elegantelliotoffen Posted October 23, 2008 Posted October 23, 2008 I havent heard of any physical violence against Obama supporters. No?
Kelly the Dog Posted October 23, 2008 Posted October 23, 2008 That's a joke, right? Right? Please? No. Here is the transcript. KRAUTHAMMER: But this had a pedigree. It didn't just start. In the '80's, you had the Margaret Thatcher and Jeane Kirkpatrick who were considered because they were not liberal, they were conservative. They were actually — it was said of them as has been said of Sarah Palin, they were not women because you couldn't be. If you were a conservative. You were, by definition, a patriarchal thug. And if you happened to be a woman, it was simply in women's threads. EASTON: That is not true. There is a lot of respect for Jean Kirkpatrick. There was. There was a lot of respect for her. KRAUTHAMMER: The viciousness with which she was attacked as a contradiction in terms, a conservative woman. In Palin's case, I think what adds to it is her decision at her age with four other children to have a down syndrome child. This, too, as Joseph Epstein wrote, in feminist circles if abortion is not about this, what's it about? And they look at her as sort of a back room — a backwater hick, who, for religious reasons, went ahead and had a child that they would never have. Underneath it, I think, deep underneath it, I think it's a self-loathing on the part of these feminists, knowing that what she did is virtuous and a generous act that they would have never have undertaken. And her having undertaken it is an affront to them, a silent rebuke.
Boomer860 Posted October 23, 2008 Posted October 23, 2008 No? Actually I was talking about the two campaigns specifically. I was in fact aware of this.
In-A-Gadda-Levitre Posted October 23, 2008 Posted October 23, 2008 I havent heard of any physical violence against Obama supporters. and this
Boomer860 Posted October 23, 2008 Posted October 23, 2008 and this There is only one reason for either supporters going to the others rally ,to start trouble. In this case the reporter was caught in the middle as he stated.
In-A-Gadda-Levitre Posted October 23, 2008 Posted October 23, 2008 There is only one reason for either supporters going to the others rally ,to start trouble. In this case the reporter was caught in the middle as he stated. lol, you're funny so then, using your circular logic, why didn't the troublemakers get kicked?
Boomer860 Posted October 23, 2008 Posted October 23, 2008 lol, you're funny so then, using your circular logic, why didn't the troublemakers get kicked? Do you know for a fact that they didnt? Keep in mind the reporter was on the ground at the time. You know what they say ,he had it coming.
SD Jarhead Posted October 23, 2008 Posted October 23, 2008 Many will not get this... So this is for you Seconded. But you better drink it quick before the goon squad runs you out of town for telling the truth.
SD Jarhead Posted October 23, 2008 Posted October 23, 2008 Now back to our regularly scheduled programming. You guys are losing it but good to see the friendly banter Exactly who's losing it?
In-A-Gadda-Levitre Posted October 23, 2008 Posted October 23, 2008 Do you know for a fact that they didnt? Keep in mind the reporter was on the ground at the time. You know what they say ,he had it coming. Joe the Troll
SD Jarhead Posted October 23, 2008 Posted October 23, 2008 Gotta love those tolerant, peace loving Leftists! http://www.local6.com/politics/17784129/detail.html
elegantelliotoffen Posted October 24, 2008 Posted October 24, 2008 Gotta love those tolerant, peace loving Leftists! http://www.local6.com/politics/17784129/detail.html At least "leftists" only shoot inanimate objects. http://www.knoxnews.com/news/2008/jul/29/s...-church-attack/ http://www.cnn.com/2008/CRIME/08/13/arkans...ting/index.html
The Big Cat Posted October 24, 2008 Posted October 24, 2008 There is only one reason for either supporters going to the others rally ,to start trouble. In this case the reporter was caught in the middle as he stated. Buddy! It's comma, THEN space.
YellowLinesandArmadillos Posted October 24, 2008 Posted October 24, 2008 It's a Hoax, the B is backwards on here face and according to MSNBC, the woman had inconsistencies on her polygraph, she said she didnt' give up any money, then she said she did, she said she was unconscious and then wasn't and there are some questions from the bank video. It is a hoax.... Sick, Sick, Sick.
Johnny Coli Posted October 24, 2008 Posted October 24, 2008 It's a Hoax, the B is backwards on here face and according to MSNBC, the woman had inconsistencies on her polygraph, she said she didnt' give up any money, then she said she did, she said she was unconscious and then wasn't and there are some questions from the bank video. It is a hoax.... Sick, Sick, Sick. The mirror-image "B" is a bit bizarre.
YellowLinesandArmadillos Posted October 24, 2008 Posted October 24, 2008 Why would you polygraph a victim? Because of inconsistencies in her statements, the bank photos also... the Police Woman interviewed was a little vague other than they suspected that she was not telling the truth and asked her to voluntarily do one, which apparently she agreed to??? And then more stuff came out!
swede316 Posted October 24, 2008 Posted October 24, 2008 Having taken a few polygraphs myself (for my job) one of the first questions they ask you is if you have any medical issues. An assault victim would have medical issues. Plus I don't trust polygraphs...It's more of an interview process than a machine determined outcome.
Hazed and Amuzed Posted October 24, 2008 Posted October 24, 2008 Having taken a few polygraphs myself (for my job) one of the first questions they ask you is if you have any medical issues. An assault victim would have medical issues. Plus I don't trust polygraphs...It's more of an interview process than a machine determined outcome. Yeah I had to take a couple when I went for my TS Clearance. I went through the voice and regular process, it's nerve racking and that can cause false positives.
YellowLinesandArmadillos Posted October 24, 2008 Posted October 24, 2008 I think they did it because of other evidence... Seriously, she must be some sickee to think this kind of thing won't get figured out and exposed....
Recommended Posts