Jump to content

"Diversity" Is Costing Us Dearly!


Recommended Posts

"Diversity" Is Costing Us Dearly!

 

"Diversity" is arguably the most popular "feel-good" word in American popular culture. It conjures up images of a society where everyone is welcome and nobody dominates.

 

Of course, those seeking to promote diversity never express a need to admit more whites or even Hispanics to "historically black colleges," nor to increase black or Indian homeownership in New York's Chinatown. "Diversity," far from meaning "let's all get together," really means, "let's displace whites." And racially unconscious whites don't care about—in fact, they even "celebrate"—their own decline.

 

But according to a new study undertaken by Dr. Edwin S. Rubinstein, the negative effects of diversity programs are not limited to the whites who are displaced by them. They are harming the economy as a whole—to the tune of trillions of dollars.

 

Today's neo-"conservatives," whose only remaining connection to traditional conservatism is a concern for free enterprise and economic prosperity, routinely join liberals in the clamor for more diversity. They would do well to read Dr. Rubinstein's study, which proves that the damages caused by diversity can be measured in the only terms neocons understand: dollars and cents. Lots of dollars and cents.

 

http://www.nationalpolicyinstitute.org/pdf...ofdiversity.pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah sounds like we need to bring back SEGREGATION!!!! GET ER DONE!!!

 

 

:rolleyes:

 

I read the study and I experienced first hand how organizations, take colleges for example, pushed the buzz word Diversity to the extreme. But come on, you are sounding really naive and racist in this post.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Remember this?

 

The Bell Curve is a controversial, best-selling 1994 book by the late Harvard psychologist Richard J. Herrnstein and American Enterprise Institute political scientist Charles Murray. Its central point is that intelligence is a better predictor of many factors including financial income, job performance, unwed pregnancy, and crime than parents' socioeconomic status or education level. Also, the book argued that those with high intelligence, which it called the "cognitive elite", are becoming separated from the general population of those with average and below-average intelligence and that this was a dangerous social trend. Much of the controversy concerned Chapters 13 and 14, in which the authors wrote about the enduring racial differences in intelligence and discuss implications of those differences. The authors were reported throughout the popular press as arguing that these IQ differences are genetic, and they did indeed write in chapter 13 "It seems highly likely to us that both genes and the environment have something to with racial differences." The introduction to the chapter more cautiously states, "The debate about whether and how much genes and environment have to do with ethnic differences remains unresolved."

The book draws heavily from mainstream science research. However, their analysis is their own. Though Richard Herrnstein had a strong background in psychology, co-author Charles Murray was not an expert in intelligence testing.[1]

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Bell_Curve

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Diversity" Is Costing Us Dearly!

 

"Diversity" is arguably the most popular "feel-good" word in American popular culture. It conjures up images of a society where everyone is welcome and nobody dominates.

 

Of course, those seeking to promote diversity never express a need to admit more whites or even Hispanics to "historically black colleges," nor to increase black or Indian homeownership in New York's Chinatown. "Diversity," far from meaning "let's all get together," really means, "let's displace whites." And racially unconscious whites don't care about—in fact, they even "celebrate"—their own decline.

 

But according to a new study undertaken by Dr. Edwin S. Rubinstein, the negative effects of diversity programs are not limited to the whites who are displaced by them. They are harming the economy as a whole—to the tune of trillions of dollars.

 

Today's neo-"conservatives," whose only remaining connection to traditional conservatism is a concern for free enterprise and economic prosperity, routinely join liberals in the clamor for more diversity. They would do well to read Dr. Rubinstein's study, which proves that the damages caused by diversity can be measured in the only terms neocons understand: dollars and cents. Lots of dollars and cents.

 

http://www.nationalpolicyinstitute.org/pdf...ofdiversity.pdf

The NPI is a quasi-white supremacist group partially funded by The Pioneer Fund, a pro-eugenics foundation. Go to NPI's website and see for yourself, although it's probably not something you want up on your monitor if you're at work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The NPI is a quasi-white supremacist group partially funded by The Pioneer Fund, a pro-eugenics foundation. Go to NPI's website and see for yourself, although it's probably not something you want up on your monitor if you're at work.

 

Isn't that Planned Parenthood? Read Margret Sanger's writings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...
But according to a new study undertaken by Dr. Edwin S. Rubinstein, the negative effects of diversity programs are not limited to the whites who are displaced by them. They are harming the economy as a whole—to the tune of trillions of dollars.

 

Dr Rubinstein is at the forefront of this field!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Yes, I remember it, I never saw a scientific refutation of his statement. It took his statement of fact and turned it into a racist diatribe. Amazing how no one attacked the study, but the person, which is not an argument, it's demagoguery and the argument of weak minded individuals when confronted with facts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...