WendyGirl33 Posted October 22, 2008 Posted October 22, 2008 "Diversity" Is Costing Us Dearly! "Diversity" is arguably the most popular "feel-good" word in American popular culture. It conjures up images of a society where everyone is welcome and nobody dominates. Of course, those seeking to promote diversity never express a need to admit more whites or even Hispanics to "historically black colleges," nor to increase black or Indian homeownership in New York's Chinatown. "Diversity," far from meaning "let's all get together," really means, "let's displace whites." And racially unconscious whites don't care about—in fact, they even "celebrate"—their own decline. But according to a new study undertaken by Dr. Edwin S. Rubinstein, the negative effects of diversity programs are not limited to the whites who are displaced by them. They are harming the economy as a whole—to the tune of trillions of dollars. Today's neo-"conservatives," whose only remaining connection to traditional conservatism is a concern for free enterprise and economic prosperity, routinely join liberals in the clamor for more diversity. They would do well to read Dr. Rubinstein's study, which proves that the damages caused by diversity can be measured in the only terms neocons understand: dollars and cents. Lots of dollars and cents. http://www.nationalpolicyinstitute.org/pdf...ofdiversity.pdf
molson_golden2002 Posted October 22, 2008 Posted October 22, 2008 I'll tell ya what's costing lots of money, them damn stray animals running around. All they do is breed and sh--- all over everything. Pisses me off, too.
TheLynchTrain Posted October 22, 2008 Posted October 22, 2008 yeah sounds like we need to bring back SEGREGATION!!!! GET ER DONE!!! I read the study and I experienced first hand how organizations, take colleges for example, pushed the buzz word Diversity to the extreme. But come on, you are sounding really naive and racist in this post.
molson_golden2002 Posted October 22, 2008 Posted October 22, 2008 Remember this? The Bell Curve is a controversial, best-selling 1994 book by the late Harvard psychologist Richard J. Herrnstein and American Enterprise Institute political scientist Charles Murray. Its central point is that intelligence is a better predictor of many factors including financial income, job performance, unwed pregnancy, and crime than parents' socioeconomic status or education level. Also, the book argued that those with high intelligence, which it called the "cognitive elite", are becoming separated from the general population of those with average and below-average intelligence and that this was a dangerous social trend. Much of the controversy concerned Chapters 13 and 14, in which the authors wrote about the enduring racial differences in intelligence and discuss implications of those differences. The authors were reported throughout the popular press as arguing that these IQ differences are genetic, and they did indeed write in chapter 13 "It seems highly likely to us that both genes and the environment have something to with racial differences." The introduction to the chapter more cautiously states, "The debate about whether and how much genes and environment have to do with ethnic differences remains unresolved."The book draws heavily from mainstream science research. However, their analysis is their own. Though Richard Herrnstein had a strong background in psychology, co-author Charles Murray was not an expert in intelligence testing.[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Bell_Curve
Boomer860 Posted October 22, 2008 Posted October 22, 2008 Police prepare for riots during election period , no matter who wins Must be they are concerned about the white middle class suburbanites getting out of hand
molson_golden2002 Posted October 22, 2008 Posted October 22, 2008 Police prepare for riots during election period , no matter who wins Must be they are concerned about the white middle class suburbanites getting out of hand
erynthered Posted October 22, 2008 Posted October 22, 2008 Police prepare for riots during election period , no matter who wins Must be they are concerned about the white middle class suburbanites getting out of hand I'm taking the train to the voting station. I WILL NOT BE DENIED!!
DC Tom Posted October 22, 2008 Posted October 22, 2008 I'm not going to pay attention to this thread. So can someone let me know when Holcomb's Arm shows up to defend it. He's late for his quarterly beating.
Johnny Coli Posted October 22, 2008 Posted October 22, 2008 "Diversity" Is Costing Us Dearly! "Diversity" is arguably the most popular "feel-good" word in American popular culture. It conjures up images of a society where everyone is welcome and nobody dominates. Of course, those seeking to promote diversity never express a need to admit more whites or even Hispanics to "historically black colleges," nor to increase black or Indian homeownership in New York's Chinatown. "Diversity," far from meaning "let's all get together," really means, "let's displace whites." And racially unconscious whites don't care about—in fact, they even "celebrate"—their own decline. But according to a new study undertaken by Dr. Edwin S. Rubinstein, the negative effects of diversity programs are not limited to the whites who are displaced by them. They are harming the economy as a whole—to the tune of trillions of dollars. Today's neo-"conservatives," whose only remaining connection to traditional conservatism is a concern for free enterprise and economic prosperity, routinely join liberals in the clamor for more diversity. They would do well to read Dr. Rubinstein's study, which proves that the damages caused by diversity can be measured in the only terms neocons understand: dollars and cents. Lots of dollars and cents. http://www.nationalpolicyinstitute.org/pdf...ofdiversity.pdf The NPI is a quasi-white supremacist group partially funded by The Pioneer Fund, a pro-eugenics foundation. Go to NPI's website and see for yourself, although it's probably not something you want up on your monitor if you're at work.
Johnny Coli Posted October 22, 2008 Posted October 22, 2008 I'm not going to pay attention to this thread. So can someone let me know when Holcomb's Arm shows up to defend it. He's late for his quarterly beating. He's the first thing that came to mind when I saw it, too.
Wacka Posted October 22, 2008 Posted October 22, 2008 The NPI is a quasi-white supremacist group partially funded by The Pioneer Fund, a pro-eugenics foundation. Go to NPI's website and see for yourself, although it's probably not something you want up on your monitor if you're at work. Isn't that Planned Parenthood? Read Margret Sanger's writings.
Ramius Posted October 22, 2008 Posted October 22, 2008 Where's Kurt? Its a match made in (an obviously all-white) heaven.
YellowLinesandArmadillos Posted October 22, 2008 Posted October 22, 2008 Dude, scary shi*&^, people still believe this kind of crap. Diversity is what makes our country great and able to compete against all cultures and adapt to changes as well as we do. Never mind, this is nuts.
Andrew in CA Posted October 22, 2008 Posted October 22, 2008 So, this is your "thing"? Every post you've made is the start of a race-based topic, always painting white people as victims of one thing or another, and then never come back for a discussion? Get lost.
bills_fan_in_raleigh Posted October 22, 2008 Posted October 22, 2008 So, this is your "thing"? Every post you've made is the start of a race-based topic, always painting white people as victims of one thing or another, and then never come back for a discussion? Get lost. She's Da Big Man in drag
Truth Machine Posted February 28, 2009 Posted February 28, 2009 But according to a new study undertaken by Dr. Edwin S. Rubinstein, the negative effects of diversity programs are not limited to the whites who are displaced by them. They are harming the economy as a whole—to the tune of trillions of dollars. Dr Rubinstein is at the forefront of this field!
/dev/null Posted February 28, 2009 Posted February 28, 2009 Dr Rubinstein is at the forefront of this field! Rubinstein Rubinstein But that sounds like Jewish name
StupidNation Posted February 28, 2009 Posted February 28, 2009 Remember this? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Bell_Curve Yes, I remember it, I never saw a scientific refutation of his statement. It took his statement of fact and turned it into a racist diatribe. Amazing how no one attacked the study, but the person, which is not an argument, it's demagoguery and the argument of weak minded individuals when confronted with facts.
Recommended Posts