyond their IQ* is rather troublesome. Plus the insulting tone, these douchebags use, is off-putting. :lol:

 

So, since you claim to be an independent thinker, and not a knee-jerk conservative, I will look forward to you making some zingers (on the main Wall and OTW) that are directed at a conservative, or a republican, in the future.

 

* Note that the use of IQ here is simply for demonstration/rhetorical purposes. I do not believe IQ is a good measurement of intelligence.

 

 

Boy, I've enjoyed watching Dean and erynthered go at it for the last 20 posts or so. :lol:

 

All above said, Nader is still a hypocritical trust fund baby, treating his employees like shiip. He doesn't know squat about the environment, but had the audacity to accuse Gore of not being an environmentalist. Common cause produces some great statistics, but Nader is an ego maniacal has been, never was -- going the way of Jesse Jackson, so there!

 

This is your best post yet. You're dead-bang right on Ralph Nader, whom I believe is a miserable human being.

 

People who supported Gore in 2000 should rightfully blame Nader for stealing that election...not Bush.

 

Nader's basic problem is that he's been coasting off "Unsafe at Any Speed" for the last 45 years. BTW, my Dad owned 2 Corvairs in the 60s and never had any problems with them. Dad told me he read Nader's book and thought he was a boldfaced liar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Boy, I've enjoyed watching Dean and erynthered go at it for the last 20 posts or so. :wallbash:

 

I try to do my best, for your enjoyment. :lol:

 

 

This is your best post yet. You're dead-bang right on Ralph Nader, whom I believe is a miserable human being.

 

People who supported Gore in 2000 should rightfully blame Nader for stealing that election...not Bush.

 

 

Well, I don't think Nader is the only person to blame, but yes, he cost Gore that year. But, what does he care? To him Gore and Bush are the same guy because...well...because they aren't Ralph Nader.

 

And, like you I don't really Blame W for the problems with the outcome of election. Jeb Bush maybe, but not W.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Boy, I've enjoyed watching Dean and erynthered go at it for the last 20 posts or so. :wallbash:
.

 

I said in my first post with the Governor of Post content, That I'm cranky when it comes to a Bills loss. :lol:

 

Though, having said that he continued to make an ass out of himself. I'm glad you enjoyed the posts.

 

Saying " I do my best" with regard to enjoyment says it all. No content from the Governor of Content"

 

Vote for me next election for " Governor of Content" !!

 

My election promise is this. I will delete and ban idiot posters like " The Dean" of the promise of content filled threads. How dare he do that while he takes his sabbaticals. constantly taking leaves of 3, 4 5, 6 months at a time from his job. How can you count on a wanna be Content Governor?? And who is he to rule what a content filled post should be. I've seen his posts, I know his posts. He doesnt know posts.

 

Please on December 1st vote for me as Governor of Post content. Thank you for you support

 

 

I, erynthered approved this message

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...