crazyDingo Posted November 5, 2008 Posted November 5, 2008 We hire a head coach. The next season we fire either the offensive or defensive coordinator. The season after that, we fire the other guy. Our crappy O-coordinator from last year would've been our scapegoat last season, but he quit. That means at the end of this year we fire Fewell. Next season, we fire Turk. The season after that Jauron refuses to fire either Bobby April or some assorted coordinators, then HE gets fired. I know his contract extension has caused a little confusion about how we will go about rotating our firings, but everything is on schedule. Try to be patient with the rebuilding process. These days everybody wants something within the first 10 years. You are spoiled.
bowery4 Posted November 6, 2008 Posted November 6, 2008 Fairchild wasn't going to get fired. Maybe they should fire Fewell but the most important point here is: You're not Crayonz, stop trying to play him on TBD. At least some of his posts are witty.
santoro770 Posted November 6, 2008 Posted November 6, 2008 Fairchild wasn't going to get fired. Fairchild would have absolutely gotten fired.
keepthefaith Posted November 6, 2008 Posted November 6, 2008 Fairchild would have absolutely gotten fired. I don't know. Jauron in the past has been loyal to a fault with his assistants. People want to jump on Fewell, but remember that he carries out the game plan that is blessed by the head coach.
LabattBlue Posted November 6, 2008 Posted November 6, 2008 People want to jump on Fewell, but remember that he carries out the game plan that is blessed by the head coach. You are assuming this. It is also quite possible that Jauron gives the OC & DC carte blanche to game plan however they choose to.
Cynical Posted November 6, 2008 Posted November 6, 2008 You are assuming this. It is also quite possible that Jauron gives the OC & DC carte blanche to game plan however they choose to. This is irrelevant. Failure to get involved is the same as Jauron saying he agrees with whatever game plan is presented, and he agrees with the final outcome, good or bad. So if the results continue to be bad, Jauron is essentially saying there is nothing wrong.
marauderswr80 Posted November 6, 2008 Posted November 6, 2008 I like Turk as the OC, I like his game calling. I just wish his players would perform better. Especially his OL......
Sisyphean Bills Posted November 6, 2008 Posted November 6, 2008 This is irrelevant. Failure to get involved is the same as Jauron saying he agrees with whatever game plan is presented, and he agrees with the final outcome, good or bad. So if the results continue to be bad, Jauron is essentially saying there is nothing wrong. Not to mention that it isn't the way the NFL works. Yes, the head coach does a lot of administrivia, but there aren't enough players for the offense to go off and do its own thing and the defense to go off and do its own thing and the HC is busy in his office with the secretary not having a clue as to what either is doing. (Last I heard Jauron does actually attend practices and meetings.)
Recommended Posts