\GoBillsInDallas/ Posted November 6, 2008 Share Posted November 6, 2008 Coincidence? You be the judge: http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dw....17e1be7af.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steely Dan Posted November 6, 2008 Share Posted November 6, 2008 Coincidence? You be the judge: http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dw....17e1be7af.html The only problem with your theory is it's Dallas and I think he'd knock over the VS at the Galleria. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bullpen Posted November 6, 2008 Share Posted November 6, 2008 That's our craaaaaaazy Mr. Beerball! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HopsGuy Posted November 6, 2008 Share Posted November 6, 2008 The are so many questions: (1) Were they all the same size? (2) If so, were they the size of the accomplice? (3) What's the deal with 130 pairs? Why not 140 since that would be exactly 20 weeks' worth. I think I'd be more okay if this didn't seem so well planned out. They should have just said the dude needed to feed a meth addiction and freaked out. Instead it becomes another GBID thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mead107 Posted November 6, 2008 Share Posted November 6, 2008 All the same color ? pink ? Black ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mead107 Posted November 6, 2008 Share Posted November 6, 2008 last year ? http://www.nowpublic.com/life/man-steals-1...omens-underwear Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted November 7, 2008 Share Posted November 7, 2008 The only problem with your theory is it's Dallas and I think he'd knock over the VS at the Galleria. There's another problem with his theory. The article stated there was a female accomplice. This is a problem for 2 reasons 1 - Beerball wouldn't want to share 2 - The panties are worth less than Beerball's female "accomplice" charges per hour Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steely Dan Posted November 7, 2008 Share Posted November 7, 2008 There's another problem with his theory. The article stated there was a female accomplice. This is a problem for 2 reasons 1 - Beerball wouldn't want to share 2 - The panties are worth less than Beerball's female "accomplice" charges per hour Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steely Dan Posted November 7, 2008 Share Posted November 7, 2008 Link Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerball Posted November 7, 2008 Share Posted November 7, 2008 yeah, we'll see who's laughing last. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steely Dan Posted November 7, 2008 Share Posted November 7, 2008 yeah, we'll see who's laughing last. Trust me I'll have an everlasting laugh! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts